Beyond Summation: A New Path for Quantum Perturbation Theory

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

Researchers have developed a novel algorithm that simplifies calculations of quantum eigenstates by eliminating the need for summing over intermediate states, offering a complete analytical solution for a wide range of potentials.

The Supersymmetric Expansion Algorithm reduces perturbative calculations to quadrature forms, leveraging the logarithmic Schrödinger equation and nodeless solutions.

Conventional Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory relies on summing over intermediate states, a process often computationally demanding and analytically intractable. This work presents a novel approach, detailed in ‘Stationary perturbation theory without sums over intermediate states: Supersymmetric Expansion Algorithm’, which circumvents this limitation through a supersymmetric expansion algorithm (SEA). The SEA reduces perturbative calculations for all quantum eigenstates to quadrature forms, yielding direct corrections to energy and eigenstates via integrals weighted by edge state probability densities. Could this formalism offer a pathway to analytically solvable models for a broader class of quantum mechanical potentials and beyond?

The Unfolding of Quantum States

The behavior of quantum systems, from the simplest atom to complex molecular interactions, is fundamentally dictated by the time-dependent Schrödinger Equation. This equation describes how the quantum state of a physical system evolves in time, acting as the cornerstone of quantum mechanics. Essentially, it posits that knowing the initial quantum state allows, in principle, the prediction of its state at any future time. While seemingly straightforward, solving the Schrödinger Equation analytically is only possible for a limited number of idealized systems; for most realistic scenarios, approximations or numerical methods become essential to understand and predict the dynamics of these quantum phenomena, impacting fields ranging from materials science to drug discovery.

The Schrödinger equation, a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, describes how a quantum system evolves over time. While elegantly simple in its formulation – i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} |\Psi(t)\rangle = H |\Psi(t)\rangle – its application to even moderately complex systems quickly encounters significant computational hurdles. The equation’s solution requires determining the time evolution of the system’s wavefunction, a task whose demands scale exponentially with the number of particles involved. This means that simulating realistic materials, molecules, or even a relatively small number of interacting quantum particles necessitates computational resources that rapidly exceed the capabilities of even the most powerful supercomputers. Consequently, physicists and chemists routinely grapple with the challenge of finding effective strategies to approximate solutions, acknowledging that a full, exact solution remains often unattainable for systems beyond the most trivial.

While the Schrödinger equation provides a complete description of quantum system evolution, its analytical solutions are limited to a select few simple cases. For most realistic scenarios – involving many interacting particles or complex potentials – approximations become essential. Traditional perturbative methods, for instance, rely on weak interactions and can fail dramatically when these conditions aren’t met, yielding inaccurate or meaningless results. Similarly, variational methods, while more robust, require careful selection of trial wavefunctions, a process that introduces further approximations and potentially obscures the true ground state. These inherent limitations drive ongoing research into more sophisticated approximation techniques, including those leveraging computational power and novel algorithmic approaches, to accurately model and predict the behavior of increasingly complex quantum systems, such as those encountered in materials science and quantum chemistry.

Dimensionality Reduction: A Pathway to Tractability

The Schrödinger equation, when applied to multi-dimensional systems, presents significant computational challenges due to the increased complexity of the potential energy functions and the resulting partial differential equations. Reducing the problem to one spatial dimension-by considering motion restricted to a line or by exploiting symmetries in the potential-drastically reduces the computational burden. This simplification stems from replacing the three-dimensional Laplacian operator \nabla^2 with its one-dimensional counterpart \frac{d^2}{dx^2} , leading to a simpler ordinary differential equation that can often be solved analytically or numerically with greater ease. While a limitation, this approach remains valid for modeling numerous physical systems where motion in certain directions is negligible or effectively constrained, such as electrons confined to a quantum wire or particles in a highly asymmetric potential.

The simplification to a one-dimensional Schrödinger equation is frequently achieved in systems possessing a central potential, V(r). This potential symmetry allows for the separation of variables in the three-dimensional Schrödinger equation, specifically utilizing spherical coordinates (r, \theta, \phi). The wavefunction \Psi(r, \theta, \phi) can then be expressed as a product of radial and angular components: \Psi(r, \theta, \phi) = R(r)Y(\theta, \phi), where R(r) describes the radial behavior and Y(\theta, \phi) represents the angular portion – the spherical harmonics. Consequently, the radial equation, which governs the behavior of R(r), becomes a one-dimensional problem dependent only on the radial coordinate r, significantly reducing computational complexity while still accurately describing the system’s quantum mechanical behavior.

