Quantum Scars Reveal Hidden Symmetries

Author: Denis Avetisyan


New research demonstrates that these unusual quantum states possess a surprising topological character, opening doors for advanced quantum technologies.

The framework defines a twist operator within a general space of operators <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">G</span>, specifically isolating those that preserve the scar subspace <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">SGA</span> and those maintaining the commutants or individual scar wavefunctions <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">C</span>, thereby enabling detection of underlying symmetry types.
The framework defines a twist operator within a general space of operators G, specifically isolating those that preserve the scar subspace SGA and those maintaining the commutants or individual scar wavefunctions C, thereby enabling detection of underlying symmetry types.

The discovery unveils a symmetry-protected topological phase in quantum many-body scars, detectable via a novel twist operator and characterized by super-extensive scaling of the Quantum Fisher Information.

While many-body localized systems are known to resist thermalization, the origins of stability in emergent quantum many-body scars remain an open question. This work, ‘Hidden $Z_{2}\times Z_{2}$ subspace symmetry protection for quantum scars’, reveals that these scars possess a symmetry-protected topological (SPT) character arising from a hidden Z_{2}\times Z_{2} symmetry of the commutant Hamiltonian. Demonstrated through a novel Lieb-Schultz-Mattis (LSM) twist operator and characterized by super-extensive scaling of the Quantum Fisher Information, this protection suggests potential applications in quantum metrology and information processing. Could understanding this hidden symmetry unlock new strategies for stabilizing and manipulating quantum information in complex systems?


The Illusion of Stability: Quantum Scars and Hidden Rules

Quantum scars represent a fascinating departure from expected behavior in many-body quantum systems. Typically, these complex systems rapidly scramble quantum information, a process known as thermalization, where energy distributes evenly and distinguishing initial states becomes impossible. However, certain specific states resist this tendency, remaining remarkably localized and stable against perturbations. These ‘scarred’ states aren’t simply accidental anomalies; they exhibit an unexpected robustness, preserving quantum coherence for timescales far exceeding what conventional wisdom would predict. This resistance to thermalization suggests the presence of underlying, often hidden, symmetries or conservation laws that protect these states from decay, offering a potential pathway for maintaining quantum information and manipulating these systems for advanced applications.

Quantum systems, when sufficiently complex, typically evolve towards thermalization – a state of maximal entropy where information is lost to randomness. However, the emergence of quantum scars presents a striking deviation from this expectation; certain localized states remain coherent and persist even within highly chaotic systems. This resistance to thermalization isn’t an anomaly, but rather a signal of hidden, underlying symmetries within the system’s dynamics. These symmetries, often subtle and non-obvious, constrain the system’s evolution, protecting these scarred states from the usual decay into thermal noise. Researchers posit that identifying and characterizing these symmetries is paramount to understanding why these scars form, and opens the door to manipulating these non-thermal states for potential applications in quantum technologies, as the coherent nature of these states suggests a pathway for preserving quantum information.

The potential for quantum scars to revolutionize information processing stems from their atypical stability and localized nature, demanding a deep understanding of the symmetries that protect them. Recent research demonstrates a compelling link between these symmetries and the system’s capacity for precision measurement; specifically, the Quantum Fisher Information (QFI) – a benchmark for parameter estimation – scales super-extensively with system size, denoted as ~N. This means that as the number of particles (N) increases, the precision with which a system can encode and retrieve information grows dramatically – far exceeding the capabilities of typical, thermalizing quantum systems. This super-extensive scaling of the QFI isn’t merely a theoretical curiosity; it suggests that scarred landscapes provide an inherent advantage for building robust quantum sensors and potentially, fault-tolerant quantum computers, as the system’s ability to maintain quantum coherence and resist noise is directly amplified by these hidden symmetries.

The twist operator <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\langle U(\\theta)\\rangle</span> for a system size of L=8 and perturbation <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\epsilon=0.05</span> reveals putative scars forming a deformed circle, consistent with numerical observations (Fig. 2), but these mix with ETH predictions at larger sizes, while states near the spectral edges lack sufficient density to confidently confirm deviations from the unit circle.
The twist operator \langle U(\\theta)\\rangle for a system size of L=8 and perturbation \epsilon=0.05 reveals putative scars forming a deformed circle, consistent with numerical observations (Fig. 2), but these mix with ETH predictions at larger sizes, while states near the spectral edges lack sufficient density to confidently confirm deviations from the unit circle.

