Coinbase v. SEC: Here’s Latest Update as SEC Drops Key Filing

As a seasoned crypto investor with over a decade of experience navigating the dynamic and complex landscape of digital assets, I find myself closely following the ongoing legal battles between major players like Coinbase and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The recent updates on Coinbase’s case are particularly intriguing, as they shed light on the SEC’s inconsistent views on digital assets and its regulatory reach.

Regarding the current court case between Coinbase and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Coinbase’s top legal official, Paul Grewal, recently posted an update about something specific in response to the SEC’s recent court submission.

I recently received news that Coinbase, where I have investments, has requested crucial documents from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These documents could potentially reveal inconsistencies in the SEC’s stance towards digital assets and the extent of their regulatory jurisdiction. As an investor, I find this development significant as it may impact the future regulations affecting our investments in this space.

Grewal emphasized the importance of openness, pointing out that since the SEC plans to implement a unique regulatory strategy through enforcement actions, the bare minimum they should provide to those affected and the general public is transparency.

In July, Coinbase asked the court to compel the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to provide crucial documents as part of the discovery process. These documents encompassed those pertaining to the tokens mentioned in the SEC’s lawsuit against Coinbase, the SEC’s evaluation of its initial public offering, and statements made by Chair Gensler both personally and professionally during his tenure at the SEC.

These records are related to discussions that are crucial for both the arguments the SEC is making currently, and Coinbase’s claim of being properly informed in advance.

In their reaction, the SEC proposed denying Coinbase’s request, arguing that the task of sifting through and recording over 3 million additional documents is disproportionate as most of these files pertain to SEC commissioners or executives, and thus, their relevance cannot be sufficiently justified.

According to the SEC, they have generated approximately 240,000 records and are currently reviewing an additional 117,000 potentially relevant documents, such as emails from staff not involved in enforcement. Coinbase contends that these communications are essential for a fair understanding of the notice provided. Additionally, the SEC has disclosed a list of 648 pages detailing documents they are legally withholding due to privilege.

Recent crypto regulatory developments

In a new twist in the Binance lawsuit, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has stopped asking the court to classify the tokens mentioned in the case as securities.

As a researcher, on July 30th, I noted that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced its intention to modify its lawsuit concerning “Third-Party Crypto Asset Securities.” This action was disclosed in the SEC’s response to Binance’s motion to dismiss.

In the last month, stablecoin issuer Paxos announced that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission had concluded an inquiry related to Binance USD stablecoin (BUSD).

Approximately a year ago, Paxos disclosed that they had been given a warning (Wells notice) by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC was contemplating suggesting potential action against Binance USD, claiming it might be an unregistered security.

Read More

• SOL PREDICTION. SOL cryptocurrency
• LUNC PREDICTION. LUNC cryptocurrency
• ENA PREDICTION. ENA cryptocurrency
• BTC PREDICTION. BTC cryptocurrency
• SHIB PREDICTION. SHIB cryptocurrency
• USD PHP PREDICTION
• Red Dead Redemption: Undead Nightmare – Where To Find Sasquatch
• USD COP PREDICTION
• USD ZAR PREDICTION
• CAKE PREDICTION. CAKE cryptocurrency

2024-08-06 16:18