Bitcoin Origin Story? Irrelevant Now, Says Anthony Pompliano

by

As a seasoned researcher who has witnessed the evolution of digital currencies over the past decade, I find myself increasingly captivated by the narrative surrounding Bitcoin (BTC). While the debate about its origin may continue to rage on in financial circles, my focus lies elsewhere – on the profound implications of its design.

As a researcher delving into the realm of cryptocurrency, I find myself frequently returning to the genesis story of Bitcoin (BTC). However, according to crypto expert Anthony Pompliano, it’s no longer the central point of discussion that we should be fixated on. The criticism often levied against Bitcoin’s creation out of nothing is misguided, as he argues the real concern lies not in the birth of Bitcoin but rather in the ongoing creation of traditional currencies.

Recently, during an online conversation with David Andolfato, Pompliano highlighted the main contrast between Bitcoin’s restricted supply and the seemingly endless emission of fiat currencies.

The fundamental issue underlying broader debates on inflation and monetary policy revolves around the criticism towards fiat currency, which is frequently criticized for devaluing over time due to its excessive abundance. Economist Andolfato, among others, has even drawn parallels between Bitcoin and fiat currencies, suggesting that both were essentially created out of nothing.

The focus of the question isn’t on the initial formation, but instead on the continuous development. If there was a limit to the number of dollars in existence and nobody could create more, then these problems wouldn’t linger.

— Anthony Pompliano 🌪 (@APompliano) December 7, 2024

What makes Bitcoin unique is that its supply is both restricted and managed decententially – a strategic decision taken by the anonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. The intention was to develop a digital currency for peer-to-peer transactions with only 21 million coins in circulation, as determined by the underlying algorithm. This scarcity mirrors gold’s characteristics, thus earning Bitcoin the nickname “digital gold.” Crucially, the supply of Bitcoin cannot be influenced by any central authority.

With Bitcoin gaining broader acceptance, an increasing number of institutional and private investors are jumping in. The conversation has moved away from its origins and now centers around its performance and potential role as a hedge against inflation.

2021 has witnessed Bitcoin’s substantial expansion, nearing $100,000 per unit. Remarkably, its value has escalated by more than 136% since the start of the year, surpassing the performance of conventional safe-haven assets such as gold, which also experienced a notable increase of approximately 27.6% during the same timeframe.

Read More

2024-12-08 19:13