Australia Crypto Industry Slams ASIC Digital Asset Regulation Draft Changes

by

As a seasoned analyst with extensive experience in the financial sector, particularly within the realm of digital assets, I find the recent move by Australia’s ASIC to seek feedback on crypto guidance both intriguing and concerning. On one hand, it’s encouraging to see regulators taking steps towards providing clarity on how traditional market rules apply to digital assets, fostering a responsible financial innovation environment while ensuring consumer protection.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) recently unveiled a new discussion document, offering significant revisions to its guidance on digital assets and associated financial products. This update aims to offer clearer insight into how traditional financial product standards apply to cryptocurrencies, potentially impacting their regulation. Critics within the crypto industry, however, argue that this adjustment may advantage larger corporations at the expense of smaller market participants, potentially driving them out of business.

Australia’s ASIC Seeks Feedback on Crypto Guidance

Australia’s leading financial oversight body, ASIC, recently published Consultation Paper 381 (CP 381), detailing revisions to Information Sheet 225 (INFO 225) concerning Integrated Exchange and Trading Hubs (IETH) and related financial products. These updates aim to clarify how certain traditional market rules can be applied to digital assets, offering more transparency in this rapidly evolving sector.

Commissioner Alan Kirkland underscored the necessity of maintaining a balance between fostering financially responsible advancements and safeguarding consumers’ interests. In simpler terms, he highlighted the need to strike a balance between promoting innovative financial practices while ensuring consumer protection.

Our goal is to foster financial advancements that are both accountable and ethical, all the while safeguarding consumers. By maintaining a regulated financial structure, we can boost community trust, preserve market honesty, and encourage healthy competition and innovation.

Kirkland additionally pointed out that Australia’s regulatory system is both extensive and technology-agnostic, making it possible for digital assets to fit within the current structure of financial products. Moreover, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is inviting opinions on crucial matters, such as:

  • The application of existing financial services licensing processes to digital asset businesses.
  • The regulatory challenges related to wrapped tokens and stablecoins.
  • The potential for regulatory relief for businesses transitioning to new regimes.

As a crypto investor, I understand that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has announced updates to INFO 225, which they’ll be consulting on until February 28, 2025. They will then publish a final version of this information in mid-2025 after reviewing all feedback received during the consultation period.

Furthermore, it plans to persistently employ its regulatory measures to safeguard consumers and uphold market authenticity within the digital currency sector. These regulations will likewise apply to some prominent cryptocurrency trading platforms in Australia.

Crypto Industry Experts Slam the Move

Experts in the cryptocurrency field predict that adherence to compliance will no longer be a choice but a necessity under the updated regulatory framework. It’s likely that industry participants will carefully assess this requirement. Additionally, there is increasing apprehension that ASIC’s draft guidance might expose crypto startups to risk, potentially leading to a significant departure of firms from Australia.

Crypto lawyer Joni Pirovich commented on LinkedIn that the updated guidance could make launching a crypto business in Australia “as costly as, or even more expensive than, launching offshore”. She added:

As a crypto investor hailing from Australia, I find myself contemplating the challenges faced by local innovators who wish to enter the market. Given the current regulatory landscape, it seems prudent for those eager to launch now to consider setting up shop offshore. This is due to the steep increase in compliance costs that Australian-based entities must navigate.

Liam Hennessy, a partner at Clyde and Co law firm, expressed sentiments that resonated with this idea. He stated: “Clearly, larger companies will find it easier to cope with the burdens of regulations and legal costs that come along with them. On the other hand, smaller businesses might face challenges.

Furthermore, he also welcomed the shift toward more definite regulations. In his words, “This regulatory guidance is a substantial step for the market. Any move that brings regulatory clarity benefits the market.

The Changing Digital Assets Regulation and Landscape

The digital assets sector in Australia is undergoing transformation due to international trends and the introduction of crypto Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). In response to increasing regulation clarity, asset manager Monochrome introduced its Ethereum ETF (IETH) as demand surges locally. Cryptocurrency investment products are also becoming popular due to shifts in global regulations and growing acceptance.

In light of regulatory advancements, crypto companies, including Circle, are considering growth opportunities in Australia. Notably, Circle has revealed plans to extend its USDC stablecoin activities into Australia, working closely with Mark Carnegie’s MHC Digital Group, a venture capitalist firm. The collaboration aims to utilize Australia’s strong financial foundation, thereby increasing the usefulness and accessibility of USDC within the region.

Read More

2024-12-04 14:18