Missed Ripple CEO Garlinghouse On 60 Minutes? Here Are The Key Takeaways

by

As a seasoned crypto investor with over a decade of experience navigating the ever-evolving digital asset landscape, I must say that the latest “60 Minutes” segment left me feeling underwhelmed and somewhat disillusioned. While it’s always exciting to see key figures like Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse on mainstream media, the lack of depth and balance in this particular episode was palpable.

In the recent broadcast of CBS’s “60 Minutes,” Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse seldom appeared to discuss the overlap between cryptocurrencies and politics. Although the program is known for its prominence, many crypto enthusiasts felt let down by the episode, as they believed that Garlinghouse’s input was scarce amidst a storyline that seemed shallow and unbalanced.

Ripple CEO Slams CBS

In the roughly 13-minute segment, the CEO of Ripple was queried about the significant role cryptocurrencies played in influencing the U.S. presidential election, focusing particularly on the considerable financial power wielded by crypto companies. CBS emphasized that Ripple, among other digital currency firms, donated a collective sum of $144 million to political action committees (PACs) backing both Republican and Democratic candidates.

Garlinghouse acknowledged the significant role these contributions played in determining election results, specifically mentioning their influence in crucial elections like those of Democratic senators in Michigan and Arizona. To put it another way, he expressed his belief that they indeed helped elect senators like Alyssa Slotkin in Michigan and Mark Kelly in Arizona.

Regarding regulation, Garlinghouse highlighted the need for definitive legal frameworks in the industry. He stressed that it’s crucial to set “clear guidelines on the highway” to keep the US at the forefront of cryptocurrency innovation instead of driving the industry overseas where safety nets are weak. Essentially, he stated that the industry has been asking for regulations and is requesting, “please, provide us with clear rules to guide our way.” The CEO of Ripple made these remarks.

Garlinghouse commended bipartisan actions, highlighting the Fit 21 bill as a crucial move towards a fair regulatory setup that would shift certain oversight duties from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). In regard to the XRP lawsuit, only brief comments by Ripple’s CEO were broadcasted on CBS: “The accusation was that in our sales of XRP we were selling an unregistered security. […] I attended Harvard Business School, and I believe I have a good understanding of what constitutes a security. Therefore, it never crossed my mind that, perhaps, XRP could be classified as a security.

Garlinghouse also discussed the shifting political environment, pointing out President-elect Donald Trump’s change of stance on cryptocurrency. Regarding Trump’s crypto initiative, he commented: “Even if it’s a conflict of interest, the voters have explicitly chosen this individual to be our president. In essence, the electorate has expressed their preference more emphatically than I.

After the broadcast, Garlinghouse voiced his displeasure on X by stating that the segment was inadequate, particularly for not delving deeply into significant updates. He specifically noted that the interview overlooked Judge Analisa Torres’ decision that XRP is not classified as a security. In simpler terms, he tweeted, “60 Minutes disappointingly failed to include the fact that a Federal Judge has ruled XRP is not considered a security…Gensler’s ally (John Reed Stark) should have known better, but chose to make comments that were aired despite this omission.

He added: “Lastly, to say crypto has no utility is exactly what the naysayers said about the Internet in its earliest days – that it’s nothing more than illicit activity. […] Today, even JPMorgan is coming around on blockchain… (conveniently 60 Minutes also failed to mention that Ripple is doing billions of dollars of KYC-ed transactions for our institutional customers – leveraging XRP to move money cross-border more efficiently than traditional payment rails.)”

The Crypto Industry Reacts

As a crypto investor, I found Perianne Boring’s criticism through X particularly insightful. She labeled the discussion segment as a “missed opportunity” for a balanced conversation. Her argument was that the episode misconstrued crypto advocacy as a danger to democracy, overlooking the fundamental First Amendment protections of free speech and property rights embedded in permissionless cryptocurrencies. In essence, she believes we missed out on a chance to discuss crypto’s democratic values and its alignment with essential freedoms.

According to Boring’s remarks, CBSNews fell short in upholding the principles of the First Amendment by overlooking essential truths. Instead, they presented the advocacy of American businesses for these rights as unethical political lobbying, thereby distorting the true implications of the crypto debate.

Additionally, she argued that the segment excessively leaned on John Reed Stark, a former SEC official whose expertise in the crypto field is questionable, which made the opposing argument appear weak. However, the sensationalized discourse overlooked crucial details: cryptocurrency transactions are permanently recorded on a transparent, unchangeable public database known as blockchain. A true expert in crypto crimes would have offered a balanced, evidence-based opinion. Instead, 60 Minutes opted to give a platform to an underqualified individual, damaging its own credibility. It’s surprising that 60 Minutes neglected to question such an evidently flawed claim.

Boring further criticized the portrayal of the SEC’s stance, highlighting the agency’s own regulatory failures, such as the oversight collapse of the FTX exchange. She argued that blaming FTX’s downfall on crypto itself overlooks the lack of a clear regulatory framework in the United States, which she believes created the conditions for FTX’s growth and eventual collapse. “Had the US established a clear, consistent regulatory framework, domestic exchanges could have taken the lead, operating under U.S. oversight to protect investors and prevent fraud,” she noted.

At press time, XRP traded at $2.37.

Read More

2024-12-09 23:42