Squeezing More Performance from Language Models

Author: Denis Avetisyan


A new technique efficiently compresses and reuses memory caches, significantly boosting the speed and scalability of large language model serving.

Through the fusion of key-value (KV) cache blocks, the computational footprint during batch decoding is demonstrably reduced, and efficiency is further enhanced by enabling the reuse of computations across unified representations of data chunks - a strategy illustrated by the shared computation of chunks 0, 1, and 2, effectively minimizing redundant matrix operations and optimizing performance via <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false"> KV </span> cache management.
Through the fusion of key-value (KV) cache blocks, the computational footprint during batch decoding is demonstrably reduced, and efficiency is further enhanced by enabling the reuse of computations across unified representations of data chunks – a strategy illustrated by the shared computation of chunks 0, 1, and 2, effectively minimizing redundant matrix operations and optimizing performance via KV cache management.

Fast Fusion enables improved batching and reduced memory bandwidth requirements through joint encoding of KV-cache blocks.

Despite the rapid advancement of large language models, serving them efficiently remains challenged by the memory-intensive growth of key-value (KV) caches. This paper, ‘Joint Encoding of KV-Cache Blocks for Scalable LLM Serving’, introduces a novel approach-Fast Fusion-that compresses and reuses KV cache blocks to alleviate this bottleneck. By fusing similar blocks across requests, Fast Fusion substantially reduces memory bandwidth requirements and enables more effective batching during inference. Could this technique unlock a new era of scalable and cost-effective LLM deployment, paving the way for even more interactive and accessible AI systems?


The Inherent Memory Bottleneck in Large Language Models

Modern Large Language Model (LLM) services are increasingly constrained by the sheer size of their Key-Value (KV) cache. This cache, essential for storing the history of interactions and enabling coherent responses, scales dramatically with both the length of the input sequence and the number of parameters within the model itself. As models grow more sophisticated – boasting billions or even trillions of parameters – and users demand longer, more contextually rich interactions, the KV cache expands proportionally. This creates a significant memory footprint, often exceeding the capacity of readily available hardware. The escalating size isn’t merely a storage issue; it directly impacts performance, requiring more time to access and process cached information, and consequently increasing latency and operational costs for LLM-powered applications. Effectively managing this ever-growing cache is therefore a central challenge in deploying and scaling next-generation language services.

Current large language model serving infrastructure often falters when tasked with managing the substantial key-value (KV) cache – a critical component that stores past computations to accelerate processing. This inefficiency manifests as increased latency, as the system spends more time retrieving and storing data within the cache rather than generating new text. Consequently, serving these models becomes increasingly expensive; the need for larger and faster memory systems, coupled with the energy consumption of frequent data transfers, drives up operational costs. Traditional methods, designed for smaller models and shorter sequences, simply cannot keep pace with the demands of modern LLMs, creating a significant bottleneck that limits scalability and hinders widespread adoption. The problem isn’t necessarily a lack of memory capacity, but rather the rate at which data can be moved in and out of it, impacting both the initial processing of input – the prefill stage – and the iterative generation of output during decoding.

The fundamental constraint in serving large language models lies not simply in the size of the key-value (KV) cache, but in the rate at which data can move to and from memory – the memory bandwidth. During the initial ‘prefill’ stage, where the model processes the entire input sequence, and especially during the iterative ‘decode’ stage where it generates output token by token, the model demands rapid access to the KV cache. Insufficient bandwidth creates a bottleneck, forcing the processing units to wait for data, which directly translates to increased latency and reduced throughput. This limitation becomes particularly acute with longer sequences and larger models, as the KV cache expands, intensifying the data transfer requirements. Consequently, scaling LLM services necessitates innovative approaches to optimize memory access and alleviate this bandwidth-induced performance constraint, rather than solely focusing on cache size reduction.

Performance comparisons between BFF and CFF with Llama-2 7B reveal that BFF achieves higher F1 scores at varying compression ratios and batch sizes on both vLLM random data and conversational datasets, while CFF demonstrates similar trends with <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">	ext{4}</span> chunks.
Performance comparisons between BFF and CFF with Llama-2 7B reveal that BFF achieves higher F1 scores at varying compression ratios and batch sizes on both vLLM random data and conversational datasets, while CFF demonstrates similar trends with ext{4} chunks.

