As a long-term crypto investor with experience in following regulatory developments, I find the ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the SEC particularly intriguing. The latest filing by the SEC is an important step towards a resolution, but it also raises concerns about transparency and privacy.
The prolonged dispute between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple is nearing a conclusion, with the SEC’s recent court filing bringing us closer to a resolution. Both parties have submitted their final arguments, leading experts to anticipate a judgment from the court imminently.
What The SEC’s Latest Filing Is About
The SEC submitted a letter to counter Ripple’s application to conceal certain documents relevant to the remedies phase. In agreement with previous information, the commission stated that they weren’t objecting to all of Ripple’s requests. However, for the redacted portions the SEC contended that Ripple hadn’t met “the substantial burden to rebut the powerful assumption that court records should be accessible to the public.”
The regulator emphasized that the contested materials are crucial to understanding the reasoning behind the SEC’s proposed remedies. Simultaneously, Ripple extended an invitation to the public to evaluate the merits of the Commission’s stance. Consequently, Ripple cannot conceal from public scrutiny the evidence underpinning the SEC’s position.
The SEC added that Ripple’s contention about potential harm to its business if documents were unredacted does not absolve it from proving exceptional reasons for keeping certain information sealed or redacted. Additionally, Ripple had referenced previous instances in the case where the court granted sealing and redaction requests.
The Commission argues that Ripple’s past requests for protective orders regarding financial information and offering terms do not apply to the current case. Initially, the court made those rulings on specific filings, not for the entirety of the proceedings. However, now, the disclosure of this information is crucial in determining the appropriate remedies for the ongoing litigation between Ripple and the SEC.
The SEC contended that the documents Ripple intends to conceal are ones that it would have been compelled to make public anyway, since the court had previously determined that the company’s institutional sales qualified as investment contracts. Moreover, the Commission asserted that these documents were no longer relevant and there was no reason to shield them from public view.
When Is A Final Judgment Expected For Ripple?
The anticipated final judgment from Judge Analisa Torres is near at hand as both parties have submitted their arguments in accordance with the set timeline. Nevertheless, prior to rendering her decision, the judge must first address Ripple’s request to seal their financial records. She will determine whether this information should remain confidential or be made accessible to the public.
According to the recent court decision, Ripple has two weeks to submit either a public or redacted version of the contested documents, as determined by the court. Following this submission, the court will then be in a position to deliver its final verdict. The SEC has suggested that Judge Torres impose a fine against Ripple amounting to nearly $2 billion.
As a Ripple investor, I’d rephrase it this way: Ripple has disputed the suggested penalties and requested the court to impose a fine no greater than $10 million.
Read More
- LUNC PREDICTION. LUNC cryptocurrency
- BTC PREDICTION. BTC cryptocurrency
- MNT PREDICTION. MNT cryptocurrency
- Best Goomba Characters In Mario Games, Ranked
- BCH PREDICTION. BCH cryptocurrency
- USD RUB PREDICTION
- ETHW PREDICTION. ETHW cryptocurrency
- SOL PREDICTION. SOL cryptocurrency
- MANTA PREDICTION. MANTA cryptocurrency
- Pokemon Fan Shares Adorable Twin Umbreon Rug
2024-05-22 20:11