Coinbase CLO Accuses FDIC of Anti-Crypto Campaign

by

As a seasoned crypto investor with over a decade of experience in this dynamic industry, I find myself deeply concerned about the latest developments between Coinbase and the regulatory bodies, particularly the FDIC. Paul Grewal’s recent statements highlight a troubling trend that seems to suggest an opaque and restrictive approach towards law-abiding American companies operating in the crypto space.

Paul Grewal, the Chief Legal Officer at Coinbase, mentioned that things are getting more transparent as they’ve started receiving details from the FDIC following their Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) inquiry regarding hold letters dispatched to financial institutions under Operation Chokepoint 2.0.

He described the contents of these letters as an unsettling sign that a government agency might be trying to limit financial opportunities for legitimate U.S. corporations.

Grewal’s remarks underscore the importance of openness when it comes to regulatory procedures, and they bring up issues related to how this could affect the world of digital currencies.

Coinbase CLO: FDIC Blocking Crypto Banking

Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, stated that there is now more transparency regarding Coinbase’s situation with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). In a recent post, he mentioned that the agency has started providing documents in response to Coinbase’s request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for records related to the pause letters sent to financial institutions as part of Operation Chokepoint 2.0, following the lawsuit.

Gradually, the situation is clarifying. Following our lawsuit, the FDIC has begun providing us with details regarding our FOIA request concerning the ‘pause’ letters they dispatched to financial institutions during Operation Chokepoint 2.0. To put it succinctly, these documents reveal a regrettable instance…

— paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) November 1, 2024

Grewal stated that the letters’ content suggested an attempt by a government agency to obstruct legal U.S. firms from securing funding, which was troubling.

As a researcher delving into the realm of banking and cryptocurrency, I’ve identified over twenty instances where the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has advised banks to halt, abstain from offering, and avoid progressing with crypto-banking services. Moreover, I expressed concerns about the lack of transparency in their operations, arguing that they often operate behind a veil of bureaucracy, rather than engaging in open dialogue and discussion.

Coinbase Takes on Regulators, Demands Clear Crypto Rules

Over the past week, Coinbase has stepped up its efforts for regulatory transparency by submitting multiple Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). This action is simply the latest in a series of moves made by the cryptocurrency exchange to secure definitive guidance on how the U.S. government plans to regulate digital assets.

As a researcher, I am focusing on unearthing documents that delve into the specific limitations set by the FDIC regarding the amount of digital assets that U.S. deposit institutions are permitted to hold.

Additionally, Coinbase is seeking documents that explain how the FDIC has handled Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests regarding cryptocurrencies since 2022. This could help Coinbase understand patterns in the processing of such queries related to digital currencies.

A few weeks ago, I made a strategic move by filing a lawsuit against the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in Washington, D.C., following their persistent refusal to answer my Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. These requests were made on grounds that their non-response might potentially impede law enforcement operations. The timing couldn’t be more opportune, as this action coincides with another lawsuit I’ve initiated against the SEC in the federal appeals court in Philadelphia.

The legal action underway aims to compel the regulatory body to establish definite guidelines specifically designed for cryptocurrencies, addressing one of the main criticisms within the sector: the absence of clear guidance provided by regulators.

According to a recent report from the Blockchain Association, a prominent organization in the cryptocurrency sector that includes Coinbase among its members, these companies have expressed significant financial strain as a result of measures taken by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), particularly under the leadership of Chair Gary Gensler.

Shedding Light on Regulators’ Approach to Crypto

In June, Coinbase initiated lawsuits against both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The purpose was to compel these regulatory bodies to disclose documents regarding their inquiries into the cryptocurrency market. These legal actions were taken under the Freedom of Information Act, marking another step in Coinbase’s ongoing dispute with the SEC. Previously, the SEC had alleged that Coinbase was operating an unregistered securities exchange.

Lawsuits were initiated in Washington D.C.’s district court by History Associates, a consulting firm Coinbase retained for record acquisition. Later, Grewal pointed out additional complex issues, including the FDIC’s influence on banks to discontinue ties with cryptocurrency-related operations. The documents sought from the SEC pertain to concluded investigations that could offer greater insight into the regulator’s stance towards digital assets, such as its recent probe into Ethereum, which it had declared not a security in 2018.

As a researcher, I too advocate for correspondence from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) urging banks to temporarily cease cryptocurrency activities. This action is prompted by the criticism leveled against the FDIC by its Office of Inspector General, as such a move could potentially impede innovation in the burgeoning digital currency sector.

Without a doubt, Coinbase Global Inc stands firm against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), criticizing their regulatory tactics through enforcement. As part of this ongoing dispute, the company has submitted an Amicus Brief, representing the interests of DeFi Education Fund and Beba.

Read More

2024-11-01 23:28