Ex-SEC Reveals New SEC Leadership Impact On Ripple Case, Crypto Lawsuits

by

As a seasoned researcher with extensive experience in securities law and regulatory compliance, I find Marc Fagel’s insights into the potential impact of new SEC leadership on ongoing crypto cases, particularly the Ripple case, quite intriguing.

Marc Fagel, a lawyer with experience at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has shared insights on how changes within the SEC’s leadership might affect ongoing cryptocurrency lawsuits, such as the high-profile Ripple case. His remarks were made in response to questions about the potential influence of current enforcement actions by political climate or recent scandals.

How Will New SEC Leadership Impact Ripple Case?

Jungle Inc, a well-known figure in the crypto community, posed a question: If a president favorable to cryptocurrencies is elected, will the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) undergo a shift in approach towards digital assets? A legal expert responded by sharing that historically, new SEC administrations tend to avoid interfering with ongoing enforcement actions. As an example, a leadership change would not typically influence the progression of cases such as Ripple or other ongoing lawsuits.

Despite Fagel’s observation that a new administration could shift focus on upcoming cases, he maintained that the actual enforcement actions themselves remain non-political.

Enforcing laws is typically non-partisan; a breach of the law remains a breach regardless of political affiliations. The majority of enforcement suggestions are generally agreed upon. However, when it comes to cryptocurrencies, a change in administration might lead to differing perspectives.

As a crypto investor, I’d interpret Fagel’s observation this way: The outcome of the Ripple case could be significantly influenced by any new policies or priorities set by the administration. In other words, if we see a pro-crypto administration take over, the settlement process for the Ripple case might proceed more smoothly. Additionally, should the SEC rule in favor of Ripple, they may decide against appealing the decision, which could lead to a quicker resolution for all parties involved.

Additionally, lawsuits against Binance, Coinbase, Consensys, and other crypto companies by the SEC may follow a similar outcome. Yet, the specifics would hinge on the court’s decisions. In instances where misconduct is substantiated, even a pro-crypto administration would be compelled to take action.

Expected Changes In Crypto Regulation

Under the current Chairmanship of Gary Gensler, the SEC has become more assertive, evident in its heightened crackdown on the crypto sector. A departure from the prior administration led by Jay Clayton, who primarily targeted blatant infringements such as Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs).

As a researcher looking into the SEC’s regulatory actions towards crypto, I’ve found that Commissioner Hester Pierce mentioned the lack of extensive dialogue on crypto enforcement during a particular meeting. However, Fagel, another commissioner, linked the intensified focus to notable fraud cases such as those involving FTX, Celsius, and Terra Luna. Consequently, he rejected the idea that the SEC’s increased scrutiny was solely driven by political figures like Senator Elizabeth Warren.

Fagel admitted that despite enforcement typically being non-partisan, a new Securities and Exchange Commission leadership might shape future policies regarding stricter regulations in response to significant financial losses caused by scandals.

Despite his warning that adopting a less confrontational position towards cryptocurrencies could have consequences if another significant scandal arises, the SEC might be compelled to increase their regulatory efforts once more. As Fagel put it, “If they opt for a lighter touch on crypto, one more FTX or Celsius-like incident could lead them to tighten the reins again.”

Read More

2024-07-29 12:02