HQC’s Hidden Weakness: A Single Trace Reveals All

Author: Denis Avetisyan


New research demonstrates a successful simple power analysis attack against the core multiplication function of the HQC post-quantum cryptosystem, highlighting critical implementation vulnerabilities.

The analysis of power consumption reveals that the value of the second set of four bits within the system registers as 4, determined by measuring the voltage drop between peaks four and five in the consumption trace.
The analysis of power consumption reveals that the value of the second set of four bits within the system registers as 4, determined by measuring the voltage drop between peaks four and five in the consumption trace.

This paper details a single-trace simple power analysis (SPA) attack on HQC’s Karatsuba-based polynomial multiplication and proposes secure implementation alternatives.

Despite the promise of post-quantum cryptography, practical implementations remain vulnerable to side-channel attacks. This paper, ‘Simple Power Analysis of Polynomial Multiplication in HQC’, details a successful single-trace simple power analysis (SPA) attack targeting the polynomial multiplication step within the Hamming Quasi-Cyclic (HQC) cryptosystem-a candidate for NIST’s post-quantum standardization. Our analysis, conducted using a ChipWhisperer-Lite board, achieves a 99.69% success rate, demonstrating a critical implementation weakness. Can proposed countermeasures effectively mitigate this vulnerability without significantly impacting performance, and what broader implications does this have for the secure deployment of HQC and other lattice-based cryptosystems?


The Looming Quantum Threat and the Rise of Post-Quantum Cryptography

The foundation of modern digital security, public-key cryptography – encompassing algorithms like RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography – relies on mathematical problems that are exceptionally difficult for classical computers to solve. However, the advent of quantum computing introduces a paradigm shift, as these same algorithms become vulnerable to attacks leveraging quantum phenomena like superposition and entanglement. Specifically, Shor’s algorithm, a quantum algorithm, can efficiently factor large numbers – the core of RSA – and solve the discrete logarithm problem used in Elliptic Curve Cryptography, effectively breaking the encryption. This poses a substantial threat to sensitive data currently protected by these methods, including financial transactions, government communications, and personal information, necessitating the development of new cryptographic approaches that can withstand the power of quantum computers.

The looming threat of quantum computers breaking widely-used public-key encryption has catalyzed the rapid development of Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC). This emerging field focuses on constructing cryptographic systems that are secure against both classical computers and quantum computers. Rather than attempting to improve existing algorithms, PQC largely explores entirely new mathematical problems believed to be hard for quantum computers to solve. These include lattice-based cryptography, code-based cryptography, multivariate cryptography, hash-based signatures, and isogeny-based cryptography. Researchers are actively designing, analyzing, and optimizing these algorithms to ensure they offer a sufficient level of security, performance, and practicality for real-world applications, effectively safeguarding digital information in a post-quantum era.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is currently leading a pivotal standardization process to proactively address the looming threat of quantum computers breaking widely used cryptographic systems. This multi-year project rigorously evaluates candidate Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) algorithms – new mathematical approaches designed to resist attacks from both classical and quantum computers. Through a series of open competitions and public reviews, NIST aims to select a suite of algorithms that will become the new standards for secure communication and data protection. The project isn’t simply about finding new cryptography; it’s about ensuring a carefully managed transition, providing developers and organizations with the time and resources to implement these quantum-resistant solutions before quantum computers become powerful enough to compromise existing security infrastructure. This standardization effort is therefore critical to maintaining trust in digital systems and safeguarding sensitive information in the decades to come.

A normalized confusion matrix demonstrates that the single-trace SPA attack successfully recovered the last 60 bits of the private key with 100% accuracy, accurately mapping predicted values to actual values.
A normalized confusion matrix demonstrates that the single-trace SPA attack successfully recovered the last 60 bits of the private key with 100% accuracy, accurately mapping predicted values to actual values.

