US Share In Successful Crypto Startups Slumps To 20% Under Democrats

by

As a seasoned crypto investor with over a decade of experience in this dynamic industry, I’ve seen the ebb and flow of regulatory environments across various jurisdictions. The recent developments in the US crypto startup arena have piqued my interest, given my personal investment portfolio heavily leans towards innovative Web3 projects.

The prominence of the United States in the international crypto startup sector has significantly decreased, as indicated by a recent report from Alliance, a community of crypto founders. Furthermore, Qiao Wang, one of the co-founders of Alliance, attributed this decline to Democratic rule, which he believes is responsible for a drop in the percentage of successful Web3 startups based in the U.S.

Overview Of Crypto Startups In The U.S.

In the latter part of 2022, the data shows a significant decrease from about 80% down to just 20%, and this trend has raised alarm among experts within the cryptocurrency industry regarding the potential future state of the sector in the United States. It appears that the drop in successful American startups is linked to escalating regulatory hurdles.

Alliance’s Wang implies that the present regulatory climate, particularly under Democratic administration, is growing less hospitable for newcomers. In essence, he cautioned, “If Democrats continue to mislead for another four years, there won’t be any promising cryptocurrency ventures remaining in the U.S.”

“One important reason for the decline is the increased examination by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Lately, the SEC has been ramping up its investigations into several cryptocurrency companies, even those considered big players such as OpenSea, Coinbase, and Uniswap.”

On August 28th, OpenSea was given a warning (Wells Notice) by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). CEO Devin Finzer revealed that the SEC is considering whether the digital collectibles traded on the platform should be classified as securities. This unexpected viewpoint has surprised the industry.

As a researcher delving into the dynamic world of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), I find myself taken aback by the assertive action taken by the SEC against creators and artists. The prominent platform, OpenSea, which holds significant influence in the NFT sphere, has vowed to contest the SEC’s stance, arguing that their products should not be classified as securities, instead representing unique digital assets.

Furthermore, it’s important to note that the SEC’s actions against [Company Name] aren’t unique. In fact, Uniswap, another significant decentralized platform, encountered a comparable situation when the regulator initiated an investigation into its business practices. Similarly, Coinbase and Binance have experienced similar scrutiny from the regulatory body.

Additionally, Finzer expressed concern that these regulatory measures might suppress innovation in various areas, adding to concerns within the U.S. cryptocurrency start-up industry. He emphasized that it would be unfortunate if creators ceased producing digital art due to potential regulatory threats.

Donald Trump’s Win To Change Tables?

From a wider perspective in political terms, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s firm approach might be seen as a discreet critique aimed at former President Donald Trump. A Republican contender has just introduced a fresh line of NFT collectibles, but if the SEC’s assertions prove accurate, Trump’s NFT project could encounter legal issues.

Ripple CLO Stuart Alderoty weighed in on the debate, highlighting a historical precedent:

“Fun fact: In 1976, the SEC ruled that art galleries, even when promoting and selling to buyers that had investment motives, didn’t need to register with the SEC.”

In this situation, the historical background significantly impacts the ongoing debate about regulations, as there’s a possibility that the SEC might not prevail in a lawsuit against OpenSea. Additionally, political climate plays a role in shaping the digital assets landscape, particularly within the U.S. crypto startup sector. If pro-crypto candidates like Trump win, potential crackdowns could be less severe, offering some respite for existing enforcement actions.

The proposed cryptocurrency policies of Vice President Kamala Harris have yet to yield noticeable outcomes, whereas the pro-cryptocurrency stance of former President Donald Trump has been steadily growing in popularity. Notably, Trump has pledged to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve and is linked with several crypto projects. One such project is a Decentralized Finance (DeFi) initiative that Donald Trump Jr. has hinted at.

In the Polymarket predictions, Trump has a 50% likelihood compared to Harris’s 48%, suggesting that political circumstances play a significant role in shaping future crypto regulations and advancements. Additionally, pro-Bitcoin figure Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who recently withdrew from the presidential race, has aligned himself with Trump. This move could potentially garner more support from cryptocurrency enthusiasts, making it tougher for Harris in the electoral contest.

Read More

2024-08-31 00:10