As a seasoned analyst with over two decades of experience in financial markets, I find Coinbase’s stance on this matter both insightful and compelling. Having witnessed the evolution of various market structures, I can appreciate the value that prediction markets bring to the table, fostering innovation and promoting economic growth.
In their extensive response to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Coinbase Global, Inc. strongly objected to the commission’s suggested ban on specific types of forecasting markets. The digital currency exchange contends that the proposed changes exceed the CFTC’s legal jurisdiction. Furthermore, they emphasized that this proposal overlooks the importance and benefits of prediction markets.
Coinbase Opposes CFTC’s Action On Betting Markets
Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s top legal officer, argued that the proposed regulations would significantly change existing regulatory norms. Additionally, he wrote to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) expressing concerns about the proposal’s vague and expansive definition of “gaming.” He fears this could lead to a wide-reaching ban on prediction markets.
According to Grewal, the Commission overlooked the beneficial effects of forecasting markets on the economy. He further highlighted that such a ban could hinder progress and expansion in controlled marketplaces. Moreover, the CFTC’s plan aims to classify specific contractual agreements as “gambling,” making them forbidden under forthcoming regulations.
According to the crypto exchange’s perspective, this definition is too general and doesn’t adhere to the principles outlined in the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA). Grewal contends that the Commission’s methodology strays from a traditional practice of assessing contracts individually, and unfairly applies a blanket prohibition without just cause.
In simpler terms, the cryptocurrency trading platform argues that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) may be exceeding its authority. The Commodity Exchange Act allows designated marketplaces (DCMs) to list event contracts using a self-certification process. However, these contracts should not involve illegal activities or those that go against public interest.
Moreover, Grewal argues that the CFTC’s Proposal strays from this framework by imposing a broad ban using a wide interpretation of “gaming.” He urges the Commission to reconsider and withdraw the Proposal. Furthermore, he emphasizes that this method would strip both the Commission and market participants of essential decision-making power.
In simpler terms, the proposal describes what it means by “gaming” in a way that Coinbase believes contradicts the original purpose of the law and traditional understanding. It suggests adding agreements linked to elections, honors, and other non-sporting competitions as examples of gaming. However, Grewal argues this expansion of the term is not accurate.
As a crypto investor, I’d say, “I doubt many would concur with me that the processes behind elections or prestigious awards like Nobel Prizes and Oscars can be categorized as something akin to games.” Grewal pointed this out.
Read More
- USD ZAR PREDICTION
- SOL PREDICTION. SOL cryptocurrency
- EUR ILS PREDICTION
- CKB PREDICTION. CKB cryptocurrency
- SEILOR PREDICTION. SEILOR cryptocurrency
- RIDE PREDICTION. RIDE cryptocurrency
- PLI PREDICTION. PLI cryptocurrency
- BLACK PREDICTION. BLACK cryptocurrency
- MENDI PREDICTION. MENDI cryptocurrency
- SSE PREDICTION. SSE cryptocurrency
2024-08-09 09:00