The one-dimensional Schrödinger equation, derived from simplification of the full three-dimensional problem, allows for analytical or numerical solutions applicable to a range of physical systems. These include modeling particle confinement within infinite and finite potential wells, analyzing quantum tunneling through potential barriers, and determining the energy levels of harmonic oscillators – all situations where the potential energy experienced by the particle is primarily dependent on a single spatial coordinate. Furthermore, the solutions to the one-dimensional problem serve as foundational approximations for more complex, multi-dimensional systems, particularly when considering scenarios where the motion can be effectively separated into independent one-dimensional components, such as in the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom where radial and angular components are treated separately. The resulting wavefunctions, \Psi(x), and corresponding energy eigenvalues, E_n, provide quantitative predictions for observable phenomena in these systems.

Beyond Perturbation: Evolving Strategies for Accuracy

Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory is a foundational technique in quantum mechanics used to approximate the energy levels and corresponding eigenstates of a quantum system when an exact solution is unavailable. The method involves expressing the Hamiltonian as a sum of a solvable part H_0 and a small perturbation V, allowing for the calculation of energy corrections and first-order changes to the unperturbed eigenstates. Higher-order corrections are determined through iterative application of the perturbation, requiring the summation over all intermediate states, a process that becomes computationally intensive and prone to convergence problems as the order increases. The resulting energy corrections, to nth order, are proportional to powers of the perturbation parameter λ, enabling an approximate determination of the system’s energy eigenvalues and eigenstates when V is sufficiently small.

Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory, while fundamentally important, necessitates the calculation of energy corrections by summing contributions from all intermediate states. This summation process scales with the number of these states, resulting in significant computational cost, particularly for complex systems with a large Hilbert space. Furthermore, the convergence of this summation is not guaranteed; for non-convergent series, the calculated energy corrections become increasingly inaccurate as more intermediate states are included, necessitating careful consideration of truncation criteria and potentially leading to unreliable results. This limitation restricts the practical application of the traditional approach to systems where the number of relevant intermediate states is manageable and the perturbation is sufficiently weak to ensure convergence.

The Logarithmic Schrödinger Equation offers a distinct approach to perturbation theory, bypassing the computational challenges associated with summing over intermediate states in traditional methods like Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory. This formulation achieves solutions accurate to third order in the perturbation parameter λ, as verified through calculations performed on the simple model system of a particle in a box. Specifically, energy corrections to the ground and first excited states have been computed up to λ³, demonstrating the equation’s capacity to provide high-order corrections without the typical convergence issues encountered in standard perturbative expansions.

The supersymmetric expansion algorithm (SEA) provides an analytical solution for the complete energy spectrum of quantum systems by reformulating calculations into quadrature forms, thereby eliminating the need for summation over intermediate states that characterize traditional perturbation methods. This approach has been successfully verified across a range of potentials, including the Yukawa, HulthĂ©n, anharmonic oscillator, and Cornell potentials, delivering energy eigenvalue expressions accurate to third order in the perturbation parameter λ – as detailed in equations 71 and 76. The resulting formalism allows for direct calculation of eigenvalues without the computational expense and potential convergence issues associated with conventional perturbation theory.

The presented work bypasses traditional perturbative calculations by cleverly avoiding sums over intermediate states, achieving analytical solutions through the supersymmetric expansion algorithm. This approach resonates with a sentiment articulated by Blaise Pascal: “The eloquence of angels is not heard in the roar of the wind, but in the stillness.” Just as Pascal suggests finding profundity in simplicity, this algorithm discovers complete solutions not through complex summation, but by reframing the problem into quadrature forms. The algorithm’s focus on inherent order-revealing solutions from the structure of the logarithmic Schrödinger equation-highlights that governance, even in quantum mechanics, emerges from local rules rather than imposed control. Every connection between the superpotential and eigenstates carries influence, demonstrating self-organization in action.

Where to Now?

The presented supersymmetric expansion algorithm demonstrably sidesteps the conventional reliance on sums over intermediate states – a conceptually neat trick, though not, perhaps, a fundamentally new physics. The insistence on quadrature forms, while elegant, merely reshuffles the computational burden, not necessarily lessening it. The true test lies not in solving known potentials, but in confronting those for which analytical treatment remains elusive – potentials where the very structure of the superpotential hints at emergent phenomena.

A natural progression involves extending this formalism beyond the confines of the logarithmic Schrödinger equation. The algorithm’s success hinges on a specific symmetry; exploring its limitations, and the degree to which it can be adapted to systems lacking that symmetry, will prove crucial. One suspects that attempts to force such a framework onto inherently chaotic systems will reveal the boundaries of its applicability – and, more interestingly, illuminate the origins of complexity itself.

It is worth remembering that order doesn’t need architects; it emerges from local rules. The algorithm offers a tool for describing order, but not necessarily creating it. Sometimes inaction-allowing the system to reveal its structure without imposed analytical constraints-is the best tool. The future likely resides in a synthesis: using this approach to map the contours of solvable systems, then stepping back to observe where, and how, those solutions break down.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.09436.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-01-16 02:32