Efficient Cache Management Through Compression

Key-Value (KV) cache compression techniques address the substantial memory requirements of large language models by reducing the precision and redundancy of stored data. Quantization lowers the number of bits used to represent each value, decreasing memory usage but potentially introducing rounding errors. Low-Rank Approximation decomposes the KV cache matrix into lower-dimensional representations, exploiting inherent redundancies and reducing storage needs at the cost of some information. Adaptive Arithmetic Encoding, a lossless data compression method, leverages statistical modeling to assign shorter codes to more frequent values, achieving compression without data loss, though computational overhead may be incurred. Each of these methods involves a trade-off between compression ratio and potential accuracy degradation, necessitating careful tuning to balance performance and quality.

Selective eviction strategies and cross-layer state compression are employed to optimize KV cache memory usage. Selective eviction identifies and preserves the most frequently accessed or otherwise critical cache entries, discarding less important data to maximize the utility of limited memory. Simultaneously, cross-layer state compression addresses redundancy inherent in transformer architectures by recognizing and eliminating duplicated information across different layers of the model. This dual approach focuses on both intelligent data retention and efficient data representation, leading to a reduced memory footprint without necessarily sacrificing model performance.

Key-value (KV) cache compression techniques are foundational to addressing the memory limitations inherent in large language model inference. Recent implementations of methods like Quantization, Low-Rank Approximation, and Adaptive Arithmetic Encoding have demonstrated substantial reductions in memory footprint without significant performance degradation. Specifically, testing on the Qwen2.5-72B model achieved a compression ratio of 4.38x, and the Llama-3.1-8B model saw a 3.11x reduction, indicating a viable pathway to deploying larger models on constrained hardware.

Prefix Sharing and Advanced Fusion: Leveraging Redundancy

Prefix sharing is an optimization technique that leverages the redundancy inherent in many request patterns to reduce computational load and memory bandwidth requirements. When subsequent requests share identical initial prefixes – the beginning portion of the request key – the system reuses previously computed and cached states associated with that prefix. This avoids redundant computation for the shared prefix portion, as the result is already available in the cache. The efficiency gains are directly proportional to the length of the shared prefix and the frequency of such repeating patterns; longer, more frequent prefixes yield greater reductions in both computation and memory access latency. This technique is particularly effective in scenarios with repetitive or predictable request sequences, common in areas like language modeling and recommendation systems.

Joint-Encoding schemes enhance prefix sharing by actively fusing similar cache blocks, rather than relying solely on identical prefixes. Variations such as Batch Fast-Fusion and Chunks Fast-Fusion implement this through different granularities of block merging. The determination of similarity between cache blocks is quantitatively assessed using metrics like Cosine Similarity, which calculates the angle between vector representations of the cached data. Higher cosine similarity scores indicate greater similarity and therefore a stronger candidate for fusion, reducing redundant storage and computational load by representing multiple similar blocks with a single, consolidated block.

Tree-structured fusion strategies enhance the efficiency of cache fusion techniques by organizing similar cache blocks into a hierarchical tree structure. This allows for the selective fusion of blocks based on their similarity and relevance, reducing redundant computations and memory transfers. Frameworks such as HydraGen, RelayAttention, and SGLang provide practical implementations of this approach; HydraGen focuses on generating efficient fusion trees, RelayAttention utilizes attention mechanisms to guide the fusion process, and SGLang offers a language framework for defining and optimizing these fusion strategies. These implementations commonly utilize metrics like cosine similarity to quantify the relatedness of cache blocks and determine the optimal fusion hierarchy.

Evaluation on the Longbench qmsum dataset demonstrates that both Llama3.1-8B and Qwen2.5-72B models achieve improved CR and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">F_1</span> scores with an increasing number of chunks.
Evaluation on the Longbench qmsum dataset demonstrates that both Llama3.1-8B and Qwen2.5-72B models achieve improved CR and F_1 scores with an increasing number of chunks.

Paged Attention and Optimized Frameworks: A Paradigm Shift

Paged Attention addresses a critical challenge in large language model serving: the inefficient use of memory due to fragmentation within the key-value (KV) cache. Traditional approaches often leave significant portions of memory unusable as requests of varying lengths arrive and depart. This technique partitions the KV-cache into fixed-size blocks, analogous to pages in a virtual memory system, and meticulously tracks these blocks using a Block Table. This allows for dynamic allocation and reuse of memory, minimizing wasted space and significantly improving memory utilization. By avoiding the need to continuously reallocate large chunks of memory, Paged Attention not only reduces overhead but also contributes to faster response times and the ability to handle a greater volume of concurrent requests, ultimately unlocking more efficient and scalable LLM serving.

