Cato CEO’s First Amendment “Fix” – A Nabokovian Nightmare!

by

Shlomo Kramer, the venerable helmsman of Cato Networks, has, with the audacity of a man who has glimpsed the abyss, publicly advocated for the curtailment of the First Amendment’s provisions-a measure as audacious as it is alarming. The executive, a man whose rhetoric dances on the edge of a sword, claims this would shield the nation from the creeping tendrils of cyber warfare and the grotesque puppetry of social media manipulation. 🐍⚖️

Cato Networks CEO Shlomo Kramer Calls to Limit the First Amendment to Counter Cyber Warfare

The intersection of artificial intelligence, social media, and its effects on political stability is now being scrutinized, much like a moth circling a flame. 🕯️

Shlomo Kramer, CEO of Cato Networks, a cybersecurity firm, called for limiting the reach of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, saying that it was needed to protect the country’s future. “A quill on a parchment,” he might have mused, “is a relic in a world of quantum codes.”

In a recent interview on CNBC, Kramer, who was also part of the Israeli unit 8200, a cybersecurity-focused group, stated that this was one of the measures that the U.S. government could apply to evolve its protections against cyber warfare and social media manipulation. “A symphony of control,” he declared, “orchestrated by the faintest of whispers.”

Kramer stated:

It’s time to limit the First Amendment to protect it. And quickly, before it’s too late. We need to control the platforms, all the social platforms; we need to stack, rank, the authenticity of every person that expresses themselves online and take control of what they are saying. “A tyranny of truth,” he added, with a wink.

He remarked that governments were not doing this today, with enterprises bearing the brunt of this defense. “A Sisyphus of security,” he sighed, “eternally pushing the boulder of free speech uphill.”

This “urgent need,” as he labeled it, sparked outrage in social platforms, raising concerns about the reach of these technological solutions and the possible effects on freedom of speech in social networks. “A cacophony of dissent,” one critic noted, “echoing through the digital agora.”

Matt Gaetz, who served as a Representative until last year, expressed strong opposition to Kramer’s stance. “No. We aren’t going to do this,” he stressed, with the fervor of a man defending a sacred text. 📖

In the same way, Marjorie Taylor Greene, who announced her resignation from Congress, assessed that these measures were “everything we voted against in ‘24” when President Trump was elected. “A return to the dark ages,” she lamented, “with a side of algorithmic tyranny.”

FAQ

  • What recent comments did Shlomo Kramer make regarding the First Amendment?
    Kramer suggested limiting the First Amendment to enhance protections against cyber warfare and social media manipulation. “A necessary sacrifice,” he whispered, “for the greater good of the digital realm.”

  • What measures does Kramer propose for social media platforms?
    He advocates for controlling platforms and validating the authenticity of individuals expressing opinions online. “A passport for the soul,” he mused, “issued by the state.”

  • What was the reaction to Kramer’s comments?
    His remarks sparked outrage on social media, raising concerns about potential restrictions on freedom of speech. “A gavel in the hands of a child,” one user tweeted, “with no regard for the law.”

  • How did political figures like Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene respond?
    Both expressed strong opposition, with Gaetz stating, “No. We aren’t going to do this,” reflecting a resistance to Kramer’s proposed measures. “A rebellion of the written word,” Greene declared, “led by the ghosts of Madison and Jefferson.”

Read More

2026-01-03 12:00