As a seasoned researcher with a keen interest in blockchain technology and its regulatory landscape, I find myself intrigued by this latest development in the SEC’s case against Tron and Justin Sun. The court’s decision to deny the SEC’s request for expedited proceedings is a significant blow to the agency, and it seems that the defendants are mounting a formidable defense.
A federal judge in New York has denied the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) request to speed up the legal process in their ongoing securities fraud case against the Tron Foundation and its leader, Justin Sun. This court ruling represents a setback for the SEC as they aimed to resolve procedural disagreements before any potential trial.
Tron Wins Round As Judge Denies SEC Request
The SEC had filed a motion requesting a pre-trial conference and permission to submit additional responses in its lawsuit against the Tron Foundation, Justin Sun, the BitTorrent Foundation, and Rainberry Inc.
As a researcher delving into the intricacies of U.S. securities law, I found myself grappling with the defendants’ innovative interpretations of the ‘common enterprise’ aspect in the Howey Test. This test is instrumental in distinguishing investment contracts under these laws.
The SEC pointed out that the defense brought up this particular argument following their request to discard the case, which goes against typical legal practices. They aimed either to disregard the argument altogether or, as an alternate option, to be granted approval for submitting a supplementary response concerning the issue.
Nevertheless, the court declined the regulatory body’s request because the defense had not contested the ‘shared venture’ aspect that is part of the Howey Test’s criteria.
Defense Counters Accusations
Tron and Justin Sun’s legal team countered the accusations, suggesting that the regulatory body had artificially created a conflict over an issue that didn’t truly exist. They asserted that their primary defense strategy revolved around the third aspect of the Howey Test, which pertains to investing money with the hope of earning profits from other people’s efforts.
Additionally, the company’s lawyers argued against the agency’s request for additional documentation, asserting that this action would merely add complexity to the ongoing case.
They additionally emphasized that their case for the third aspect of the Howey Test was strong and that the SEC had misunderstood or misrepresented their position.
Justin Sun Jurisdiction Challenge
As a result, the defense attorneys have pointed out using the Howey Test that the regulatory body does not hold authority over this particular case. They made this claim in March, asserting that the majority of transactions involving TRX and BTT tokens took place outside the U.S., with the primary market being foreign investors.
In simpler terms, Tron contends that the regulatory body is overstepping its limits by attempting to enforce U.S. securities regulations on deals that took place in different countries.
In April, the SEC argued that Justin Sun frequently visited the U.S. during the relevant timeframe, implying U.S. jurisdiction over the case. The SEC contends these trips were for business matters involving Tron and its affiliated companies.
Read More
- ENA PREDICTION. ENA cryptocurrency
- SOL PREDICTION. SOL cryptocurrency
- USD PHP PREDICTION
- BTC PREDICTION. BTC cryptocurrency
- LUNC PREDICTION. LUNC cryptocurrency
- USD ZAR PREDICTION
- USD COP PREDICTION
- WIF PREDICTION. WIF cryptocurrency
- SGB PREDICTION. SGB cryptocurrency
- USD VES PREDICTION
2024-08-20 03:32