Beyond Passwords: Securing Identities with Quantum Biometrics

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A new approach combines the strengths of post-quantum cryptography and quantum key distribution to fortify biometric authentication in decentralized networks.

This review proposes a layered security protocol leveraging QKD and post-quantum algorithms to enable scalable and robust biometric authentication for decentralized systems and smart city infrastructure.

While decentralized systems offer enhanced privacy and scalability for biometric authentication-critical for emerging smart city infrastructures-they introduce vulnerabilities to quantum computing attacks. This challenge is addressed in ‘Quantum Secure Biometric Authentication in Decentralised Systems’, which proposes a novel protocol combining post-quantum cryptography and quantum key distribution to establish secure communication between devices. The layered approach achieves a key generation rate of 15 bits/sec via simulation, ensuring both classical and quantum channels are resilient to modern threats. Could this framework pave the way for truly secure and scalable digital identity solutions in increasingly interconnected urban environments?

The Inevitable Fracture: Quantum Computing and the Pillars of Trust

The bedrock of modern internet security, public-key algorithms like RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), face a significant challenge from the advent of quantum computing. These algorithms rely on the computational difficulty of certain mathematical problems – factoring large numbers for RSA and solving the discrete logarithm problem for ECC. However, Shor’s algorithm, a quantum algorithm developed in 1994, provides a dramatically faster method for solving both of these problems. While classical computers would take an impractically long time to crack the encryption used in these systems, a sufficiently powerful quantum computer running Shor’s algorithm could, in theory, break these encryptions in hours or even minutes. This vulnerability doesn’t immediately compromise current encrypted data, but it creates a critical risk for long-term data security, as adversaries could store encrypted information today and decrypt it once quantum computers become readily available. The threat posed by Shor’s algorithm is therefore driving urgent research into new, quantum-resistant cryptographic methods.

The anticipated arrival of fault-tolerant quantum computers presents a fundamental challenge to modern cryptography, driving intensive research into alternative security protocols. Current public-key systems, while secure against the best-known classical algorithms, are demonstrably vulnerable to Shor’s algorithm when executed on a sufficiently powerful quantum computer. This necessitates a proactive shift towards post-quantum cryptography (PQC), which focuses on developing cryptographic systems that resist attacks from both classical computers and potential quantum adversaries. These new methods leverage mathematical problems believed to be hard for both types of computers, such as lattice-based cryptography, code-based cryptography, multivariate cryptography, and hash-based signatures. The development and standardization of PQC algorithms are crucial to ensuring the continued confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity of digital communications and data in a post-quantum world, protecting everything from financial transactions to government secrets.

The impending arrival of sufficiently powerful quantum computers poses a critical risk to currently deployed public-key cryptography, demanding a proactive shift towards post-quantum cryptography. Existing algorithms, like RSA and ECC, which underpin much of modern secure communication – from online banking to government secrets – are theoretically breakable by Shor’s algorithm when executed on a quantum computer. This isn’t a distant concern; data encrypted today could be vulnerable years from now when quantum computers mature, necessitating long-term security considerations. The transition involves researching, standardizing, and implementing new cryptographic algorithms resistant to both classical and quantum attacks, a complex undertaking requiring global collaboration and significant investment. Failure to adapt could result in widespread data breaches, compromised systems, and a fundamental erosion of trust in digital infrastructure, emphasizing the urgency of securing communications for the future.

Lattice Geometry: A Fortress Against the Quantum Tide

Lattice-based cryptography secures data by leveraging the computational difficulty of solving certain mathematical problems defined on lattices – specifically, regular arrays of points in space. Unlike widely used public-key algorithms such as RSA and ECC, which are vulnerable to Shor’s algorithm when executed on a quantum computer, the presumed hardness of lattice problems, such as the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) and the Closest Vector Problem (CVP), remains intact even with quantum computational capabilities. This resistance stems from the lack of known efficient quantum algorithms for solving these lattice problems, providing a post-quantum security foundation. The security parameter is typically determined by the lattice dimension and the size of the lattice basis, directly impacting the computational cost for potential attackers.