HQC: A Code-Based KEM with Promising Security Characteristics

HQC is a Key Encapsulation Mechanism (KEM) distinguished by its demonstrated indistinguishability under adaptive chosen-ciphertext attacks (IND-CCA2 security). This security level, rigorously analyzed and documented in peer-reviewed publications, positions HQC as a leading candidate in the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process. Unlike many other post-quantum KEMs relying on lattice structures, HQC’s security is based on the well-established hardness of decoding random binary codes, offering a different approach to cryptographic resilience. The achievement of IND-CCA2 security is a primary requirement for any KEM considered for standardization, making HQC a strong contender alongside other promising algorithms.

The security of the HQC Key Encapsulation Mechanism is predicated on the presumed intractability of the decoding problem for random binary codes. This problem, formally stated as recovering the original message given a noisy codeword, has been extensively researched in the field of coding theory. Specifically, the hardness relies on the difficulty of finding the closest codeword to a received vector when the code parameters-namely, the code length n, the dimension k, and the error weight t-are appropriately chosen. While decoding algorithms exist for certain code structures, decoding random binary codes with high reliability is believed to require exponential time complexity in the dimension k, forming the computational basis for HQC’s security against adversaries.

The performance of HQC implementations is heavily influenced by the efficiency of polynomial multiplication, a core operation within the key encapsulation and decryption processes. While naive polynomial multiplication scales with O(n^2) complexity, optimized algorithms such as the Karatsuba algorithm reduce this to O(n^{log_2 3}) \approx O(n^{1.585}). This reduction in complexity is critical for practical performance, particularly with the large polynomial degrees required for achieving security levels comparable to other post-quantum KEM candidates. Further optimizations, including Number Theoretic Transform (NTT) based methods and parallelization techniques, are also employed to accelerate polynomial multiplication and overall HQC execution speed.

Side-Channel Vulnerabilities Observed in HQC Decryption

The HQC decryption process is susceptible to side-channel attacks due to data-dependent operations within the BCH decoder and polynomial multiplication stages. These operations introduce variations in execution time and power consumption that can be correlated with sensitive key data. Specifically, the BCH decoder’s iterative error correction process and the polynomial multiplication’s reliance on lookup tables create opportunities for attackers to extract information without directly breaking the cryptographic algorithm. These vulnerabilities arise because the computational path and resources utilized during decryption are not constant, but instead depend on the values of the secret key and the ciphertext, leading to observable physical emanations that can be analyzed to recover key information.

Cache timing attacks exploit the principle that accessing data from the CPU cache is significantly faster than retrieving it from main memory. In the context of HQC decryption, the Lookup Table utilized during polynomial multiplication is a prime target. The time taken to access specific entries within this table is dependent on whether that data is already cached. By carefully measuring these access times during the decryption process, an attacker can deduce information about the secret key used to generate the table’s contents. Specifically, the key bits influencing which table entries are accessed during multiplication are revealed through variations in cache hit/miss patterns, allowing for partial or complete key recovery. This vulnerability arises because the Lookup Table’s access pattern is directly correlated to the secret key and isn’t sufficiently randomized or protected during operation.

Simple Power Analysis (SPA) attacks against the HQC decryption process have demonstrated a high degree of success in recovering portions of the private key. Specifically, a single-trace SPA attack achieved a 99.69% recovery rate when performed 10,000 times. Beyond SPA, Electromagnetic Side-Channel Attacks represent a more sophisticated approach, utilizing electromagnetic emissions generated during decryption. These attacks can be further refined through the application of Offline Templates, which pre-compute expected emission profiles to improve the accuracy of key recovery and reduce false positives.

A normalized confusion matrix demonstrates the single-trace SPA attack's ability to recover the first four bits of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">aa</span>, showing the distribution of recovered values for each actual value.
A normalized confusion matrix demonstrates the single-trace SPA attack’s ability to recover the first four bits of aa, showing the distribution of recovered values for each actual value.

