As a seasoned crypto investor, I’ve witnessed firsthand the rollercoaster ride that is the relationship between the SEC and the crypto industry. The latest development in the Ripple case has me on the edge of my seat, as the May 20 deadline for the Commission’s response to Ripple’s sealing requests approaches.
On May 20th, the SEC’s anticipated response is due in the protracted legal dispute between them and Ripple. Ripple aims to safeguard its commercial concerns through this motion.
SEC To File Opposition To Ripple’s Sealing Requests
As a crypto investor following the ongoing legal battle between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple, I’ve learned that according to recently disclosed court documents, the SEC is required to submit its opposition letter to Ripple’s motion to seal by May 20th. This motion was filed by Ripple on my behalf, along with other parties, on May 13rd, in adherence to the scheduling order that set this date as the deadline for filing such motions regarding documents pertaining to the remedies stage.
Based on Ripple’s disclosure in their May 13 filing, the SEC has given their consent to certain of Ripple’s sealing requests but intends to oppose others. As a result, it can be expected that the SEC will grant some of Ripple’s requests.
As a crypto investor, I understand that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has agreed to redact the names of some business partners of Ripple with whom their partnership hasn’t been publicly disclosed. However, Ripple is pushing for more than just this as they aim to conceal the identities of third parties whose involvement in the case holds no significance to its outcome.
The cryptocurrency company has asked the court to conceal or edit specific records containing Ripple’s audited financial reports and other confidential financial data. They argue that releasing this information would seriously damage their business operations and competitive edge.
As a crypto investor following Ripple’s case closely, I can tell you that the company is working hard to keep certain details of its business relationships confidential. They argue that these redactions are limited to specific financial and pricing terms that were negotiated with their partners. This request aligns with the court’s previous decisions on summary judgment regarding proposed redactions.
Joy Is Coming For The Crypto Industry
The reason behind Ripple’s ongoing legal disputes with the SEC is the absence of clear-cut regulations in the US crypto industry. Fortunately, this situation may improve soon as the US Congress is set to vote on the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century (FIT21) bill, which aims to bring regulatory clarity to crypto businesses.
Should the legislation be enacted, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) would assume the leading role in overseeing the crypto asset market. This shift represents a significant change as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has historically taken a broad stance on crypto-related issues, aiming to exert control through its enforcement efforts against related businesses.
Read More
- BTC PREDICTION. BTC cryptocurrency
- LUNC PREDICTION. LUNC cryptocurrency
- MNT PREDICTION. MNT cryptocurrency
- Best Goomba Characters In Mario Games, Ranked
- BCH PREDICTION. BCH cryptocurrency
- USD RUB PREDICTION
- SOL PREDICTION. SOL cryptocurrency
- Destiny 2 Player Transforms Their Warlock Into Team Fortress 2’s Medic
- Survival Horror Games With an Unkillable Enemy
- Marvel Rivals Players Aren’t Happy With The Gold Rank Competitive Reward
2024-05-20 16:42