Can Disney’s One Live-Action Remake Save Its Failing Empire?

by

The Walt Disney Company frequently faces challenges as their expansive domain seems to become increasingly unmanageable. Regrettably, they appear to have a single strategy that they consistently apply to address any situation. Disney seldom innovates nowadays; instead, they often rehash concepts created by their original creators, which range from 20 to 100 years old. They then polish these ideas with more advanced graphics but seem to struggle with execution. This approach has brought them significant financial gains, harsh criticisms from both critics and audiences, and a decline in returns. However, it did work once, resulting in the release of 2016’s The Jungle Book.

In today’s big-screen entertainment landscape, nostalgia is turning out to be a complex notion. Most film enthusiasts claim they yearn for something fresh from the next blockbuster sensation. Regrettably, they often overlook these innovative offerings and flock towards rehashed versions instead. However, there appears to be some resistance, as 2023 marked the first time in decades that original films occupied the top three earnings positions at the box office. This trend was short-lived, with 2024 witnessing a return to tradition, featuring just one original adaptation amidst numerous sequels, collaborations, and remake-prequels in the top five.

Disney’s Live-Action Snow White Remake is Struggling

Director Marc Webb
Writer Erin Cressida Wilson
Stars Rachel Zegler, Andrew Burnap, and Gal Gadot
Release Date March 21, 2025
Opening Weekend Box-Office $42,206,415

In 2025, the remake of Disney’s “Snow White” stands as the 20th most expensive film ever produced without adjusting for inflation, and it remains in the top 100 when considering inflation. Most films that surpass it were also produced by Disney, although many of them recouped their costs and more. The production cost of Marc Webb’s “Snow White” ranged from $240 to $270 million, making its $42 million opening weekend a significant disappointment. Numerous factors contributed to this unexpected failure. In today’s political climate, Disney faced backlash for casting non-white actors in the film, angering internet trolls and hate groups. The studio faced criticism from these groups over the casting of Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot, as well as protests against Israel’s treatment of Palestine. Moreover, the movie deviated significantly from the original storyline, disappointing die-hard fans who sought a more expensive adaptation of their beloved 88-year-old cartoon. Controversy surrounded the film from the beginning, providing ample reasons for audiences to avoid it. It is possible that people stayed away due to the numerous soulless live-action remakes Disney has produced in recent years, leading many viewers to skip this film despite its controversy.

The Jungle Book May Be the Only Good Live-Action Remake

The Jungle Book” is one of Disney’s costliest live-action remakes, although its ‘live-action’ label is debatable because the animals are still animated, just with advanced technology compared to earlier versions. However, unlike other remakes, “The Jungle Book” is highly praised for delivering on its promises and creatively blending the original story with previous adaptations. Despite having many similarities with other films of this type, “The Jungle Book” manages to be unique in a way that goes against its origins. It has a star-studded voice cast, a substantial budget, and numerous familiar references. While it’s not perfect, it is the most notable example of this genre.

Could Future Live-Action Remakes Learn a Lesson?

1. It seems unlikely that Disney will cease their current practices, despite the fact that Snow White might miss its financial target by several million dollars.
2. If The Jungle Book teaches us anything, it’s a sad reminder of how vague things can be. The movie thrives because it possesses an emotional depth that is scarcely found in most similar productions. The other movies often appear contrived, dark, and devoid of soul, squandering any opportunity to connect with audiences. This is the unfortunate paradox of these films; they prosper by capitalizing on nostalgia, but can only endure by surpassing their predecessors. They require the same elements as any other mega-franchise: a visionary creator and the courage to bring that vision to life. It’s an artistic void where even the best examples find it difficult to generate enough revenue to stay afloat while the biggest names dominate the limelight. The only solution is for movies like Snow White to fail spectacularly.

The success of The Lion King has significantly impacted Disney’s current status, leading them to continue attempting similar ventures repeatedly. A single success can dictate their strategies for a long time, but it may take multiple failures to break this pattern. The Jungle Book could serve as a better model, but The Lion King remains Disney’s ambitious goal until they experience enough setbacks to rethink their approach. Authenticity is challenging to mimic, and perhaps Disney will eventually recognize the missing element. Director Jon Favreau abandoned The Jungle Book 2 to focus on The Lion King. Those who aren’t already boycotting Snow White might consider doing so as a remote hope that Disney may alter its course.

Read More

2025-03-27 19:25