FDIC Nominee Says Banks Free to Serve Digital Asset Firms

by

As a seasoned crypto investor with a keen interest in the regulatory landscape, I find Goldsmith Romero’s comments before the Senate Banking Committee incredibly encouraging. Her stance that it’s not the FDIC’s role to dictate which industries or companies banks should do business with is a step towards a less restrictive regulatory framework for the digital assets industry.

During her testimony before the Senate Banking Committee in her capacity as an FDIC nominee, Christy Goldsmith Romero expressed her viewpoint that the FDIC should not dictate which businesses banks are permitted or forbidden from serving. This comment was made in response to a query from Senator Cynthia Lummis regarding whether banks should be granted the freedom to offer services to digital asset firms.

FDIC Says Banks Free to Serve Digital Asset

I discovered that President Biden announced his intent to appoint Christy Goldsmith Romero, a Democrat and lawyer, to head the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). This nomination comes after Martin Gruenberg, the current FDIC chairman, announced his resignation due to allegations of misconduct within the agency’s ranks.

This is HUGE 

CL: “Should banks be able to provide services to digital asset companies like payment services?”

Expert: “I agree with you that it’s not within the FDIC’s jurisdiction to dictate which industries or businesses banks should serve.”

Watch the full clip below

— Senator Cynthia Lummis (@SenLummis) July 13, 2024

During the hearing, GOP senators voiced concerns over Goldsmith Romero’s insufficient background in banking oversight and policy-making. However, she remained unfazed and declared her readiness to gather additional insights regarding the proposed enhancements in bank capital – a contentious matter among financial institutions.

Goldsmith Romero’s response to Senator Lummis’ query regarding banks collaborating with digital asset firms indicates a potential shift toward a more lenient regulatory approach for the digital asset sector. She remarked,

“It’s not my opinion that the FDIC has the authority to tell banks which industries or companies they must conduct business with.”

Banks to Exclude Crypto Holdings

As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed that according to Coingape’s latest report, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken steps allowing banks and brokerages to exclude digital assets from their financial statements while managing related risks. This announcement comes at a time when the SEC’s accounting guidance for crypto assets, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121 (SAB 121), is being reevaluated regarding the obligations for companies that hold crypto assets on behalf of their clients.

As a crypto investor, I’m excited about the SEC’s latest move offering financial institutions a more flexible approach to managing crypto assets. Instead of being bound by the strict guidelines of SAB 121, they now have the freedom to explore new methods in this rapidly evolving space.

I’ve recently learned that some banks and brokerages have consulted the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for legal guidance regarding their crypto-related operations. This move underscores the differences between their practices and those described in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121 (SAB 121). As a result, certain financial institutions have obtained exemptions from these rules to ensure the protection of their customers’ assets during market instability.

In May, I, along with FDIC Vice Chairman Travis Hill, advocated for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to provide clearer regulations regarding the crypto sector. I expressed concerns that the SEC’s current definition of “crypto-assets” is overly broad, encompassing not just digital currencies but also blockchain-based assets and tokenized representations of real-world assets.

Bitcoin Price Eyes $70k Rally as Long-Term Holders Accumulate at Record Pace

Read More

2024-07-13 20:56