Secure AI Collaboration: Protecting Medical Data with Blockchain and Zero-Knowledge Proofs

Author: Denis Avetisyan


A new framework, zkFL-Health, is enabling privacy-preserving federated learning for medical AI, safeguarding sensitive data during collaborative model training.

The zkFL-Health architecture establishes a framework for confidential and verifiable federated learning, leveraging zero-knowledge proofs to ensure data privacy while enabling collaborative model training across distributed healthcare institutions.
The zkFL-Health architecture establishes a framework for confidential and verifiable federated learning, leveraging zero-knowledge proofs to ensure data privacy while enabling collaborative model training across distributed healthcare institutions.

zkFL-Health utilizes zero-knowledge proofs and blockchain technology to ensure data integrity, auditability, and verifiable AI in cross-silo medical applications.

Despite the growing need for large, diverse datasets to advance medical AI, strict privacy regulations and institutional constraints hinder data sharing. This paper introduces ‘zkFL-Health: Blockchain-Enabled Zero-Knowledge Federated Learning for Medical AI Privacy’, a novel framework that combines federated learning with zero-knowledge proofs and blockchain technology to enable verifiable, privacy-preserving collaborative training. By leveraging these techniques, zkFL-Health ensures data integrity, auditability, and removes reliance on a trusted central aggregator. Could this approach unlock the potential of multi-institutional medical AI while simultaneously addressing critical concerns around data security and regulatory compliance?


Data Silos: The Inevitable Catch in Healthcare AI

The promise of artificial intelligence in healthcare hinges on a complete understanding of individual patient histories, yet critical medical information frequently remains fragmented across disparate institutions and systems. This phenomenon, known as data siloing, restricts access to the holistic view necessary for accurate diagnoses and personalized treatment plans. While a patient’s record might include details from a primary care physician, specialist visits, hospital stays, and even wearable devices, these pieces are often stored in incompatible formats and governed by separate administrative controls. Consequently, AI algorithms designed to detect subtle patterns or predict health risks are starved of the comprehensive data needed to perform effectively, ultimately limiting their potential to improve patient outcomes and straining the advancement of precision medicine.

The pursuit of improved healthcare through machine learning frequently encounters a significant obstacle: the necessity of data sharing. Traditional centralized approaches to model training demand access to large, diverse datasets, yet increasingly stringent privacy regulations – such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – actively limit the transfer of sensitive patient information. Beyond legal constraints, practical concerns surrounding data security and the potential for breaches further complicate the process. Healthcare institutions understandably hesitate to expose confidential records, even in anonymized forms, creating a paradox where the very data needed to advance diagnostic and therapeutic AI remains locked within isolated systems, hindering progress and potentially impacting the quality of patient care.

The fragmentation of healthcare data significantly impedes the creation of truly effective artificial intelligence systems. Because AI model performance relies heavily on the breadth and diversity of training data, isolated datasets limit the ability of algorithms to learn nuanced patterns and generalize insights across patient populations. This results in models prone to bias, inaccuracy, and poor performance when applied to individuals outside the specific data source used for training. Consequently, the potential for AI to improve diagnostic accuracy, personalize treatment plans, and predict health risks remains largely unrealized, ultimately impacting the quality of patient care and hindering progress towards more proactive and preventative healthcare strategies.

Federated Learning: A Decentralized Illusion

Federated Learning (FL) enables machine learning model training on a distributed network of devices or servers holding local data samples, without requiring these samples to be centralized. This is achieved by transmitting model updates – such as gradient calculations – instead of the data itself. Each participating client trains the model locally on its dataset, and only the resulting model parameters or updates are shared with a central server for aggregation. The aggregated model is then redistributed to the clients, initiating another round of local training. This iterative process allows for collaborative model building while preserving data privacy, as raw data remains on the individual devices and is never exchanged.

