Bitcoin to Zero? The Curious Tale of Value and Faith

by

The world calls Bitcoin a sign and a doctrine, and in such garments it travels, like a herald in a snowbound village, proclaiming that value may be born of belief rather than coin or field. Yet the hearts of men are not so easily convinced; they remember the bread of yesterday and wonder if the bread today is merely pastry. The sages of skepticism murmur that the flame may die, and in their murmurs there is a sort of laughter, as if to say: what a grand masquerade is this digital coin, conjured by speculation and carried by bravado more than by substance.

could the world’s largest ciphered dream be worth nothing at all? As prices drift downward and faith trembles, the notion of a Bitcoin to zero returns, not with a shout but with the quiet irony of a sermon interrupted by a snicker, and markets lend an ear as if to test the sincerity of such a prophecy.

Zero‑dollar thesis resurfaces

The spark this week came from a commentator who writes in a manner both stern and theatrical, Buck Sexton, who proclaimed that “every time I ask a Bitcoin true believer to explain why they think it has any long-term value… I come away more certain that Bitcoin has no long-term value, and a floor price of zero.” His message, catching fire as Bitcoin slid more than a fifth in a short time, repeats an old refrain: in a crisis of confidence, an asset with no cash flows and no legal claim on any tangible thing has, as they say in the market, no fundamental floor. One might smile at the boldness of that claim, as if a village gossip could measure the weight of a sun with a simple scale.

Richard Farr, chief market strategist at Pivotus Partners, cuts more bluntly, noting that his firm’s target is “$0.0,” and arguing that Bitcoin has “failed as a hedge against the dollar,” tracks the temperament of high‑beta technology, and has not gained genuine traction as money. “The miners (the network) are bleeding cash,” he writes. “We think it’s a zero.” The tone suggests a man who has counted coins and found fewer than expected, perhaps with a smirk that a weary man might wear after a long march and a longer argument.

Belief versus utility

Once again, the voice of Peter Schiff, long the antagonist in this drama, contrasts Bitcoin with his gold. He insists that “Bitcoin’s value is purely subjective, as it has no utility beyond belief.” “Bitcoin can’t do anything. That’s the problem,” he adds. “Yes you can store and transfer your Bitcoin, but beyond that you can’t do anything with it.” This critique aligns with the academy’s warnings that non‑yielding assets soon become hostages to reflexive flows, a fate previously seen during the waves that swept through 2018 and 2022.

Yet the ferocity of the latest counterwave also exposes how deeply the asset has become a creature of financial tides, tethered to macro risk cycles and ETF streams rather than to the old cypherpunk vows. Sexton himself contends that the anger of online champions is partly the problem, gnawing away at mainstream trust just as regulators and financiers demand more discipline-a comic tragedy in which virtue is measured by the speed of a tweet rather than by the heft of a deed.

Market snapshot

The debate unfolds as digital assets wander through another stretch of risk aversion. Bitcoin hovers near seventy thousand dollars, up a modest margin in a day, with a volume that speaks of bustling yet uneasy markets. Ethereum tilts around two thousand and change, and Solana remains a restless horse near its own fence, with volume that suggests both interest and doubt. The numbers are not arithmetic so much as a symptom: a fragile equilibrium in which every tremor is a moral test of trust and a test of nerves for those who live by the fluctuating breath of the market.

These skittish flows mirror broader anxieties-conditions tightening like a winter coat, volatility returning to equity markets-factors that have historically battered high‑beta crypto assets. The “zero” narrative, then, is less a precise forecast than a crucible for Bitcoin’s maturing, not yet steady, social contract.

Related coverage: Bitcoin’s correlation with tech stocks has repeatedly surged during risk‑off waves, challenging the romance of digital gold. Ethereum’s evolving fee and burn dynamics illuminate how protocol cash‑flow narratives can bolster perceived intrinsic value. Solana’s dramatic swings reveal how execution risk and network strain still shape the market’s tolerance for ambitious experiments in decentralized promises.

Read More

2026-02-09 17:04