Donald Trump US Election Odds Hit 60% Amid Polymarket Manipulation Claims

As a seasoned researcher with years of experience observing political landscapes and market dynamics, I find myself both intrigued and alarmed by the recent surge in Donald Trump’s odds for the 2024 U.S. presidential election. The sudden shift in probabilities on Polymarket is indeed striking, and it’s hard not to question whether we’re witnessing a case of market manipulation or strategic betting.


According to data from Polymarket, a prediction market platform, the likelihood of Donald Trump, the former U.S. president, prevailing in the 2024 U.S. presidential election has significantly increased. Currently, Trump’s chances are estimated at approximately 60.1%, whereas Vice President Kamala Harris is predicted to have about a 39.8% chance of winning.

The substantial shift we’re seeing now contrasts significantly with earlier this month, when the two candidates were virtually tied in their ratings. The unexpected surge in Trump’s likelihood of victory has sparked considerable interest, with many pondering if it might be attributed to large wagers made by some pro-Trump individuals in the betting market.

Surge in Donald Trump’s Odds Raises Concerns

Lately, there’s been some talk about Polymarket that suggests Donald Trump’s rising odds might be due to heavy investments from a select few. As per the latest news, four users – Fredi9999, Theo4, PrincessCaro, and Michie – have collectively wagered over $25 million on Trump’s victory.

As a researcher, I’ve found compelling evidence suggesting that these substantial transactions may have significantly impacted the market’s perception, potentially tilting the odds in favor of Donald Trump’s electoral success.

It appears that certain accounts, including Fredi9999, have been actively used over the past few weeks in political betting markets. According to Domer, who follows political betting closely, Fredi has been transferring large amounts of money from Kraken, a cryptocurrency exchange, and consistently betting on Trump’s success across various markets. This activity has raised concerns among market observers, as some believe it could potentially be an instance of market manipulation.

Experts Question Market Manipulation

This situation has sparked much debate, as the significant wagers on Polymarket have given off an air of questionable integrity about the platform. Notably, a user named Domer, who is known for political betting under a pseudonym, pointed out that these pro-Trump accounts could intentionally be depositing funds to influence the odds and make it seem like Trump has more support than he actually does.

Domer stated that some users appear to work together, accumulating significant funds and wagering them on the previous U.S. president Trump, which may have boosted his likelihood of winning. For instance, a bet predicting Trump’s victory in the popular vote raised his chances from 26% to 39% within a short timeframe.

Nate Geraci, president of ETF Store, noted the significant activity on Polymarket and suggested it could be an attempt to create the illusion of momentum for Trump. Adam Cochran, a crypto investor who supports Harris, commented that this surge in bets in a prediction market might be used to give Trump a reason to allege that the election was rigged if he loses. Cochran, a Republican voter, further stated that these betting odds could potentially sow doubt about the election results if Trump were to lose.

Bitcoin PAC Supports Trump as US Election Approaches

As the odds of ex-US President Donald Trump reclaiming the presidency seem to rise, it’s worth noting that this trend corresponds with the Bitcoin Voters Political Action Committee, an organization promoting Bitcoin, launching a pro-Trump campaign advertisement.

The ad, now airing in Pennsylvania, underlines the increasing popularity of the former president among the cryptocommunity. 

Meanwhile, Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and a known Trump supporter, highlighted Trump’s advantage on Polymarket, expressing on X (formerly Twitter) that prediction markets are generally more reliable than surveys because actual money is involved in the predictions. This viewpoint aligns with many pro-Trump commentators who have argued that prediction markets are more trustworthy than polls.

Read More

2024-10-19 06:56