Modern large language model serving frameworks, such as vLLM, are engineered to maximize efficiency and responsiveness through a combination of innovative techniques, with Paged Attention at their core. These frameworks don’t simply rely on increased computational power, but intelligently manage memory and processing to deliver substantial gains in throughput – the rate at which requests are processed – and reduced latency, minimizing the time it takes to generate a response. By dynamically allocating memory for key-value caches and employing optimized scheduling algorithms, vLLM and similar systems circumvent bottlenecks inherent in traditional approaches, allowing for significantly higher concurrency and faster response times. This results in a more fluid and interactive user experience, and opens possibilities for deploying LLMs in real-time applications with demanding performance requirements.

The initial processing stage for large language models, known as the prefill, significantly impacts user experience; therefore, innovations in this area are crucial. Techniques like Tensor Parallelism distribute the computational workload across multiple devices, accelerating the process. Complementing this, Chunked-Prefilling breaks down the input sequence into smaller, manageable chunks, allowing for parallel processing and reducing the overall time required to generate the first token – a metric known as Time-To-First-Token. This dual approach not only maximizes hardware utilization but also enables faster response times, creating a more seamless and interactive experience for users engaging with the language model.

Recent innovations in large language model serving architectures are fundamentally reshaping the landscape of efficient and scalable deployment. Through techniques like Paged Attention – which addresses memory fragmentation – and optimized frameworks such as vLLM, substantial gains in throughput have been demonstrably achieved. These improvements aren’t merely theoretical; practical implementations reveal a significant reduction in latency and an increased capacity to handle concurrent requests. The collective effect of these advancements allows for more users to interact with powerful LLMs simultaneously, with faster response times, ultimately unlocking new possibilities for real-world applications and broader accessibility to artificial intelligence.

Performance benchmarks of Llama3.1-8B demonstrate that throughput and end-to-end latency are key metrics, with variations observed in benchmark duration <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false"> (b) </span> time-to-first-token <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false"> (TTFT) </span> metrics <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false"> (mean and P99) </span>, mean inter-token latency <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false"> (ITL) </span>, and overall throughput ratio <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false"> (tokens/second) </span>.
Performance benchmarks of Llama3.1-8B demonstrate that throughput and end-to-end latency are key metrics, with variations observed in benchmark duration (b) time-to-first-token (TTFT) metrics (mean and P99) , mean inter-token latency (ITL) , and overall throughput ratio (tokens/second) .

The pursuit of efficiency in large language model serving, as demonstrated by Fast Fusion, aligns with a fundamental principle of elegant design. The paper’s focus on compressing and reusing KV cache blocks to optimize memory bandwidth echoes a desire for solutions grounded in mathematical necessity. As Brian Kernighan aptly stated, “Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.” This sentiment extends to system design; a convoluted solution, however functionally ‘working’, lacks the inherent provability of a streamlined, mathematically sound approach like the block fusion detailed in the study. The reduction in memory access, enabled by Fast Fusion, isn’t merely an optimization-it’s a step toward a more demonstrably correct and sustainable system.

What’s Next?

The presented work, while demonstrably effective in reducing the practical constraints of large language model serving, merely shifts the locus of optimization. The compression of KV cache blocks, achieved through ‘Fast Fusion’, does not address the fundamental algorithmic inefficiency inherent in attention mechanisms. True scalability will not be found in clever data management, but in the derivation of attention alternatives possessing provable computational advantages. The current reliance on empirical performance – ‘it works on the benchmarks’ – is a precarious foundation.

Future research should, therefore, concentrate less on squeezing incremental gains from existing architectures and more on exploring mathematically rigorous replacements. Paged attention, and block fusion techniques like Fast Fusion, treat the symptoms of bandwidth limitations, not the underlying disease. The ideal solution remains an attention mechanism whose computational complexity scales sub-linearly with sequence length – a theoretical necessity, not simply a desirable feature.

Furthermore, the implicit assumption of uniform memory access during KV cache retrieval warrants scrutiny. Real-world hardware introduces non-uniform latency, a factor currently absent from most theoretical models. A complete solution must account for these physical realities, demanding a synthesis of algorithmic elegance and hardware awareness. Only then can one speak of genuinely scalable and efficient large language model inference.


Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.03067.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-01-08 00:45