As a seasoned crypto investor with over a decade of experience navigating the ever-evolving digital asset landscape, I find myself increasingly concerned about the seemingly relentless regulatory crackdown on our industry by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). While I understand the need for regulation to ensure consumer protection, the aggressive stance taken by the SEC against prominent players in the crypto sphere raises red flags.
As a researcher, I’m sharing my perspective on a recent development: Ripple‘s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, has taken issue with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). He claims that the SEC is attempting to influence legal matters concerning crypto companies in an unjustified manner. In a recent post on X, Mr. Alderoty emphasized that the term “crypto asset security” mentioned in an SEC filing lacks any solid legal grounding.
Ripple Challenges Regulator’s Take on FTX
The Commission has taken action against FTX, the Bahamas-based cryptocurrency exchange which collapsed in 2022 due to misuse of customer deposits. Now in bankruptcy, the exchange aims to return funds to creditors affected by its fall two years ago. Their plan involves repaying users approximately $16.3 billion through a new restructuring strategy that combines cash and stable digital currencies.
For context, stablecoins are crypto assets pegged 1:1 with a fiat currency, in this case, the US dollar. However, the US SEC is against this move as it insists that it maintains the right to “challenge transactions involving crypto assets.” The agency tried to question the legality of stablecoins under the present securities law. SEC noted that FTX’s portfolio includes “crypto asset security” which it now plans to monetize to repay creditors.
As a researcher, I found myself compelled to respond when the Commission’s categorization led me to address the issue regarding Ripple CLO. In my opinion, this particular term does not appear in any legislative text. Consequently, I posited that it is a term coined by the SEC, rather than an established legal term. Moreover, I cautioned the agency against its usage, suggesting that it could potentially mislead judges, as I believe it may be intentionally deceptive.
US SEC Crackdown on Crypto Firms
Three weeks have elapsed since Judge Analisa Torres issued a $125 million fine against Ripple in its ongoing lawsuit with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which is an important detail to highlight.
1. “FTX has become the latest target for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), following Ripple. The SEC’s increased scrutiny of cryptocurrency exchanges is a significant ongoing trend. In the past, platforms such as Robinhood, Kraken, ConsenSys, Uniswap, and Coinbase have found themselves under the SEC’s microscope.”
Last week, the non-fungible trading platform OpenSea received a warning letter (Wells Notice) from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), led by Gary Gensler. This action is part of a continuing effort to enforce regulations. The SEC has reason to believe that the digital collectibles traded on the OpenSea marketplace could be classified as securities, much like Uniswap received a similar warning from the regulator several months ago.
As an analyst, I am optimistic about the potential shift in the crypto regulatory landscape following the arrival of a new administration in November. The general expectation is that the current chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Gary Gensler, may be replaced. This change could bring about a more favorable regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies.
Read More
- ENA PREDICTION. ENA cryptocurrency
- SOL PREDICTION. SOL cryptocurrency
- USD PHP PREDICTION
- LUNC PREDICTION. LUNC cryptocurrency
- BTC PREDICTION. BTC cryptocurrency
- SHIB PREDICTION. SHIB cryptocurrency
- USD COP PREDICTION
- Red Dead Redemption: Undead Nightmare – Where To Find Sasquatch
- USD ZAR PREDICTION
- PNG PREDICTION. PNG cryptocurrency
2024-09-02 21:42