Lowest Rated Steam Games

by

Steam boasts a massive library of games, including timeless classics and newer titles that didn’t quite hit the mark. While people often talk about the best games, the player reviews for the worst-rated ones are also interesting. Surprisingly, these lowest-rated games aren’t always bad ideas – sometimes they just didn’t execute well.

Lots of games began with promising concepts, well-known brands, or grand plans. However, what ultimately led to their failure was how those ideas were actually executed for players. These ratings reflect the experiences of people who purchased, played, and shared their opinions about the games. Common issues causing low ratings include technical bugs, incomplete features, poor design, performance problems, and unfulfilled promises. When a large number of players consistently report the same problems, it’s clear there are significant issues.

Find all 10 pairs Results

0
—
More Games

Command & Conquer 4: Tiberian Twilight

Player Rating: 14%

  • Futuristic strategic finale where players manage military forces and fight for control of key points in the Tiberium-infested world.
  • The game changed many of the classic Command & Conquer elements that fans expected.

So, Command & Conquer 4: Tiberian Twilight basically finishes off the Tiberium story that’s been going on in the Command & Conquer games for ages. You’re thrown into 2062, and things are looking pretty bleak – Earth is getting choked by this alien stuff called Tiberium. You get to pick a side – either the Global Defense Initiative or the Brotherhood of Nod – and try to survive and figure out how to stop Tiberium from taking over everything. It’s got a full campaign you can play through, and you can also jump into multiplayer where you fight to complete objectives.

Much of the criticism focuses on how this game changed the key features that made earlier Command & Conquer games so popular. Instead of building bases and gathering resources – things the series was known for – this game relies on capturing points and unlocking units in a set order. Many players also found the campaign disappointing, with missions that weren’t very engaging and a story that didn’t feel as impactful as in previous titles.

Spacebase DF-9

Player Rating: 16%

  • Space-station management game where players design and run a small colony in deep space.
  • Players say the game launched in an incomplete state with a lot of concerns about bugs.

Okay, so I’ve been checking out Spacebase DF-9, and the whole point of the game is you’re running a space station way out in the cosmos. You get to build it how you want, adding rooms and assigning jobs to the crew. It’s a lot of managing things – keeping everyone fed, the oxygen flowing, and dealing with disasters like fires or hull breaches. Plus, you gotta watch out for things trying to mess up your station! Honestly, though, it’s been out for over ten years now, and most players haven’t really been thrilled with it, sadly.

Many players believe this game had a promising concept but didn’t quite live up to its potential. While the core gameplay and sci-fi theme were interesting, a lot of Steam users feel the game was released too early and then wasn’t properly supported. Reviews often point out that updates slowed down or stopped after the initial launch, leaving bugs and key features unfixed.

War of the Three Kingdoms

Player Rating: 17%

  • A supposedly free online strategy card game set in the era of China’s Three Kingdoms.
  • Heavy microtransactions didn’t deliver a fun, balanced experience without paying.

Okay, so if you’re looking at strategy games, don’t get the 2018 War of Three Kingdoms mixed up with just War of the Three Kingdoms. They’re different! This one – War of the Three Kingdoms – is a free-to-play game on Steam where you collect cards and battle online. Basically, you build a deck with all these legendary heroes from ancient China’s Three Kingdoms period, and then use those cards to outsmart and defeat other players in battle. It’s all about building the best deck and using strategy to win!

While War of the Three Kingdoms has gotten a lot of attention on Steam, most of the reviews are quite negative. Players are disappointed because the main gameplay feels repetitive and encourages spending money within the game to progress.

FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction

Player Rating: 18%

  • A high-speed, destruction-focused racing experience.
  • Most players felt the driving mechanics, physics, and overall quality were far below what fans expected.

FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction promises fast-paced racing and over-the-top destruction, letting you crash into opponents and the environment while pulling off stunts. It offers a variety of game modes – standard races, demolition derbies, and stunt challenges – all focused on testing your driving skills. However, despite sounding exciting, the game doesn’t quite live up to the hype.

Players are most disappointed with the way cars handle in FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction. Many reviewers say the steering feels clumsy and unpredictable, making races hard to control. This leads to frustration instead of the exciting, fast-paced action the game should deliver, and crashes aren’t very satisfying. It’s worth noting that FlatOut 3 wasn’t made by the original developers, Bugbear Entertainment – it was developed by Team6, which explains why it feels different from the first two FlatOut games.

Star Wars: Battlefront Classic Collection

Player Rating: 21%

  • It packages the original Battlefront and Battlefront II with updated visuals and online play for new platforms.
  • Bugs, graphics, and multiplayer issues.

