As a seasoned crypto investor with over a decade of experience navigating the ever-evolving digital asset landscape, I find myself closely following the latest developments between Coinbase and the SEC. This back-and-forth is akin to watching two heavyweights dance in the ring – each jabbing, parrying, and countering with precision.
On August 12th, Coinbase stepped up its campaign against the US Securities and Exchange Commission, urging the commission to disclose internal documents. In legal terms, this is known as a Reply Memorandum of Law by Coinbase, which bolsters their request for the SEC to meet their discovery obligations.
Last week, Coinbase’s demands for Gary Gensler’s personal crypto-related emails from the SEC were met with resistance in a court filing to the Southern District Court of New York. The SEC labeled these requests as extremely wide-ranging, claiming they are unnecessary and could unfairly burden the regulatory body.
Coinbase Doesn’t Back Down
Coinbase’s statement is critical of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for not thoroughly examining documents from staff outside their Enforcement Division, such as those belonging to SEC commissioners and the Trading and Markets Division. Instead of using these documents to foster a productive discussion, the SEC has chosen to use them to limit, rather than aid, an efficient discovery process, according to Coinbase’s memorandum.
The filing contends that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been selective when searching and producing documents, claiming that they exaggerated the burden of production by a factor of four. Coinbase criticizes the SEC’s resistance to review documents from sources outside their Enforcement Division, pointing out the importance of specific communications highlighted in other legal proceedings, including the Ripple case.
One ongoing issue of debate is the SEC’s unwillingness to investigate whether Chair Gensler utilizes his private email for discussions pertinent to the core matters in this lawsuit. The filing states, “Regarding Chair Gensler, the SEC declines to question if he receives or sends relevant emails from his personal account.” The cryptocurrency exchange contends that Gensler’s personal correspondence may hold crucial information relevant to the case, and asserts that the SEC’s lack of interest in examining these communications is unreasonable.
Coinbase contends that the SEC should be required to look for evidence related to Coinbase’s defense of a fair notice. Previously, the SEC had declared this defense as no longer valid and stated they would only search for such evidence if the court confirmed it was still relevant in the case. Now that the court has made that confirmation, the SEC continues to claim that the documents are not important to the case. This is the argument put forth by the exchange.
Furthermore, Coinbase requires that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) log all documents they review and choose not to disclose, as mandated by a court order following Rule 502(d). This requirement underscores the importance of these procedures for maintaining a just legal process, with the platform prepared to collaborate with the SEC to determine the details of the search methodology.
At press time, COIN traded at $191.74.
Read More
- ENA PREDICTION. ENA cryptocurrency
- LUNC PREDICTION. LUNC cryptocurrency
- SOL PREDICTION. SOL cryptocurrency
- USD PHP PREDICTION
- BTC PREDICTION. BTC cryptocurrency
- SHIB PREDICTION. SHIB cryptocurrency
- Red Dead Redemption: Undead Nightmare – Where To Find Sasquatch
- USD COP PREDICTION
- BRISE PREDICTION. BRISE cryptocurrency
- VINU/USD
2024-08-13 14:41