Mitigation Strategies and the Growing Ecosystem of Quantum-Resistant Tools

Masking represents a crucial defense against side-channel attacks, which exploit information leaked through physical characteristics like power consumption or electromagnetic radiation during computations. This technique functions by obscuring sensitive data with randomly generated values; the original data is never directly processed, but rather a masked version. This effectively breaks the correlation between the data and the observed side-channel leakage, making it significantly harder for an attacker to extract meaningful information. The addition of these random values, or “masks,” introduces noise into the computations, ensuring that any observed leakage is unrelated to the actual sensitive data being handled. While introducing computational overhead, masking provides a robust layer of security, particularly valuable in cryptographic implementations where protecting secret keys is paramount. The effectiveness of masking relies on carefully managing the randomness and preventing information about the masks themselves from being leaked, requiring sophisticated implementations to avoid vulnerabilities.

The practical deployment of Hardened Quantum Cryptography (HQC) is significantly streamlined through open-source implementations found in libraries such as liboqs and PQClean. These resources provide developers with pre-built, optimized code modules ready for integration into a variety of applications, ranging from secure communication protocols to data encryption systems. By offering readily available components, these libraries reduce the barrier to entry for utilizing post-quantum cryptographic algorithms, fostering wider adoption and enhancing overall security posture. The availability of these tools also promotes collaborative development and rigorous testing, ensuring the robustness and reliability of HQC implementations in real-world scenarios and accelerating the transition towards quantum-resistant cryptography.

The efficiency of the Karatsuba algorithm, crucial for computations in areas like post-quantum cryptography, is significantly impacted by its base-case multiplication. Analysis reveals this step relies heavily on lookup tables, creating a vulnerability to side-channel attacks and necessitating the implementation of countermeasures. However, optimizations focusing on bypassing the lookup table demonstrate substantial performance gains; specifically, the ‘base_mul2’ implementation achieves a 2.3x speedup, while ‘base_mul3’-though lacking countermeasures-delivers an even more impressive 6.9x speedup compared to the original ‘base_mul’. These results, obtained on a system equipped with an Intel Core i5-8350U CPU @ 1.70 GHz, highlight a critical trade-off between security and performance, suggesting that careful algorithm design and implementation are essential for efficient and secure cryptographic systems.

The analysis detailed within highlights a fundamental truth regarding cryptographic implementations: apparent complexity does not necessarily equate to security. The successful single-trace simple power analysis against HQC’s multiplication function underscores the importance of scrutinizing foundational operations. This resonates with Ken Thompson’s observation: “Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not going to be able to debug it.” The elegance of an algorithm, like the Karatsuba implementation within HQC, is easily undermined by implementation flaws. A holistic understanding of the system, considering both algorithmic structure and physical realization, is paramount, as vulnerabilities often stem not from conceptual weaknesses, but from subtle interactions within the implementation itself. The study demonstrates that focusing on the essential – securing the basic building blocks – is critical.

Where Do We Go From Here?

The demonstrated vulnerability isn’t surprising, merely… instructive. Systems break along invisible boundaries – if one cannot see the data-dependent control flow within a cryptographic core, pain is coming. The success of a single-trace simple power analysis against the HQC multiplication highlights a familiar truth: elegant mathematics does not automatically translate to secure implementations. The Karatsuba algorithm, while efficient, presents a clear surface for observation, and its exploitation here is a consequence of structure dictating behavior.

The immediate path forward necessitates a deeper consideration of masking techniques, not merely as add-on countermeasures, but as integral design elements. Randomization alone will prove insufficient; truly robust defenses require disrupting the direct relationship between data and power consumption at the algorithmic level. Future work must move beyond patching vulnerabilities in existing implementations and instead explore inherently leak-resistant designs – designs where the very act of observation yields no useful information.

Ultimately, the field requires a shift in perspective. The focus should not be solely on increasing computational complexity, but on minimizing information leakage. One must anticipate weaknesses, not simply react to their discovery. The question is not whether an attack can succeed, but how to build systems where even a successful attack reveals nothing of value.


Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.07634.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-01-13 08:36