Federated learning enhances data privacy and security by eliminating the need to centralize sensitive data for model training. Traditional machine learning often requires collecting data in a single location, which introduces substantial privacy risks and potential regulatory compliance issues, particularly within the healthcare sector where patient data is governed by regulations like HIPAA and GDPR. By training algorithms locally on distributed devices – such as hospital servers or individual patient wearables – and only sharing model updates rather than raw data, federated learning minimizes these risks. This decentralized approach addresses key concerns of healthcare providers and regulators regarding data breaches, unauthorized access, and the maintenance of patient confidentiality, while still enabling the development of robust and accurate AI models.

Standard Federated Learning (FL) systems, while preserving data privacy, are vulnerable to various attacks due to the absence of built-in integrity checks on model updates. Clients participating in FL training can intentionally submit malicious updates – known as poisoning attacks – designed to degrade global model performance or introduce backdoors. Furthermore, compromised clients, due to malware or security breaches, can inadvertently transmit corrupted updates, impacting model accuracy and reliability. Current FL protocols typically aggregate updates without verifying their validity, meaning a single malicious or compromised client can disproportionately influence the global model. This lack of verification mechanisms necessitates the development of robust defenses, such as secure aggregation techniques and anomaly detection algorithms, to ensure the trustworthiness of FL systems.

zkFL-Health: A Glimmer of Sanity in a Chaotic System

zkFL-Health establishes a cross-silo federated learning framework that integrates Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) and Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) to facilitate collaborative model training without direct data sharing. This architecture allows multiple institutions, each possessing a local dataset, to jointly train a global model while preserving data privacy. The framework utilizes ZKPs – specifically implementations like Halo2 and Nova – to cryptographically verify the correctness of model updates contributed by each participant. Computationally intensive tasks, and the generation of these proofs, are performed within TEEs, creating a secure enclave that protects against both internal and external threats. This combined approach ensures the validity of the trained model and prevents unauthorized access to sensitive data during the federated learning process.

Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) enable verification of the validity of model updates submitted by participants in a federated learning system without requiring access to the training data or the model parameters themselves. Implementations like Halo2 and Nova construct these proofs by demonstrating that a computation was performed correctly, effectively proving knowledge of a solution without revealing the solution itself. This is achieved through cryptographic techniques that allow a prover to convince a verifier of the truth of a statement without transmitting any information beyond the validity of the statement. Specifically, in the context of federated learning, a participant can prove that their model update was generated from their local data and adheres to the agreed-upon protocol, without exposing the sensitive patient information used to train the model or the specific weights of the update.

Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) are dedicated areas within a processor that provide a high level of security for sensitive computations. These enclaves operate independently from the main operating system and other software, creating an isolated execution environment resistant to software-based attacks, including those originating from compromised operating systems or hypervisors. Specifically, TEEs employ hardware-based memory encryption and integrity protection to safeguard data and code during processing. This isolation is critical for protecting model updates and sensitive healthcare data from unauthorized access or modification, mitigating the risk of data breaches and malicious interference during the federated learning process. Modern TEE implementations, such as Intel SGX and AMD SEV, also include attestation mechanisms to verify the integrity and authenticity of the enclave itself.

zkFL-Health utilizes a combined approach of Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) and Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) to establish a verifiable and privacy-preserving federated learning system for sensitive healthcare data. ZKPs enable validation of model updates without disclosing the underlying data or model parameters, while TEEs provide a secure computational environment, mitigating risks of malicious attacks and data breaches. Performance evaluation on the CheXpert dataset demonstrates near-perfect diagnostic accuracy, achieving an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.864, indicating the framework’s efficacy in maintaining both data privacy and model performance during collaborative AI training.

The Long View: Collaborative AI and the Illusion of Progress

zkFL-Health establishes a novel framework for healthcare institutions to collaboratively develop artificial intelligence models without compromising patient data privacy. By leveraging zero-knowledge federated learning, the system allows multiple organizations to train a shared AI model on their local datasets, exchanging only encrypted parameters and cryptographic proofs rather than raw patient information. This approach circumvents the traditional barriers to data sharing – namely, legal restrictions and concerns about confidentiality – thereby unlocking access to larger, more diverse datasets. The resulting models benefit from increased statistical power and generalizability, leading to improvements in accuracy and robustness across a range of clinical applications, including more precise diagnoses and personalized treatment plans. Ultimately, zkFL-Health accelerates the pace of AI innovation in healthcare while upholding the highest standards of data security and patient privacy.

