Former US Treasury Secretary Calls Trump’s National Bitcoin Reserve Proposal ‘Crazy’

by

As a seasoned economist with decades of experience in government and finance, I must express my reservations about President-elect Donald Trump’s proposal to establish a national Bitcoin reserve. My time spent managing the US national gold reserve during Bill Clinton’s administration has given me a unique perspective on the challenges and potential pitfalls of such initiatives.

The suggestion put forward by the incoming President Donald Trump to create a countrywide Bitcoin reserve has sparked a torrent of criticisms from financial specialists, among them being the former Treasury Secretary, Larry Summers.

In a recent interview, Summers – who oversaw the U.S. national gold reserve during Bill Clinton’s presidency – labeled the concept as “unconventional” and questioned its intended purpose.

Bitcoin Reserve Proposal As ‘Politically Motivated’

In simpler terms, during the discussion, Summers expressed doubts about the idea of holding Bitcoin in a national reserve. While storing physical assets such as gold and oil is logical, he argued that due to its intangible and non-reproducible nature (often referred to as a “sterile inventory”), Bitcoin doesn’t seem suitable for long-term storage.

He implied that the only purpose behind this action seems to be winning over benefactors who generously support political campaigns, rather than being economically beneficial. In other words, it appears more politically driven than based on solid economic principles.

Trump’s proposed strategy, initially suggested back in July at a Bitcoin gathering, intends to establish a specialized stockpile of this digital currency to bolster American fiscal security and respond effectively to financial or political adversaries.

The incoming president has voiced worries that should the U.S. fail to take action, nations such as China could exploit this chance to control the digital currency sector. “They’ll be doing it if we don’t,” Trump cautioned during a campaign event.

As an analyst, I’m advocating for a strategic move: Senator Cynthia Lummis, with her pro-crypto stance, has proposed a legislative action that, if passed, would enable the US government to acquire approximately one million Bitcoins over a five-year period. This equates to roughly 5% of the global supply.

This substantial reserve, estimated at close to $100 billion, is being advocated as a possible solution for lowering our nation’s staggering debt of around $36 trillion without resorting to tax increases. It could also bolster the strength of our currency by expanding the variety of assets held by the government.

Super PACs Back Trump’s Crypto Agenda

As a researcher studying the dynamics of cryptocurrencies, I’ve noticed that investor optimism, particularly surrounding President Trump’s stance on digital currencies, has significantly influenced Bitcoin’s recent price spike, pushing it beyond $100,000. It seems that Super Political Action Committees (PACs) with ties to the crypto industry have been investing substantial amounts in Trump’s campaign, thereby creating a political climate that appears favorable for pro-crypto legislators to gain influence.

To further shape his administration’s crypto policy, Trump has announced plans to create a crypto advisory council, with executives from leading cryptocurrency firms showing interest in participating. 

Furthermore, it was announced that tech investor David Sacks will assume the role of AI and cryptocurrency advisor in the White House, where he will be responsible for creating regulatory guidelines for this rapidly expanding sector.

On the other hand, not all individuals believe that maintaining a national Bitcoin reserve is a wise course of action. Detractors, like Peter Schiff who serves as CEO of Euro Pacific Precious Metals, have raised doubts about Bitcoin’s instability and the potential dangers associated with using public funds to acquire such an asset, due to its volatility and perceived risks.

Shiff cautioned that if the government interferes with Bitcoin, it may trigger a harmful loop where people keep buying more, which could erode the strength of the U.S. dollar over time.

In a recent post on social media platform X, Schiff stated, “Indeed, a stockpile of something you can’t resell and need to continually purchase offers no value as a reserve.” He warned that artificially preserving the perceived value of a Bitcoin reserve might compel the government to keep purchasing, which would in turn erode the dollar’s worth.

Currently, the most prominent cryptocurrency is hovering around $97,933, marking a 1.5% drop over the past 24 hours.

Read More

2024-12-10 19:42