Betrayal In The Force: How An Indian Officer’s Bitcoin Theft Could Change Crypto Policing Forever

As a researcher, I find this case to be deeply concerning, not only because of the significant financial loss incurred due to the crypto breach but also due to the betrayal of trust by a law enforcement officer. Chandrahar’s actions have jeopardized ongoing investigations into major cryptocurrency scams and have undermined public faith in the Indian police force’s ability to effectively regulate digital assets.


An Indian police officer named Chandrahar SR was recently taken into custody for clandestinely transferring around 1.8 crore Indian Rupees (approximately $216,000) worth of Bitcoin illicitly.

As a crypto investor looking back on events, I recall that during this period, around 2017, there was an ongoing investigation into a significant cryptocurrency scam.

The Scam And The Breach

Formally ex-inspector Chandrahar took advantage of his role within the Central Crime Branch (CCB) to gain unauthorized entry into and move Bitcoins from the digital wallet of a suspect implicated in an illegal Bitcoin scheme.

In the ongoing investigation into a series of high-profile cryptocurrency exchange hacks, involving Bitfinex and Unocoin, this wallet was meant to serve as crucial evidence. The illicit activities were allegedly masterminded by the hackers Srikrishna Ramesh and Robin Khandelwal.

Although Chandrahar and his partner accumulated approximately $660,000 by engaging in cybercrimes, his actions significantly violated the legal and moral standards applicable to law enforcement personnel.

As a crypto investor, I would put it this way: When Bitcoin suddenly went missing, I became concerned and closely followed the developments. The authorities formed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to get to the bottom of this mystery. During their investigation, the SIT discovered some suspicious activities and inconsistencies in the handling of related evidence.

In collaboration with two other officers and a cyber expert named Santosh Kumar, I orchestrated unauthorized access to Khandelwal’s digital wallet. We compelled him to transfer the funds through coercion. Subsequently, we tried to eliminate any evidence of our involvement by attempting to erase our digital footprints.

As a crypto investor, I’ve learned that actions with hidden agendas can significantly impact the trust and success of any investigation. In this case, the officers involved in Chandrahar’s arrest acted in a way that compromised the police force’s credibility and put the entire investigation at risk. Chandrahar had managed to evade capture beforehand due to an unsuccessful plea for “anticipatory bail.” An officer from the Special Investigation Team (SIT) shared his concerns:

On Wednesday, we presented Chandradhar before a judge and then detained him for a five-day period.

As a crypto investor, I’ve been following the recent developments in this case closely. The allegations against the accused individuals involve serious offenses such as illegally detaining others, breaching trust as public servants, and destroying crucial evidence. This situation serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and challenges we face when it comes to enforcing laws in the digital asset space within our current legal frameworks. The trust that is essential for the functioning of any financial system has been significantly undermined by these actions.

India’s Stance On Crypto

As a cryptocurrency analyst, I would describe it this way: Lately, India has taken a firm stance against cryptocurrencies, imposing substantial taxation regulations on transactions involving these digital assets. Additionally, the Indian authorities have taken concrete steps to restrict the operations of several prominent international crypto exchanges within their jurisdiction.

Last December, I came across news that India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) had taken action by issuing compliance notices to several digital platforms. The FIU was insisting on their adherence to local regulations.

The Information Ministry was asked to prevent access within the country to the URLs of nine major cryptocurrency exchanges. Affected platforms include Binance, Kraken, KuCoin, Huobi, Gate.io, Bittrex, Bitstamp, MEXC, and Bitfinex.

As a researcher studying the cryptocurrency exchange market, I’ve observed that Binance, in response to regulatory measures, has taken substantial actions to reactivate its regional functions. By April, this prominent exchange had adjusted its practices to comply with India’s anti-money laundering and tax regulations, resulting in a $2 million fine payment. This reform initiative is aimed at improving Binance’s operations within South Asia.

Betrayal In The Force: How An Indian Officer’s Bitcoin Theft Could Change Crypto Policing Forever

Featured image created with DALL-E, Chart from TradingView

Read More

2024-05-31 23:12