Caitlyn Jenner, Memecoins & A Missed Court Drama: The JENNER Token Lawsuit Gets Ghosted

by

So, picture this: a U.S. federal court in California just yeeted the JENNER Token Lawsuit right out the window. The case? Someone decided Caitlyn Jenner and her manager, Sophia Hutchins, were to blame for all their coin-induced woes (honestly, who else but celebrities to blame for our questionable financial decisions?). Accusations ranged from fraud to “you didn’t warn me crypto is wild”—classic. Except, little plot twist: the judge ruled that the plaintiffs, who really wanted their day in American court, are, in fact, British. 🇬🇧 No US jurisdiction, no drama. Gavel down.

The judge, ever the tease, told the plaintiffs they could try again (because, why not) but handed them a deadline: May 23, 2025, says the legal equivalent of “slide into my DMs, but only if you’ve got receipts.” Meanwhile, Jenner and Hutchins will be waiting with the energy of someone who’s just realized they probably won’t have to read this script again (but also, June 6th if there’s a sequel).

Oh Darling, Why Was the Lawsuit Chucked?

Our leading man, Lee Greenfield, is a UK chap who apparently spent $40,000 trying to become the Wolf of Crypto Street. Trouble is, the court wanted proof that his tragic JENNER Token shopping spree happened on U.S. soil, not just on the internet, which, last checked, is not geographically specific (except to lawyers). No proof, no American lawsuit. Even Caitlyn’s liquidity is apparently lost in the nebulous cloud of “somewhere, maybe, wherever blockchains live.”

“The lawsuit alleges no facts regarding where or how Jenner provided this liquidity,” Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. probably said while staring over bifocals and reconsidering law as a career choice.

Greenfield mentioned buying magic coins on Ethereum and Solana, because apparently one blockchain just isn’t enough pain. The court, unfazed, ruled this as “nice try, but still not the USA.” All nine (yes, NINE) legal theories got benched. Not to be outdone by this meme-worthy moment, the court even referenced Conor McGregor’s memecoin belly flop—because why let any celebrity avoid crypto embarrassment?

An Instant Classic: Two Jenner Tokens Walk into a Blockchain

The first JENNER token dropped May 2024 via Solana and Pump Fun (the sequel you didn’t ask for, but got anyway, hit Ethereum right after). If you’re already confused, don’t worry—the buyers were too, and allegedly lost money as the token’s value became as blurred as Caitlyn’s alleged endorsement schedule. Extra spicy? Jenner apparently launched another memecoin, $BBARK, in between, because why have one questionable coin when you can have three? 🙄

Not only is Jenner getting grilled, but even President Trump (!) is now being poked by Elizabeth Warren (never thought you’d read “Trump” and “memecoin” in the same lawsuit, right?). Everyone wants a piece of these sweet, sweet blockchain shenanigans.

Greenfield’s plucky legal team insisted Jenner raked in a 3% fee with every Ethereum token trade. The court yawned and said, “Show me the emails or something more than a fever dream.” The sidekick, Hutchins, was also accused of playing crypto Robin to Jenner’s Batman, but again, the judge did not see enough to get out of bed.

The Court’s Pep Talk: Come Back With Evidence (But Don’t Change Leads!)

So, dismissed. But the door’s open for an encore performance—if (and only if) the UK plaintiff can get specific: who, what, where, and how many memes did you lose? Oh, and the judge kindly requested, “Don’t get creative with a new American lead—you play with the lawyer you brought.” 🎭

Jack Fitzgerald (of Fitzgerald Monroe Flynn PC, a name that would look great on a legal drama poster) declares they’re not done. “We might have something,” he teased, as if promising a mid-season cliffhanger.

Cue the Price Action Montage: Token Freefall!

As the court delivered its best Ariana Grande “thank you, next,” the JENNER token price did its own dramatic swan dive: from a glitzy $7.5 million high in June 2024 to $492K in May 2025. Sprinkle on a trading volume of $103K—it’s not nothing, but it’s also not Lamborghini money. For those still holding the bag, the price had a tiny 2% bounce (which, in crypto, is the equivalent of finding ten quid in your jeans).

Investors are understandably nervous, probably refreshing price charts with the same energy as someone tracking exes on Instagram. The court hasn’t even decided if JENNER counts as a security yet—future drama, perhaps. The only thing more volatile than this token? Hollywood egos.

Read More

2025-05-13 22:21