Concord is Being Review Bombed

by

Concord is Being Review Bombed

Key Takeaways

  • Concord is struggling with low player counts.
  • The game has also been targeted by reviewer bombers and has a 2.2 user rating on Metacritic.
  • The negative reviews accuse the game of being “leftist propaganda.”

As a seasoned gamer with over two decades under my belt, I’ve seen games rise and fall, thrive and struggle. But Concord, dear friend, is a peculiar case indeed. With its lackluster launch on Steam and the subsequent review bombing on Metacritic, it seems the game has been caught in a storm of controversy that’s drowning its potential.

The recently launched live-service FPS titled “Concord” from PlayStation, which has had difficulty garnering a substantial audience due to its poor reception, is currently receiving negative reviews on Metacritic in a practice known as “review bombing.” Since its initial announcement a few months ago, “Concord” has faced criticism for being a hero shooter and for the unusual designs of its characters.

As a gamer diving into the world of Concord, I can’t help but feel disheartened by the lukewarm reception this game seems to have received. The initial launch on Steam was underwhelming, with a peak of just 697 players during its debut weekend – a number that pales in comparison to what I’d expect from a game as promising as this one. At the moment, there are approximately 152 gamers still playing Concord on Steam, which is a far cry from the bustling virtual worlds I usually explore.

The video game “Concord” has received poor ratings on Metacritic, with scores of 0/10 and 1/10, causing its user rating to dip to a disappointing 2.2 at the moment. This places “Concord” among the games on Metacritic with some of the lowest ratings in terms of user reviews. While it’s possible that there are people who genuinely dislike “Concord,” it appears that many critics may be attacking the game not based on its gameplay, but due to allegations of “leftist propaganda” and a focus on diversity, equality, and inclusion (DEI). Some individuals giving “Concord” extremely low scores might have played the game, but it’s likely that many haven’t and are criticizing the game for elements like the use of pronouns for its characters.

Concord Has a 2.2 Rating on Metacritic

As a gamer, I’ve delved into comparing the feedback for a game called Concord across two different platforms – Metacritic and Steam. Now, not many gamers have tried out Concord on Steam, but those who did seem to enjoy it. On Steam, the game has garnered a Mostly Positive rating, which is quite the opposite of its dismal user rating on Metacritic. It’s fascinating how opinions can vary so greatly!

In my assessment of the game called Concord, I commended it for its fundamental gameplay mechanics. The blend of diverse abilities and traditional arena shooter elements results in an enjoyable experience. Moreover, it performs smoothly, and the graphics are stunningly beautiful. However, I found the character designs rather subpar and uninviting. I also expressed concern about Concord’s monetization model, which, coupled with its unattractive character designs, may be the primary factors preventing it from gaining popularity.

As a gamer, I’ve noticed that most of Concord’s rivals in the hero shooter genre are free to play. However, unlike them, Concord is a premium title priced at $40. Right now, it’s great that there aren’t any microtransactions, but with the competitive landscape, it seems like the game might need to transition to a free-to-play model to stay afloat.

Read More

2024-08-27 19:53