Released in March 2024, the Star Wars: Battlefront Classic Collection brings the original Battlefront and Battlefront 2 games to modern consoles and PCs. Players can experience classic Star Wars battles, fighting as both infantry and piloting vehicles like X-wings and AT-STs. The collection features both the original campaign and popular multiplayer modes.

The Battlefront Classic Collection aimed to update two beloved games, so fans had high hopes for a polished, modern experience that would recapture the nostalgia of the originals. Unfortunately, the initial release felt unfinished, and the core multiplayer mode – the main reason many people purchased the collection – was particularly unstable. This sparked significant frustration and negative reviews on Steam, with players focusing on technical problems and unmet expectations rather than the games’ content itself.

The 4 Sins

Player Rating: 23%

  • First-person horror adventure where four players work together to solve puzzles and explore an eerie, abandoned town.
  • Technical problems, poor execution of core mechanics, and an experience that didn’t live up to its cooperative horror promise.

While The 4 Sins intrigued players with its idea of cooperative horror, the actual game didn’t live up to expectations. This gap between the interesting concept and the disappointing gameplay is why it received mostly negative reviews on Steam.

The game received negative feedback largely because it didn’t live up to expectations for a fun and seamless cooperative horror experience. Players complained about glitches, low-quality graphics, and a constantly shaky camera. These issues were particularly damaging because the game relied on teamwork and building suspense, and instead created a frustrating and unengaging experience.

Towns

Player Rating: 25%

  • Many players felt the game was abandoned and unfinished, with bugs.
  • A city-building and management game where players build a settlement above a dangerous dungeon.

In Towns, you’re tasked with building and running a town with a lot going on. You’ll need to construct homes, workshops, and farms to keep your people working and protected. But there’s more to it than just building above ground – you’ll also send adventurers into dungeons to find treasure that will help your town thrive.

I really wanted to love Towns – the idea of building a town on top of a dungeon sounded amazing! But honestly, I was pretty disappointed, and it looks like a lot of other players were too. From what I’ve seen in the Steam reviews, it feels really unfinished, almost like the developers just left it. People kept saying it was full of bugs and barely playable. It’s a shame because the concept was cool, but all the technical issues and incomplete features really ruined the experience. It just didn’t deliver on its potential.

RollerCoaster Tycoon World

Player Rating: 26%

  • A theme park simulator where players design and run their own amusement park.
  • Concerns about controls, graphics, and crashes.

Released in 2016, RollerCoaster Tycoon World was the latest installment in the popular RollerCoaster Tycoon series. The game allowed players to design parks, build exciting roller coasters, and share their creations with the community through Steam Workshop. However, despite these goals, the game received mostly negative feedback. Returning fans hoped for a detailed and well-functioning park management simulation, but many experienced frequent crashes and performance issues.

RollerCoaster Tycoon World aimed to offer a fresh, modern park-building experience, but many fans were disappointed. Issues with the game’s performance and a feeling that key features were missing led to mostly negative reviews on Steam.

Kerbal Space Program 2

Player Rating: 26%

  • Sequel to the popular space flight simulator that places players in charge of designing rockets, managing spacecraft, and exploring the solar system with physics-based mechanics.
  • Abandoned and unfinished.

Kerbal Space Program 2 is the sequel to the beloved space simulation game. Like the original, it focuses on realistic physics, detailed planning, and experimentation. Players build spacecraft, explore other planets, and face tricky navigation challenges – all while launching adorable green astronauts into space and beyond. It’s a true test of engineering skills!

As a fan, one of the biggest disappointments I’ve seen mentioned over and over is that the game just doesn’t feel complete. It really makes sense when you find out Intercept Games let a lot of the developers go. Basically, it feels like the game isn’t getting the updates or support it needs now, and that’s a real shame.

Sacred 3

Player Rating: 26%

  • A fast-paced cooperative hack-and-slash action game where players choose a hero and battle through hordes of enemies in a fantasy world,
  • The game lacked depth, with limited customization, RPG elements, loot, and repetitive combat.

Sacred 3 is a fantasy action game where players take on the roles of powerful heroes to defeat an encroaching evil. Gameplay focuses on fast-paced, close-up combat, battling through hordes of enemies using basic attacks and special skills. The game is designed for cooperative play with friends, emphasizing teamwork and quick reflexes over complex strategy or in-depth character development.

Most players were disappointed with Sacred 3, particularly those who enjoyed the detailed role-playing aspects of the first Sacred games. Many felt the game became repetitive, with enemies and battles lacking strategic depth. Unlike other action RPGs, Sacred 3 doesn’t offer much satisfying loot or character customization, making it feel like leveling up doesn’t really change or improve your character in a meaningful way.

Read More

2026-02-14 14:39