Learning With Errors (LWE) is a mathematical problem forming the basis of many lattice-based cryptographic schemes. It involves distinguishing between uniformly random vectors and vectors perturbed by small, random noise. Formally, given a matrix \textbf{A} and an error vector \textbf{e}, the problem consists of determining whether \textbf{A}\textbf{s} + \textbf{e} is a sample from the distribution \textbf{A}\textbf{s} + \chi (where χ represents the noise) or a uniformly random vector. The presumed hardness of solving LWE, even with quantum algorithms, provides the security guarantee; the difficulty scales polynomially with the dimension of the lattice and inversely with the magnitude of the noise. Variations like Ring-LWE further enhance efficiency by performing computations in ring structures, making LWE a particularly attractive foundation for constructing public-key encryption, key exchange, and digital signature schemes.

ML-KEM (Module-Lattice-based Key Encapsulation Mechanism) is a public-key encryption scheme designed for secure key exchange. It operates by encapsulating a symmetric key using a public key, allowing two parties to establish a shared secret over an insecure channel. The scheme’s security is rooted in the hardness of the Module-LWE (Learning With Errors) problem, offering resistance against attacks from both classical and quantum computers. Specifically, ML-KEM utilizes structured lattices and efficient algorithms for key generation, encapsulation, and decapsulation, enabling practical performance in various communication protocols. It was selected as an alternate candidate in the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization process, highlighting its maturity and potential for widespread adoption in securing digital communications.

Beyond Encryption: Decentralization and Quantum Resilience

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) establishes a secure key between two parties by leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics; unlike traditional cryptographic methods reliant on computational complexity, QKD’s security is guaranteed by the laws of physics, specifically the uncertainty principle and the no-cloning theorem. Implementations such as Measurement-Device-Independent QKD (MDI-QKD) remove all detector side-channel attacks, while Twin Field QKD (TF-QKD) extends transmission distances significantly by referencing a single source. These protocols generate and distribute a symmetric key that can then be used with conventional symmetric encryption algorithms like AES. QKD is not a replacement for post-quantum cryptography (PQC), but a complementary technology; PQC algorithms aim to be resistant to attacks from quantum computers, while QKD provides a provably secure key exchange mechanism today, independent of future advances in computing power. The combination of QKD for key distribution and PQC for encryption/signatures offers a robust defense against both classical and quantum threats.

Decentralized systems improve data security by distributing data across multiple nodes, thereby eliminating single points of failure common in centralized architectures. Blockchain technology achieves this through immutable, cryptographically secured ledgers, ensuring data integrity and auditability. Federated Learning extends this concept by enabling model training on decentralized data sources without direct data exchange, preserving data privacy. Each participating node retains control over its data, and only model updates are shared, minimizing the risk of large-scale data breaches. The distributed nature of these systems also enhances resilience against denial-of-service attacks and malicious data manipulation, as compromising a single node does not necessarily compromise the entire system.

Homomorphic Encryption (HE) enables computation directly on ciphertext without requiring decryption, thereby preserving data confidentiality throughout processing. Schemes like Paillier utilize asymmetric cryptography and are additively homomorphic, suitable for applications involving summation and statistical analysis of encrypted data. More complex schemes, such as the Fan-Vercauteren scheme (FV), are fully homomorphic, supporting arbitrary computations – addition and multiplication – on encrypted data. This capability is particularly beneficial in decentralized architectures where data owners may not trust the computing entity, allowing sensitive data to be processed without exposing the underlying plaintext and minimizing the risk of data breaches or privacy violations. The computational overhead associated with HE remains a significant factor in practical deployments, but ongoing research aims to improve efficiency and scalability.