The potential of this collaborative framework extends far beyond a single application, promising to reshape multiple facets of healthcare delivery. Disease diagnosis stands to benefit from more comprehensive and accurate models trained on larger, more diverse datasets, leading to earlier and more effective interventions. Treatment planning can be refined through the analysis of collective patient data, identifying optimal strategies tailored to individual needs and characteristics. Perhaps most significantly, the framework facilitates the advancement of personalized medicine, enabling the development of predictive models that anticipate individual responses to treatments and proactively adjust care plans. By breaking down data silos while preserving patient privacy, this technology empowers clinicians with the insights needed to deliver truly individualized and proactive healthcare, ultimately improving patient outcomes across a spectrum of conditions and care settings.

The true potential of collaborative healthcare AI is increasingly realized through the seamless integration of frameworks like zkFL-Health with established data repositories. Historically, sensitive patient data contained within resources such as MIMIC-III and CheXpert remained largely siloed, hindering comprehensive analysis and model development due to privacy concerns and logistical challenges. zkFL-Health circumvents these limitations, enabling secure access and collaborative learning without direct data sharing. This integration unlocks a wealth of previously inaccessible information, fostering the creation of more robust and generalizable AI models capable of improving disease diagnosis, treatment strategies, and ultimately, personalized patient care. By leveraging existing infrastructure, zkFL-Health dramatically accelerates the path from data collection to impactful clinical applications, promising a future where collaborative AI significantly enhances healthcare outcomes.

The zkFL-Health framework demonstrates a compelling balance between data privacy and analytical performance. Evaluations on the CheXpert dataset reveal diagnostic accuracy – measured by an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.864 – that is virtually indistinguishable from standard Federated Learning approaches achieving 0.865. Crucially, this performance is maintained with negligible accuracy loss despite the enhanced security measures. Beyond accuracy, the system exhibits impressive scalability, processing over 850 transactions per second while simultaneously providing cryptographic proof of data integrity. Utilizing GPU acceleration with an A100 processor, proof generation remains remarkably efficient, completing in under two minutes, paving the way for real-time collaborative AI applications in healthcare.

The pursuit of verifiable AI, as demonstrated by zkFL-Health, feels predictably… cyclical. This framework, layering zero-knowledge proofs and blockchain onto federated learning, attempts to solve the inevitable: distrust. It’s a complex solution to a simple problem – someone, somewhere, will always try to game the system. As Tim Bern-Lee observed, “The Web is more a social creation than a technical one.” This rings true; the technical elegance of zkFL-Health is only as strong as the social contract surrounding its implementation. One anticipates the first exploit will arrive before the documentation is fully updated, proving, once again, that production is the ultimate, unforgiving QA environment. It’s a new coat of paint on an old problem – securing data – and it will eventually crack.

What Breaks Next?

zkFL-Health, like all attempts at elegant systems, merely postpones the inevitable entropy. The framework addresses data integrity and privacy – laudable goals, certainly – but presumes a static threat model. Any sufficiently motivated adversary will not be concerned with verifying computations; they’ll target the weakest link in the hardware supply chain, or simply bribe an administrator. Anything self-healing just hasn’t broken yet. The current emphasis on cryptographic proofs feels strangely optimistic, given the historical rate at which ‘secure’ algorithms succumb to side-channel attacks.

The pursuit of verifiable AI is, at its core, a documentation problem. And documentation is collective self-delusion. The system’s complexity-combining federated learning, zero-knowledge proofs, and blockchain-introduces layers of potential failure that will be exquisitely difficult to debug in a production environment. If a bug is reproducible, it implies a stable system; the absence of reported bugs suggests a lack of deployment, not a robust solution.

Future work will undoubtedly focus on optimizing the computational overhead of these proofs, or perhaps exploring different consensus mechanisms. But a more pressing concern should be the development of robust monitoring tools – not to prevent failures, but to detect them quickly and contain the damage. Because when, not if, something goes wrong, the blockchain will faithfully record the disaster for posterity.


Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.21048.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2025-12-27 15:43