Red Dead Redemption 3 Has a Tough Decision to Make

by

As a devoted fan, I can’t help but eagerly anticipate the continued masterpieces from Rockstar Games. While they’re fully engrossed in the creation of GTA 6, it’s not entirely out of the question that we might one day see the return of our favorite cowboy world in Red Dead Redemption 3. Given the IP’s immense popularity and prestige, a sequel seems like a plausible dream for many fans like myself.

The appearance of hypothetical “Red Dead Redemption 3” remains uncertain and intricate. The original “Red Dead Redemption” focused on John Marston’s struggle to correct past mistakes for the sake of his family’s future, while “Red Dead Redemption 2” served as a prequel, shedding light on events hinted at in the first game. This narrative structure effectively ties both games together, but it poses challenges when considering what direction “Red Dead Redemption 3” might take if ever produced. The question then arises whether this potential sequel should continue the story from where “Red Dead Redemption 1” left off or delve further into the past as a prequel. Each option has its merits, but there seems to be no definitive answer at present.

Rockstar has yet to confirm whether there will actually be a Red Dead Redemption 3.

Rockstar Will Have to Decide Whether Red Dead Redemption 3 Should Be a Prequel or Sequel

The Pros and Cons of RDR3 Being Another Prequel

A widely-discussed speculation among fans regarding potential game Red Dead Redemption 3, is that it may delve deeper into the history of the Van der Linde Gang, serving as another prequel. This setup could offer intriguing storytelling possibilities, allowing players to explore Dutch’s character prior to his spiral into insanity and paranoia. Additionally, it might provide further development for characters such as Arthur, Hosea, and John, enhancing our understanding of the world within the Red Dead Redemption series by shedding light on these key figures.

Exploring the backstory of the Gang may strip away a significant portion of its intrigue, charm, and personal interpretation. One of the most enticing factors about the Gang’s interaction in ‘Red Dead Redemption 2’ lies in the lingering idea of the “golden age,” seen through nostalgic lenses: was life truly better for the Gang, or were warnings apparent from the beginning? It is more impactful when players ponder such questions on their own instead of having everything explained to them. Moreover, with much of the future already set in stone, a new prequel might find it challenging to create genuine suspense.

The Pros and Cons of RDR3 Being a Sequel to RDR1

Instead of complex ideas, the game could potentially focus on Jack Marston’s story, continuing from where Red Dead Redemption 1’s epilogue ended. This would allow players to witness the gradual transformation of the Wild West into a more contemporary way of life. Moreover, the narrative could delve into Jack’s mourning and personal quest, portraying how he reconciles his outlaw past with aspirations for a brighter future.

Instead of revisiting the outlaw lifestyle in Red Dead Redemption 3, it could be intriguing to consider this concept. By the end of Red Dead Redemption, the traditional outlaw life is mostly a thing of the past; Rockstar may not have much more to add on this theme. However, if they were to create Red Dead Redemption 3 and focus on the organized crime world of the Roaring Twenties, it might stray too far from the Red Dead style and formula. If Rockstar truly wanted to create a classic, 1920s crime game, it would be wiser to separate it from the Red Dead franchise, thus avoiding any potential complications or constraints due to past games’ baggage.

Read More

2025-08-02 13:07