The Authentication Horizon: Biometrics and the Quantum Future

Biometric authentication represents a significant evolution in security protocols, moving beyond easily compromised knowledge-based systems – such as passwords and PINs – toward inherent personal characteristics for verification. Methods like fingerprint scanning, facial recognition, iris scanning, and voice pattern analysis offer a compelling blend of heightened security and improved user experience. These technologies authenticate individuals based on who they are, rather than what they know, making them considerably more resistant to traditional attacks like phishing or brute-force hacking. Furthermore, the convenience of biometric systems – eliminating the need to remember complex passwords or carry physical tokens – encourages broader adoption and simplifies access control across a range of applications, from unlocking personal devices to securing sensitive data and physical locations. This shift not only enhances security but also streamlines user interactions, fostering a more seamless and intuitive digital experience.

The convergence of biometric authentication with decentralized architectures and post-quantum cryptography represents a paradigm shift in securing digital identities and access. Traditional centralized systems, vulnerable to single points of failure and large-scale data breaches, are being reimagined through distributed ledger technologies like blockchain. By anchoring biometric data – such as fingerprint templates or facial recognition vectors – on a decentralized network, the risk of compromise is significantly reduced. However, the looming threat of quantum computing necessitates cryptographic methods resilient to quantum attacks. Integrating post-quantum cryptographic algorithms – designed to withstand attacks from both classical and quantum computers – with these decentralized biometric systems creates a robust and future-proof authentication framework. This layered approach not only fortifies identity verification but also empowers individuals with greater control over their personal data, paving the way for more secure and privacy-respecting digital interactions.

A newly developed biometric authentication protocol showcases a considerable leap forward in secure access technologies. This system achieves a key generation rate of 15 bits per second, signifying a swift and reliable method for establishing cryptographic keys directly from biometric data. Crucially, the protocol operates with an efficiency of 89%, meaning a minimal loss of information during the key generation process. These performance metrics suggest the system’s potential to provide robust security against both classical and future quantum computing attacks, offering a pathway to more resilient identity verification and access control in increasingly vulnerable digital landscapes. The combination of speed and efficiency positions this quantum-secure approach as a promising solution for safeguarding sensitive data and critical infrastructure.

The pursuit of absolute security, as detailed in this exploration of biometric authentication within decentralized systems, mirrors a fundamental human condition. It is a striving for a fixed point in a universe defined by change. As Blaise Pascal observed, “All of humanity’s problems stem from man’s inability to sit quietly in a room alone.” This seemingly unrelated observation speaks to the core of the challenge. The layered protocol – combining post-quantum cryptography and quantum key distribution – isn’t about achieving perfect security, but about building a system resilient enough to adapt to inevitable shifts in the threat landscape. Long stability, celebrated by many, merely masks the slow accumulation of unforeseen vulnerabilities. The system doesn’t fail; it evolves, demanding continuous recalibration and acceptance of its inherent impermanence.

What Lies Ahead?

The layering of post-quantum cryptography atop quantum key distribution isn’t a solution, precisely. It’s a deferral. Each cryptographic advance merely delays the inevitable entropy, pushing the point of compromise further into the future – a future built on assumptions about attacker capabilities that will, inevitably, prove optimistic. The protocol described here doesn’t prevent failure; it buys time, and time is a resource rapidly consumed by Moore’s law on both sides of the equation.

The real challenge isn’t key exchange, it’s the ecosystem. Decentralized systems are rarely static. Biometric data itself shifts-aging, injury, even simple changes in expression introduce drift. The protocol, as presented, addresses the initial handshake, but says little of continuous authentication or the adaptive re-keying needed to account for real-world data degradation. Each deployment is a small apocalypse, a carefully constructed failure mode waiting for the right conditions.

The focus will inevitably shift from theoretical security to practical resilience. The question won’t be “can this be broken?” but “how long will it usefully resist breakage?” Documentation, of course, will be of limited value. No one writes prophecies after they come true. The next iteration won’t be about stronger encryption, but about systems that gracefully degrade, that accept compromise as a fundamental property, and that minimize the blast radius when, not if, the inevitable happens.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.04852.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-01-09 08:46