Coinbase CLO Debunks SEC ‘Crypto Asset Security’ Claims Before Gensler Hearing

by

As a seasoned crypto investor with over two decades of experience navigating the ever-evolving landscape of digital assets, I find myself deeply intrigued by the ongoing tussle between the SEC and the industry giants like Coinbase and Ripple. The terminology debate around “crypto asset security” has certainly sparked my curiosity, not only because of its implications for the broader crypto community but also due to its potential impact on regulatory clarity.

Paul Grewal, General Counsel at Coinbase, and Ripple‘s General Counsel have raised objections to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) using the term “cryptocurrency asset security.” This criticism arises as the SEC employs this term more frequently, yet there is no existing U.S. law that validates it. In essence, they argue that the SEC’s use of this term lacks legal basis.

There’s been a significant increase in focus on this matter, as the SEC Chair, Gary Gensler, along with the other four SEC Commissioners, are anticipated to testify at a hearing held by the House Financial Services Committee.

Coinbase CLO Questions SEC’s Use of “Crypto Asset Security” 

Grewal expressed his thoughts on X, stating that the term “cryptocurrency asset security” lacks uniformity and clarity within the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) enforcement actions. Additionally, the Chief Legal Officer of Coinbase pointed out that the SEC has shown inconsistency in classifying tokens as either securities or investment contracts depending on various legal scenarios.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has not consistently upheld its assertion that the broader investment contract transactions involve these particular tokens, as it often states. Instead, they have repeatedly contended in various instances that the tokens themselves are such transactions – a stance that directly contradicts their argument presented before a federal court.

— paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) September 19, 2024

These accusations emerge at a time when Representative Ritchie Torres, a member of Congress from New York, has previously voiced similar reservations during a congressional hearing and questioned the Securities and Exchange Commission’s choice of words.

The phrase ‘digital asset security’ or ‘cryptocurrency security’ is not mentioned in any existing laws, regulations, or court rulings. This lack of legal precedent has led to criticisms from blockchain advocates and lawmakers. Some legal experts, like Daniel Gallagher, the Chief Legal Officer at Robinhood, argue that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may have coined this term without any legislative basis.

Ripple’s Legal Officer Joins the Criticism

In a similar vein, Stuart Alderoty from Ripple echoed the sentiments of Coinbase’s legal officer, stating that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) appears to be exploiting the terminology employed in court proceedings. Alderoty pointed out that the SEC’s frequent use of “crypto asset security” in legal documents is drawing increasing criticism.

To give an example, the SEC has recently admitted that they used a confusing term in their lawsuit against Binance, explaining that their choice of words may have led to misunderstanding.

At present, Ripple finds itself embroiled in a legal dispute with the SEC concerning the classification of XRP. As per Alderoty’s stance, the SEC’s lack of consistency is undermining its credibility in court.

SEC Under Scrutiny Ahead of Congressional Testimony

In the coming week, all five members of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including Chair Gary Gensler, will appear before the House Financial Services Committee. This is the first time since 2019 that the entire commission will face Congress. The hearing takes place amidst growing criticisms from legislators and industry players who believe the SEC has been unfriendly towards blockchain technology.

Representatives Tom Emmer and Patrick McHenry have voiced some significant concerns about the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) approach to regulating crypto airdrops, which they view as vital for maintaining the decentralization of blockchain networks. They’ve gone so far as to accuse the agency of not addressing these issues effectively, suggesting that its regulatory model is ill-suited for the rapidly evolving digital asset industry.

In addition to Coinbase and Ripple facing potential legal issues with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Gary Gensler, the SEC chairman, is under investigation for accusations of illegal hiring practices within his company. This inquiry could make his forthcoming testimonies before the House Financial Services Committee more complex, as he may be asked not only about the SEC’s position on digital assets but also about the agency’s internal administration.

Read More

2024-09-20 02:28