The Commutant Algebra: Defining Symmetry from First Principles

The commutant algebra, in the context of symmetry analysis, is formed by the set of all operators that commute with a given operator, typically the Hamiltonian \hat{H} . Formally, the commutant is defined as \mathcal{C}(\hat{H}) = \{ \hat{A} | [\hat{H}, \hat{A}] = 0 \} , where [\hat{H}, \hat{A}] represents the commutator of \hat{H} and \hat{A} . This set, equipped with the operator composition as multiplication, forms an algebra. Crucially, operators within the commutant algebra represent conserved quantities due to their commutation relation with the Hamiltonian, and their simultaneous eigenstates define states that are invariant under the transformations generated by those operators, thus formally characterizing the system’s symmetries. The structure of this algebra directly reflects the nature and extent of the symmetries present in the system.

The commutant subspace is constructed by identifying all operators that commute with the system’s Hamiltonian \hat{H} . Specifically, an operator \hat{A} belongs to the commutant if [\hat{H}, \hat{A}] = \hat{H}\hat{A} - \hat{A}\hat{H} = 0 . This commutation relation implies that \hat{A} does not alter the time evolution of any state governed by \hat{H} , meaning states can be simultaneously eigenstates of both \hat{H} and \hat{A} . Consequently, the subspace spanned by the common eigenvectors of these commuting operators represents a symmetry of the system, as transformations represented by \hat{A} leave the physical state unchanged.

Traditionally, symmetry in a physical system is identified through observation of invariance under specific transformations. However, the commutant algebra provides a method for defining symmetry mathematically. This is achieved by constructing an algebra of operators that commute with the Hamiltonian \hat{H} of the system; these commuting operators represent conserved quantities, and their associated algebra formally encapsulates the system’s symmetries. This formal definition differs from mere observation by providing a rigorous framework to predict and analyze symmetry properties, independent of specific solutions or approximations to the system’s dynamics. Consequently, the commutant algebra moves beyond identifying what is symmetric to establishing a complete set of rules governing the system’s symmetric behavior.

Introducing the perturbation <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">V=S^x_4</span> breaks the U(1) symmetry, limiting system size but confirming that the system consistently satisfies the Diagonal Entanglement Theorem across the spectrum without anomalous low-entanglement eigenstates.
Introducing the perturbation V=S^x_4 breaks the U(1) symmetry, limiting system size but confirming that the system consistently satisfies the Diagonal Entanglement Theorem across the spectrum without anomalous low-entanglement eigenstates.

Engineering Stability: Constructing Hamiltonians with Protected States

The Commutant Hamiltonian approach to quantum system design leverages the mathematical properties of operator commutators to explicitly construct Hamiltonians possessing guaranteed scar subspaces. This method begins by defining a set of mutually non-commuting, local operators – the ‘scar operators’ – which define the desired scar subspace. The Hamiltonian is then constructed as a linear combination of these scar operators and their commutators, ensuring that the chosen subspace remains invariant under time evolution governed by the Hamiltonian. Specifically, the Hamiltonian H is built such that [H, O] = 0 for all operators O defining the scar subspace, thereby guaranteeing the existence of stationary states within that subspace and preventing thermalization. This contrasts with generic random matrices where such protected subspaces are statistically unlikely.

The construction of scarred Hamiltonians utilizes a ‘Bond Algebra’ to define the system’s interactions. This algebra consists of operators acting on local degrees of freedom, representing interactions between neighboring sites or particles within the quantum system. Specifically, these operators are chosen to satisfy certain algebraic relations, ensuring the resulting Hamiltonian possesses a set of protected, non-thermal eigenstates – the scar subspaces. The Bond Algebra’s structure dictates the range and type of interactions, directly influencing the properties of these scar states and the overall dynamics of the engineered quantum system. These local interactions, described by the Bond Algebra, are crucial for creating controlled, non-equilibrium behavior in the system.

The Commutant Hamiltonian approach, leveraging Bond Algebras to define local interactions, offers a systematic method for designing quantum systems exhibiting controlled non-thermal behavior. Specifically, by constructing the Hamiltonian from operators within the Bond Algebra, researchers can engineer systems with guaranteed, protected scar subspaces – eigenstates that remain largely unaffected by local perturbations. These scarred states prevent full thermalization, leading to observable deviations from expected thermal behavior and providing a platform for studying many-body quantum dynamics beyond the standard eigenstate thermalization hypothesis. This control over non-thermal behavior is crucial for applications in quantum simulation and the development of robust quantum technologies, allowing for the preservation of quantum information and the observation of novel quantum phenomena.

The diagonal ETH and bipartite entanglement entropy spectrum reveal a single scar state-indicated by an outlier (<span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">	imes</span>) near the center of the energy spectrum-that remains stable even with the inclusion of long-range interactions.
The diagonal ETH and bipartite entanglement entropy spectrum reveal a single scar state-indicated by an outlier ( imes) near the center of the energy spectrum-that remains stable even with the inclusion of long-range interactions.

