Judge Alerts Possible Juror Bias in Trump Verdict Ahead of US Election

As a seasoned crypto investor and follower of current events, I find the allegations of juror misconduct in former President Trump’s criminal case quite concerning. The potential implications for Trump’s legal team are significant, as this could potentially taint the fairness of the trial and provide grounds for an appeal based on juror bias.


There’s been a noteworthy discussion on Facebook regarding potential juror impartiality in the ongoing New York criminal trial of Donald Trump.

I, Juan Merchan, revealed to both sides in the Trump trial that one of the jury members was suspected of sharing the verdict with their family before casting their vote.

Allegations of Juror Misconduct in Trump Case

As an analyst, I came across a remark on the publicly accessible Facebook page of the Unified Court System that casts doubt upon the conduct of jurors. This comment was left by an individual named “Michael Anderson.”

“A family member of mine serves on the jury for the ongoing trial, and they’ve shared that there seems to be strong evidence against Trump. I want to express my appreciation to everyone involved in the rigorous process.”

On the seventh of June, 2024, this matter was brought before defense attorney Todd Blanche for Trump, as well as prosecutor ADA Joshua Steinglass.

Merchan pointed out that the incriminating remark was made on May 28, a day before the jury delivered its landmark verdict finding a former U.S. president guilty on all 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree for the first time in history. The six-week trial came to an end with this groundbreaking decision.

Implications for Trump’s Legal Team

The discovery of this issue has led Trump’s legal team to seek out additional details concerning Judge Merchan’s notification. A representative from the Trump campaign spoke with Fox News Digital, revealing that an investigation into the matter is underway.

BREAKING – JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT IN TRUMP’S VERDICT? In a letter, today, June 7, 2024, Judge Juan M. Merchan of the New York Supreme Court, alerted the involved parties in the case *People v. Trump* about a concerning comment posted on the Unified Court System’s Facebook page a…

— Simon Ateba (@simonateba) June 7, 2024

As an analyst, I would rephrase that sentence as follows: My examination of the Facebook comment raises questions about the validity of the jury’s decision-making process during the trial, potentially introducing a significant bias and undermining its fairness.

An OCA representative, Al Baker, verified the matter, mentioning that the court notified the involved parties about the online material once it was brought to the court’s attention. During the anticipated appeal, the defense may utilize this detail and argue juror bias in addition to the trial’s validity.

Political and Public Reactions

As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed a stirring reaction from both the public and political sphere following Donald Trump’s conviction. Notable figures like Robert Kiyosaki and Elon Musk have taken to social media to express their doubts about the verdict’s underlying motivations.

Kiyosaki denounced the verdict as a dismal turn of events for American history and castigated it as a “kangaroo court” adhering to Woke ideologies. In parallel, Musk voiced concerns that the judgment was politically motivated, raising doubts about the impartiality of the American legal system.

In spite of the guilty ruling, some political pundits argue that Trump’s conviction may strengthen his voter base. Supporters such as Theresa Albano contend that this judgment could provoke additional individuals to cast their ballots for Trump during the upcoming presidential election. Trump has declared his intention to persist in his struggle and characterized the guilty verdict as a blemish on New York’s legal system.

Judge Juan Merchan will preside over the final verdict and sentencing in Trump’s case in July. The accusations against him could result in a maximum prison term of four years, but alternative penalties like fines or probation may be considered due to Trump being a first-time offender. Trump’s lawyers are readying for an appeal, with their arguments expected to revolve around the suspected juror misconduct and the overall legitimacy of the indictment.

Dormant Ethereum Whale Wakes Up After 8 Years, 6,000 ETH Facing Selloff Risk

Read More

2024-06-08 02:16