As a seasoned analyst with over two decades of experience navigating the complexities of financial markets and regulatory landscapes, I find myself intrigued by this week’s events in the crypto sphere. The back-and-forth between Gary Gensler and members of the crypto community, particularly Billy Markus, is a fascinating display of the tension between innovation and regulation.
This week, cryptocurrency market discussions were centered around Congressional hearings in the U.S., focusing on cryptocurrency regulations. The SEC chair, Gary Gensler, was a main focus and faced intense scrutiny. Critics labeled him as the most destructive and lawless SEC chairman ever due to his policy of enforcement-based regulation, which has been widely criticized.
Moreover, the existing SEC policy, which classifies items such as baseball game tickets as securities, has been subject to criticism.
As an analyst, I’d rephrase it like this: On the brink of upcoming November events, I perceive that Gensler acknowledged the growing unease among people and their representatives, which he attempted to address in a soothing manner during his interview on CNBC today.
In particular, the head of the Securities Commission said that Bitcoin is not a security.
Nakamoto challenges Gensler
This type of discourse has sparked interest among numerous individuals within the cryptocurrency sphere, notably Billy Markus, one of Dogecoin‘s founders who is famously known as Shibetoshi Nakamoto.
Markus suggested that it would be appropriate for Gensler to classify Dogecoin as a non-security too, given that its underlying code is heavily based on Bitcoin and both these digital assets function according to similar principles.
He could express that Dogecoin doesn’t qualify as a security, given its strong similarities with Bitcoin in terms of functionality. Essentially, both function identically.
— Shibetoshi Nakamoto (@BillyM2k) September 26, 2024
Nevertheless, his statement was challenged when it was explained to Markus that in contrast to BTC, DOGE doesn’t have a limited supply. The inventor of the meme currency suggested that this issue could potentially be resolved by modifying some code and gaining the support of the mining community.
Markus asserted that the method in question mirrors Bitcoin’s entirely, implying he believes his opponent may be underestimating their intelligence.
Read More
- SOL PREDICTION. SOL cryptocurrency
- LUNC PREDICTION. LUNC cryptocurrency
- BTC PREDICTION. BTC cryptocurrency
- USD ZAR PREDICTION
- USD CLP PREDICTION
- VANRY PREDICTION. VANRY cryptocurrency
- IQ PREDICTION. IQ cryptocurrency
- ASTO PREDICTION. ASTO cryptocurrency
- EUR RUB PREDICTION
- RBX PREDICTION. RBX cryptocurrency
2024-09-26 18:50