Amazon’s RoboCop Series Can’t Repeat the 2014 Reboot’s Biggest Flaw

by

Summary

  • RoboCop (1987) prioritized social commentary and dark satire through exaggerated violence and villainous motivations.
  • The 2014 RoboCop reboot failed by taking itself too seriously and ignoring what made the original work.
  • Amazon’s RoboCop series needs to stick to the themes that have been proven to connect with audiences.

In 1987, the character RoboCop made its debut on the big screen with the movie named after it, which was directed by Paul Verhoeven. This film received positive reviews from both critics and audiences, generating enough revenue to pave the way for sequels. Unfortunately, the sequels RoboCop 2 (1990) and RoboCop 3 (1993) were poorly received, leading to a temporary halt in the film series’ production. However, RoboCop continued to be popular in other forms of media.

The character RoboCop was transformed into comic books, where he starred in his own tales and even clashed with other screen legends such as the Terminator. A 1994 TV series based on RoboCop was produced, cleverly bypassing the sequels while continuing somewhat from the original movie. However, it catered to a younger audience, softening the violence and resulting in an underwhelming performance. Additionally, there was the miniseries RoboCop: Prime Directives in 2001, which met with varying opinions. The character didn’t appear in another movie until the 2014 remake of the original story, but it failed to impress fans and never expanded beyond the first film.

Although the character has gained significant popularity and even came close to appearing in a movie by director Neill Blomkamp titled RoboCop Returns, a project which would have been a continuation of the original story, it unfortunately never moved forward. Nevertheless, the video game RoboCop: Rogue City has reignited interest in the character among gamers, providing them with another opportunity to experience elements similar to those found in the initial film. Presently, Amazon is considering reviving RoboCop through a new series, but they must be careful to avoid repeating the mistakes that led to the downfall of the 2014 reboot.

RoboCop Was A Violent Commentary On Society Rife With Dark Satire

As a cinema enthusiast, I’ve often found myself on the receiving end of hasty assessments about the 1987 RoboCop film. At first glance, it might appear to be just another excessive sci-fi flick devoid of meaningful content, but that quick appraisal overlooks the profound insights hidden within its frames. This movie isn’t merely a vehicle for bombastic entertainment; rather, it cleverly employs violence and class structures as a means of commentary. In essence, RoboCop speaks volumes through the thoughtful imagery it presents to viewers. (Much like Verhoeven’s other underestimated sci-fi film, Starship Troopers, which employed fascist imagery in a critique of militarism and political ideologies, but was frequently misconstrued as an alien action movie.)

In the movie RoboCop, the main character Alex Murphy dies quite brutally at the start, transforming him into the title character. This violent scene can sometimes seem comical or exciting due to its extreme nature, but that was director Verhoeven’s intention. He wanted to use satire, which often employs exaggeration to highlight and critique current issues, and Murphy’s gruesome death certainly does that. By showing viewers this unnecessary violence, the movie communicates that it shouldn’t be enjoyed, and this message pervades the film as a whole.

In addition to its portrayal of excessive violence, RoboCop delved into thought-provoking commentary on societal issues. The primary antagonist is Clarence Boddicker, whose criminal activities terrorize the city. However, the real villains are unveiled as Omni Consumer Products and their CEO, Dick Jones, who embody the dangers of corporate greed and the misuse of power in executive suites. RoboCop underscores how corporate dominance leads to societal decay, with citizens living in a grim, dystopian reality.

Some viewers might consider “RoboCop” just another action movie. However, its message delves much deeper, similar to insightful discussions on television game shows, subtly reflecting the impact of media on society. This depth is evident even in the film’s minor details, mirroring Paul Verhoeven’s intended vision.

The 2014 RoboCop Reboot Took Itself Too Seriously

Whenever an established franchise is given a fresh start through a reboot or remake, fans tend to feel anxious rather than thrilled because there’s a concern that the unique elements which originally made the property stand out might get lost in the process. This was the case with the 2014 remake of RoboCop. The remake assembled a competent team, with José Padilha, renowned for his action movies like Elite Squad and Elite Squad 2: The Enemy Within, taking on the director’s role. The cast featured Joel Kinnaman as Alex Murphy, alongside Gary Oldman, Michael Keaton, and Samuel L. Jackson. Despite the impressive lineup, the filmmakers made a questionable decision in steering the movie down a path it arguably shouldn’t have taken.

2014’s version of RoboCop emphasized Murphy’s gruesome predicament, centering the film around his internal battle between his human and robotic identity. Despite having an emotional depth to the character, the remake opted for a less violent approach, adjusting the content to earn a PG-13 rating. This compromise might have been acceptable if they hadn’t also diminished the thought-provoking social commentary it originally contained.

The remake of the movie seemed overly focused on creating an action-packed film, neglecting the opportunity to develop the witty commentary and dark satire that characterized the 1987 original. Instead of adapting the film’s core themes by mocking modern societal issues as the original did, it fell short, offering typical sci-fi action. Many fans of the original RoboCop were disappointed by this direction, leading to poor box office performance in the U.S. The remake ended up being a version of RoboCop that most viewers didn’t recognize or appreciate, highlighting what they seem to have missed about the original’s unique appeal.

Amazon’s RoboCop Series Needs To Embrace More Than Aesthetics

In a different phrasing, James Wan, known for directing films such as “The Conjuring” and “Saw,” is serving as an executive producer for Amazon’s “Robocop” series. Interestingly, Peter Ocko, the creator of “Moonhaven,” has been appointed as the showrunner. However, it’s important to note that Irvin Kershner, who directed “The Empire Strikes Back,” was at the helm for the critically-disappointing “RoboCop 2.” This just goes to show that even talented creatives don’t always guarantee success. In terms of what we can expect from the series, Variety has shared a synopsis suggesting that it aims to stay true to the original spirit of “Robocop.”

A major technological corporation teams up with the city’s law enforcement agency to launch an innovative peacekeeper – a hybrid of human and technology – to address increasing criminal activity.

In light of the favorable reception towards “RoboCop: Rogue City” and the less successful 2014 remake, it’s evident that the franchise needs to focus on certain elements to please fans. They desire a portrayal of the character and world that is insightful, satirical, and delves into what it means to be human. The series could potentially benefit from following a legacy sequel model, similar to Neill Blomkamp’s “RoboCop Returns,” which aimed to disregard subsequent films and return to what made the 1987 film successful. Franchises like “Halloween” have managed to achieve this successfully. Although details about Amazon’s “RoboCop” series are still undisclosed, it’s crucial for the creators to learn from the franchise’s past errors and emphasize the aspects that resonate with viewers.

Read More

2025-05-05 23:06