Binance CEO Denies Allegations Of Mass Freezing Palestinian Crypto Assets

As a seasoned analyst with years of experience navigating the complex landscape of cryptocurrency and geopolitics, I find myself deeply concerned about the recent allegations against Binance regarding the alleged mass freezing of Palestinian funds. The accusation, if true, not only raises serious ethical questions but also poses a significant risk to the trust that users place in centralized exchanges like Binance.


The cryptocurrency exchange, Binance, has attracted attention following online allegations that it froze the digital assets of all wallets associated with Palestine.

The announcement sparked worries within the user base and cryptocurrency community, as they voiced criticism over the reported action. Facing the criticism, the exchange’s chief executive, Richard Teng, has refuted the accusations, stating that the story lacks factual basis.

Binance Accused Of Mass Freezing Palestinian Funds

This week, there have been claims online suggesting Binance, the world’s largest trading platform by volume, froze the assets of its Palestinian users. Ray Youssef, CEO of Noone and co-founder of Paxful, made these allegations, stating that Binance has confiscated funds belonging to all Palestinians, following a demand from the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).

The CEO stated that the details originated from multiple different places. Furthermore, he asserted that every request for the return of the money has been turned down. In his view, Binance’s behavior hints at potential consequences for users in Syria and Lebanon.

Binance CEO Denies Allegations Of Mass Freezing Palestinian Crypto Assets

Additionally, he disclosed what appeared to be a document submitted by Binance as their response to requests. The letter, bearing the signature of Paul Landes, head of the National Bureau for Counter Terror Financing (NBCTF), grants Israel’s Minister of Defense the authority to impose a “temporary asset freeze” on a designated terrorist group. This includes cryptocurrencies among other assets.

Under the anti-terrorism law, digital currencies transferred by a designated terrorist group are considered assets belonging to that group. Any digital wallet receiving such funds is deemed an asset directly involved in committing a severe terrorist offense of aiding or supporting a terrorist organization. As specified in the Anti-Terrorism Act and related laws, the Minister of Defense has authorization to seize these assets administratively before they can be confiscated.

Additionally, Youssef disclosed that it appeared as though the exchange was encouraging Palestinians to reach out via an email associated with the Israeli government. In his words, “Israel is exerting enormous pressure on Binance and other platforms, aiming to freeze the assets of every Palestinian user.”

Richard Teng Addresses Controversial Measure

1. The cryptocurrency community swiftly responded to the announcement, voicing disapproval towards the exchange due to actions that violated the core values of blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Many users expressed dissatisfaction with centralized exchanges (CEXes), claiming they prioritize their own interests, and advised investors to protect their assets from such platforms.

Amid the backlash, Binance’s CEO addressed the situation. Teng denied the report, calling it FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt) as “only a limited number of user accounts, linked to illicit funds, were blocked from transacting.”

Binance CEO Denies Allegations Of Mass Freezing Palestinian Crypto Assets

The CEO firmly denied allegations of freezing funds for all Palestinian users, stressing that Binance adheres to standard international anti-money laundering laws, similar to any other financial entity. Moreover, CEO Teng expressed a desire for continued peace and stability in the region.

Regardless of what was said, numerous community members continue to express their worries over the actions taken by the exchange. Numerous Binance users have described the decision as “unacceptable,” fearing that the platform might take similar actions against other countries’ citizens in the future.

1. Some raised doubts about the method used to verify if the money was involved in illegal activities and the rejections of appeals. Ultimately, a few expressed mistrust towards the platform, stating they wished to remove their funds from it instead.

Binance CEO Denies Allegations Of Mass Freezing Palestinian Crypto Assets

Read More

2024-08-29 05:12