FTX Estate Faces Competing Claims For SBF’s Forfeited Assets

As an analyst with extensive experience in the crypto industry and legal proceedings, I find this situation intriguing. The ongoing battle for SBF’s forfeited assets in the FTX case is far from over, as three distinct parties – the FTX Debtors Estate, Emergent Fidelity Technologies, and a group of FTX creditors – have filed claims.


In an intriguing turn of events, the FTX Debtors’ Estate is presently engaged in disputes with certain entities regarding ownership of assets seized from Sam Bankman-Fred (SBF) following his criminal conviction for fraud and money laundering at FTX. The debtors’ estate has filed a petition in the US District Court Southern District of New York on Friday to initiate ancillary proceedings and tackle these claims.

FTX: Three-Way Battle Emerges For SBF’s Forfeited Assets

The FTX Debtors Estate has applied for the right to seize assets belonging to Sam Bankman-Fried, which can be categorized into six groups. These include funds from interlocutory sales of Robinhood shares, held in Emergent Fidelity Technologies’ account; funds in FTX Digital Markets’ accounts at Farmington State Bank and Silvergate Bank; funds in Binance accounts under Alameda Research Ltd. and Evergreen North Enterprises; two aircraft; a Signature Bank account shared by Bankman-Fried and former FTX executive Luk Wai Chan; and political contributions, as well as other donations made by Bankman-Fried and former FTX employees that can be linked to fraudulent or money laundering activities.

Based on the filed petition, the FTX Debtor’s Estate asserts that it has priority access to these particular assets over Sam Bankman-Fried. The reason being is that these assets are either owned by the company or were financed using the company’s resources.

Despite being the major shareholder of Emergent, Bankman-Fried didn’t personally buy the Robinhood stocks at issue. Instead, these shares were acquired in Emergent’s name. Therefore, according to their application, Emergent has the right to claim the proceeds from those shares.

Simultaneously, a class action lawsuit brought forth by FTX creditors asserts that seized assets, which they claim originate from or relate to customer funds, must be restored to those customers instead of being included in the FTX debtors’ estate.

This group of creditors intends to propose an alternative settlement method, returning equivalent assets instead of cash as previously suggested by the bankruptcy estate. Additionally, the class action lawsuit raises concerns over the debtors’ estate prioritizing payments to non-customer creditors like BlockFi, using funds supposedly belonging to FTX customers, before addressing claims from regular creditors.

After examining the petitions, the court will arrange separate hearing sessions for both parties to settle their disputes regarding the seized assets. Once these hearings are concluded, the appropriate agencies will be informed to facilitate a just and equitable division of the assets.

Crypto Market Overview

Recently, the overall value of the cryptocurrency market has decreased by 3.2%, amounting to a current worth of approximately $2.3 trillion.

FTX Estate Faces Competing Claims For SBF’s Forfeited Assets

Read More

2024-06-16 13:11