No! Judge Rejects Former Celsius CEO’s Attempt To Dismiss Fraud Charges

by

As a seasoned analyst with extensive experience navigating the complex world of finance and cryptocurrencies, I find myself following this legal battle between Alex Mashinsky and the US government with great interest. The denial of his motion to dismiss charges against him is not surprising, given the increasing scrutiny on the digital currency industry by regulatory bodies worldwide.

As a crypto investor, I’ve been closely following the developments with the Celsius Network case, and I was disheartened to learn that a former executive of this defunct cryptocurrency firm had his motion to dismiss the charges against him denied by a US federal court. It seems he will need to continue to confront these legal challenges in the days ahead.

While this dispute between a past cryptocurrency executive may appear as a simple legal conflict at first glance, its broader implications reveal a larger tale – that of government oversight and scrutiny over the digital currency sector.

Motion Denied

In court proceedings, Judge presiding over the case rejected the request by Alex Mashinsky, former CEO of Celsius Network, to dismiss two accusations of criminal activity. The allegations involve the alleged manipulation of cryptocurrency prices and fraudulent actions against him.

Judge Rejects Ex-Celsius CEO’s Attempt to Drop Fraud Charges

In a new development concerning the ongoing story of Celsius: A federal judge has denied a request made by Alex Mashinsky, the previous CEO of Celsius Network, to drop crucial accusations against him.

Mashinsky, who faces seven charges, tried to argue that two of…

— IBC Group Official (@ibcgroupio) November 11, 2024

The US District Court for the Southern District of New York, under Judge John Koeltl, declined Alexander Mashinsky’s request to dismiss the two charges against him. This means Mashinsky must proceed to address the seven accusations related to his involvement with Celsius, which will be heard in court in January 2025. This decision increases the likelihood that Mashinsky will need to defend himself during the upcoming trial.

In simpler terms, Judge Koeltl determined that the cryptocurrency executive’s reasons for dismissing the cases were either no longer relevant (moot) or lacked validity (without merit).

Mashinsky’s Argument

Mashinsky’s legal team contends that it is inappropriate to accuse their client of breaching both the Commodity Exchange Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as they believe the court is essentially bringing two separate charges based on a single instance of alleged misconduct.

On the contrary, Koeltl expressed his dissent towards their stance, stating that a finding of guilt for breaching the Securities Exchange Act does not automatically imply Mahinsky’s innocence regarding the violation of the Commodity Exchange Act.

Mahinsky further contended that the charges against him regarding commodities lacked legal validity, as the state prosecutors did not adequately demonstrate that Bitcoin deposits made by platform investors were for a weekly rewards program. The federal judge agreed, stating that this matter is a question of fact that cannot be decisively answered at this stage of the trial.

Koeltl also denied Mashinsky’s motion to dismiss market manipulation charges, saying it is “meritless”. The judge added that the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has already ruled before that “open-market transactions that are not inherently manipulative may constitute manipulative activity when accompanied by manipulative intent.”

Celsius: Legal Woes

Previously, Celsius was a significant player in the cryptocurrency sector. Regrettably, the company encountered financial difficulties and ceased operations in 2022 due to the halt of customer withdrawal requests. Additionally, they filed for bankruptcy due to a substantial imbalance on their financial statements.

Consequently, the SEC accused Mashinsky of committing fraud and tampering with the market, leading to the downfall of his cryptocurrency company.

According to officials, the CEO of the cryptocurrency company misled investors by stating that their coin (CEL) was more secure than it actually was.

Should Mashinsky be found guilty on all counts, he faces a potential prison term of up to 115 years. However, it’s important to note that he has not yet entered a plea for these allegations.

Read More

2024-11-13 06:42