A Hidden Order: Unifying Scars with the Z2 x Z2 Symmetry

The behavior of many-body quantum systems exhibiting scarred eigenstates can be surprisingly well-described by the abstract mathematical structure of the Z_2 \times Z_2 symmetry group. This group doesn’t represent a spatial symmetry, but rather a combination of two distinct, fundamental properties: sublattice symmetry, where the system possesses distinct sublattices that influence particle behavior, and tower flipping, a process involving the exchange of particles between different energy levels within a specific tower of states. The Z_2 \times Z_2 group elegantly encapsulates how these two seemingly separate features intertwine – each Z_2 component corresponds to one of these properties, and their combination dictates the allowed transformations that leave the system’s Hamiltonian unchanged. Consequently, understanding this symmetry is crucial for predicting and interpreting the characteristics of these non-ergodic states, as it governs the constraints on how quantum information can be distributed and manipulated within the system.

The structure of the commutant algebra, arising from Z_2 \times Z_2 symmetry, fundamentally underpins the stability of scarred eigenstates. This algebra defines the set of operators that commute with the system’s Hamiltonian, and its specific form-dictated by the symmetry-effectively protects the scar states from being easily disrupted by perturbations. Because the commutant algebra constrains how states can mix under these perturbations, the scar states retain their non-ergodic character, remaining localized and exhibiting distinct dynamical properties. This robustness isn’t merely a consequence of the symmetry itself, but a direct result of how that symmetry shapes the algebraic relationships between the Hamiltonian and the operators that act on the system, providing a powerful mechanism for preserving these exceptional states even in noisy environments.

The emergence of scarred eigenstates in quantum many-body systems, previously understood through individual models, finds a surprising degree of unification through the lens of Z_2 \times Z_2 symmetry. This discrete symmetry group doesn’t merely describe the presence of sublattice symmetry and tower flipping, but acts as a predictive tool for characterizing these unusual states. Specifically, calculations consistently reveal a value of -1 for the Lieb-Schultz-Mattis (LSM) Twist Operator when applied to scarred eigenstates across diverse physical platforms. This consistent result indicates that these states fundamentally break a certain symmetry, and the Z_2 \times Z_2 framework provides the necessary structure to understand and anticipate this behavior, suggesting a deeper, underlying principle governing the formation and properties of quantum scars.

The expectation value of the twist operator <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">U(0)U(0)</span> reveals exact scars in the unperturbed spectrum, but these scars are broken by a perturbation of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\epsilon V = 0.1\sum_{i}S^{x}_{i}</span>, as indicated by a deviation from the value of -1.
The expectation value of the twist operator U(0)U(0) reveals exact scars in the unperturbed spectrum, but these scars are broken by a perturbation of \epsilon V = 0.1\sum_{i}S^{x}_{i}, as indicated by a deviation from the value of -1.

The pursuit of these ‘quantum scars’ feels predictably circular. Researchers chase exotic states, demonstrating symmetry protection-a sort of theoretical bubble wrap-only to find it’s detectable via increasingly complex operators like this ‘Lieb-Schultz-Mattis twist’. It’s elegant, certainly, but one suspects production will reveal some mundane decoherence mechanism rendering it all…imperfect. As Jürgen Habermas observed, “The project of modernity has not failed, but it has been extended.” Similarly, this search for robust quantum states isn’t a failure if it reveals how fragile they truly are, especially given the super-extensive scaling of Quantum Fisher Information-a neat metric, if it survives contact with reality. Everything new is old again, just renamed and still broken.

What’s Next?

The identification of symmetry-protected topological character within quantum many-body scars is, predictably, not the end. It is, rather, a beautifully intricate complication. The super-extensive scaling of the Quantum Fisher Information offers a tantalizing glimpse of metrological potential, but practical extraction of this advantage will almost certainly require wrestling with decoherence and imperfections-the usual suspects. Every abstraction dies in production, and this one will likely succumb to the realities of noisy quantum hardware.

Future work will inevitably focus on extending this framework beyond the specific models considered. The challenge, however, lies not simply in demonstrating the existence of these symmetries in other systems, but in developing robust indicators – operators, perhaps – that remain reliable even in the face of perturbations. The current reliance on the Lieb-Schultz-Mattis twist operator, while elegant, feels… fragile.

One suspects that the true utility of this research will not be in building fault-tolerant quantum computers, but in providing a novel lens through which to understand the emergence of many-body phenomena. The scars, after all, are not merely a quirk of non-equilibrium dynamics; they represent a fundamental organization of quantum Hilbert space. And, as always, the most interesting discoveries are rarely those that solve problems, but those that reveal deeper, more perplexing ones.


Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.22397.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-02-27 11:05