Ethereum Developer Prison Term Cut Down by 7 Months

As a researcher who has closely followed the case of Virgil Griffith, an Ethereum developer who was sentenced to prison for violating U.S. sanctions against North Korea, I am elated by the recent news that his prison term has been reduced from 63 months to 56 months. This reduction is a testament to the complexities of the legal system and the nuances of individual circumstances.


As a seasoned observer of the blockchain and cryptocurrency space, I find the recent developments in the case of Virgil Griffith particularly intriguing. Griffith, a renowned Ethereum developer, was initially sentenced to five years in prison for traveling to North Korea in 2019 to deliver a speech on using cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology to bypass international sanctions.

Ethereum Developer Prison Term Cut Down

Based on a court filing dated July 17, District Judge Kevin Castel has decreased Virgil Griffith’s prison term from the initial sentence of 63 months to 56 months. Virgil Griffith is an Ethereum developer who was sentenced in April 2022 by the U.S. courts.

The reasons for lessening Griffith’s penalty took into account his misbehavior and challenges he experienced in prison. Additionally, Castel concurred that the risk Griffith posed to the public due to potential recurring offenses had diminished.

Despite acknowledging that Griffith persisted in disobeying prison rules, Judge Castel emphasized the severity of the appellant’s crime, making a lengthy prison sentence essential.

Exciting update for you all, I’ve got some fantastic news to share! The court has granted our petition to reduce Virgil Griffith’s sentence. Judge Castel decided to cut down the term by a significant seven months. So, get ready, folks – Virgil is coming home sooner than we thought!

— Alexander Urbelis (@aurbelis) July 17, 2024

In early 2021, Griffith admitted guilt for violating sanctions prior to his scheduled trial in New York. Prosecutors alleged that Griffith understood the funds could assist North Korea in evading international sanctions. Nevertheless, Griffith’s legal team requested leniency, emphasizing his lack of criminal record and insignificant financial impact from his actions.

Government Opposition

Griffith’s legal team sought leniency in sentencing and presented evidence of his reformation, as he showed regret for his actions and spent time in reflection while in custody. They recounted an incident where Griffith attempted to avoid a confrontation by reporting the situation to the on-duty officer. Unfortunately, this led to him being relocated and eventually charged with the offense of being absent during the prison count.

After the U.S. sentencing guidelines changed in April, Griffiths’ lawyers requested a reduction of his punishment based on these new rules. The updated guidelines suggested that Griffiths’ recommended sentence range could be lower, potentially leading to his release in January 2025.

In June, U.S. Attorney Damian Williams voiced opposition to the proposed reduction in sentencing for Griffith. He argued that Griffith intentionally helped North Korea, which is adversarial towards the U.S. and has a history of human rights violations. According to Williams, upholding the original sentence was crucial to prevent similar cases from recurring in the future.

Prison Conduct and Sentencing Adjustments

At the Federal Correctional Institute in Milan, Michigan, Griffith faced numerous rule violations. Among these were allegations of attempting to pilfer soap and tea. Prosecutors argued that his disregard for the institution’s regulations was evident from these actions, suggesting he should receive no further leniency.

The U.S. Department of Commerce issued Griffith a decree denying him the right to participate in any US exports involving controlled commodities, software, or technology for a ten-year period, extending until the year 2032 – aside from the ongoing criminal case.

Vitalik Buterin Warns Against ‘Crypto’ Supremacy In Politics

Read More

2024-07-18 00:06