Crypto vs. Banks: The Wilde Satire of Modern Finance 🎭

by

Ah, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), that illustrious congregation of financial architects, has devised a most ingenious contraption-a “chokepoint,” if you will-designed to smother the vibrant spirit of crypto with all the subtlety of a Victorian corset. Or so claims Chris Perkins, president of CoinFund, who seems to have developed quite the flair for dramatic metaphor.

These capital requirements, dear reader, are not merely rules; they are the very chains that bind banks to mediocrity. By forcing higher reserve requirements for holding crypto, these regulations lower a bank’s return on equity (ROE), rendering crypto-related activities as appealing as a soggy cucumber sandwich at a garden party. “It’s a different type of chokepoint,” Perkins quipped to CryptoMoon, “in that it’s not direct. It’s a very nuanced way of suppressing activity by making it so expensive for the bank to do anything that they’re just like, ‘I can’t.’” 😩

And why should they bother? After all, Perkins muses, “If I have a certain amount of capital I want to invest, I’m going to invest it in high ROE businesses, not low ROE businesses.” How pragmatic, how ruthlessly efficient! One might almost mistake him for a character in one of Wilde’s plays-a man torn between profit and principle, sipping tea while the world burns. 🍵🔥

In April, Perkins took aim at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), accusing it of attempting to impose legacy banking regulations-those relics of a bygone era-onto decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols and stablecoins. He declared such efforts an affront to the core principles of permissionless networks. Oh, the irony! Traditional finance, clinging to its KYC forms and weekend closures, refuses to adapt, while crypto dances merrily into the future, shifting liquidity in real time like a mischievous sprite. ✨💸

Yet the BIS remains steadfast in its crusade against this digital insurgency. In a report released earlier this year, the organization warned that crypto could destabilize the financial system-a claim as predictable as a butler delivering bad news in Act III. The authors even had the audacity to suggest that crypto exacerbates wealth inequality, as though the current state of global economics were a paragon of egalitarian virtue. Truly, their wit is as sharp as a butter knife. 🗡️🧀

Then came June, and another report titled “Stablecoin Growth: Policy Challenges and Approaches,” which proclaimed that stablecoins fail as money and pose systemic risks. “Potential spillovers to [the traditional financial] system can no longer be ruled out,” the authors wrote, perhaps unaware that sounding alarmist is rarely convincing when your audience consists largely of people under 40. 🚨📉

Meanwhile, the BIS continues to champion central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) as the “solution” to privately-issued cryptocurrencies. How quaint! Centralized control masquerading as innovation-it’s enough to make one weep into their monocle. But fear not, for the battle lines have been drawn, and the stage is set for a clash of ideologies worthy of Wilde himself. Will tradition triumph, or shall progress prevail? Only time-and perhaps a well-timed epigram-will tell. ⏳🎭

Read More

2025-08-17 01:17