XRP vs. Ethereum: SEC Decision Ignites XRP Community’s Fury

As an analyst with a background in cryptocurrency regulation and securities law, I have followed the ongoing saga between Ethereum (ETH) and Ripple (XRP) with great interest. The recent announcement that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may be closing its investigation into Ethereum has sparked renewed controversy and frustration within the XRP community.


According to a recent statement from Consensys, the company developing MetaMask wallet, it seems that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may soon conclude its probe into Ethereum.

In early June, the firm disclosed that they had reached out to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with a letter asking for clarification. This correspondence aimed to confirm if the SEC’s approval of the Ethereum spot ETF in May signified the resolution of the regulatory proceedings against Ethereum as the major altcoin.

As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed that recent developments have elicited diverse responses within the market. The announcement of Ethereum’s seemingly favorable regulatory stance revitalized the crypto sphere, resulting in a much-needed price surge after a prolonged downturn. However, the XRP community, on the other hand, has expressed disappointment and doubt following this news.

Ethereum gets SEC nod, XRP fans see red

The controversy, known as “ETHGate,” revolves around the long-standing disagreement between XRP and Ethereum. It stems from accusations that the SEC favored Ethereum, potentially harming XRP and other digital currencies.

Bill Morgan, a well-known XRP advocate and lawyer, voiced his displeasure over the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) seemingly favoring Ethereum once again. He pointed out that this latest move represents Ethereum’s second instance of avoiding SEC scrutiny, bringing attention to what he perceives as unpredictable and inconsistent regulatory actions by the SEC.

As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed an intriguing development: Ethereum received its second reprieve from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) around six years after the Hinman speech. However, this leniency stands in stark contrast to the ongoing legal battles faced by Ripple. This inconsistency highlights the arbitrary nature of the SEC’s regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies.

— bill morgan (@Belisarius2020) June 19, 2024

The Hinman speech delivered by William Hinman, ex-SEC Director, stating Ethereum wasn’t classified as a security, remains a contentious issue. Morgan holds the view that this statement established an unjust advantage for Ethereum at Ripple and XRP‘s expense, exposing the latter to potential legal disputes.

Some XRP advocates shared similar views, urging potential legal steps against the SEC and accusing the Ethereum community of exerting financial power to obtain beneficial regulatory decisions.

Read More

2024-06-19 17:21