How to Make Dexter: Resurrection the Ultimate Finale: 3 Key Steps

Summary

  • Dexter: Resurrection has a chance to give Dexter a satisfying ending by honoring his moral complexity.
  • The series should deliver earned consequences and a proper resolution for Dexter and his son, Harrison.
  • Dexter: Resurrection has the opportunity to conclude Harrison’s story without setting up another spin-off.

Resurrection” series has a great chance to bring closure to Dexter Morgan’s story in a way that will please fans, as previous attempts fell short and left many unsatisfied with the ending of this beloved, morally ambiguous serial killer character who targets only evil individuals.

Essentially, he predominantly targets the wicked. However, it’s important to remember that no one is flawless; this notion has been reiterated numerous times throughout the initial series.

The initial series ending left viewers disillusioned, as Dexter was portrayed as a one-dimensional villain instead of the complex character he once was. His transformation from a brilliant blood spatter analyst and nighttime vigilante to a solitary logger on the West Coast was met with disappointment by fans. When it was announced that the show would return under the title Dexter: New Blood, there was optimism that the original creative team could rectify the situation and provide Dexter with a fitting farewell. However, this hope was dashed when Dexter was supposedly killed by his son, Harrison. As the release date for Dexter: Resurrection approaches, fans are anxious, praying that this time it will be different.

The positive aspect is that the show appears to have plans for several seasons, allowing the writers ample opportunity to devise a fitting conclusion for the ongoing anti-hero character. In the interim, here’s what the producers should focus on to guarantee a satisfying resolution this time around.

Dexter: Resurrection Has To Honor Dexter’s Moral Complexity, Not Just His Thirst to Kill

To ensure that “Dexter: Resurrection” delivers a satisfying ending, it’s crucial to revisit the fundamentals and recapture the intrigue that marked the original series. This intrigue stemmed from the conflict between Dexter’s strict moral code, known as the “Code of Harry,” and his unquenchable desire for bloodshed.

In a captivating twist, the globally renowned serial killer delivers his finest storytelling moments not just by eliminating evil individuals, which is generally accepted by the series’ followers in an unsettling manner. Instead, it’s when he grapples with the question of whether any ethical standard can truly validate the darkness residing within him, offering a thought-provoking exploration of morality and inner turmoil.

Enthusiasts eagerly anticipating “Dexter: Resurrection” are hoping for an ending that’s more about deep, psychological reflection rather than grand spectacle. They seek a closure that offers them a sense of release or relief.

Dexter: Resurrection Must Deliver Consequences That Feel Earned And Deserved

For fans of both the original series and New Blood, one of the most vexing elements was that Dexter often managed to avoid the repercussions of his actions. While he may have been portrayed as a sort of dark hero, taking out so-called “waste,” it wasn’t driven by any moral or justice-seeking motive. Instead, he is undeniably a serial killer, fueled by an uncontrollable urge to kill.

Without the “Code of Harry,” Dexter would have unjustly taken the lives of innocent people, making him a relentless killer by nature. His actions, which are based on his personal interpretation of right and wrong, deprive others of fair trials. In essence, he is no different from the very victims he kills. This is something he himself acknowledges frequently.

In the narrative of “Dexter: Resurrection”, there should be a sequence where Dexter, the Bay Harbor Butcher, stands trial. This trial will expose him, stripping away his mask in the public eye, and will result in society’s rejection of him, considering him no different than the criminals he had disposed of by chopping and burying at sea.

Fans who have endured years of seeing Dexter present himself as a decent person while causing harm to those around him might find it satisfying when he ultimately faces consequences that reflect his morally ambiguous existence, given his long struggle between being perceived as a hero and a monster.

Dexter: Resurrection Should Expand Harrison’s Story, Then Resolve It — Don’t Repeat The Cycle

In my perspective, one more challenge that the revival series, “Dexter: Resurrection,” will need to address is the reintroduction of Harrison, Dexter’s grown-up son, who carries the dark legacy in his blood, much like his father. The narrative positioned Harrison as the thematic successor to Dexter’s darkness. However, they left his future open-ended, which could prove risky since there seems to be no clear follow-up plan for his character arc.

Redemption for Harrison must involve crafting a narrative arc that will either depict him triumphantly escaping the shadows of his father’s troubled past, or alternatively, in a unique and compelling manner, finding himself entangled once again, serving as the greatest torment for Dexter, who yearned for better for his son.

The idea for the second story is particularly captivating. Dexter often regretted and grieved over being brought into existence through the tragic and gruesome murder of his mother. If Harrison were to turn out like him, it would be psychologically devastating for Dexter, putting him on par with those who killed his mom and ignited his dark side. This kind of moral retribution is what fans are eager to witness.

Ultimately, they must find a way to wrap up Harrison’s tale without using it as a foundation for yet another spin-off. Instead, they should bring it to a close, put a period at the end of the sentence, and leave it be. That’s all folks!

Dexter: Resurrection Should Be The End Of The Franchise And Provide Closure The Fandom Needs

Following numerous errors and close calls, Dexter Morgan has deservedly reached a concluding phase that honors his dark side and intricate nature – traits that catapulted him into pop culture stardom, ensuring his enduring relevance. If Dexter: Resurrection manages to acknowledge the ethical gray areas inherent in Dexter’s tale, present substantial repercussions that seem predestined from the outset, and develop Harrison’s narrative with depth, it will satisfy fans who have longed for a sense of finality since the original series concluded.

As a devoted cinephile who’s always had a soft spot for the complex character of Dexter Morgan, I can’t help but ponder over the potential ending of the proposed revival, “Dexter: Resurrection”. It’s not about providing him with an easy exit, but rather imbuing his legacy with significance – a fitting conclusion for a franchise that has thrived on blood, justice, and the gray areas between right and wrong. The question remains, can this series actually pull off a satisfying resolution?

Read More

2025-05-01 01:07