As a seasoned analyst with over two decades of experience in regulatory compliance, I find myself shaking my head at Cryptocom’s decision to sue the SEC. John Reed Stark, former SEC official, has made a compelling case that this move is not only ill-advised but potentially disastrous for the crypto exchange and the broader ecosystem.
According to former SEC official John Reed Stark, Cryptocom’s decision to sue the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is not likely to end well for the exchange or the broader cryptocurrency industry. Instead, he anticipates three main outcomes stemming from this legal action.
Cryptocom Repeats Consensys Lawsuit Against SEC
Stark implied that Cryptocom’s behavior was irrational, as they repeated an error similar to ConsenSys’. Specifically, he pointed out that ConsenSys attempted to prevent legal action from being taken against it immediately after receiving a Wells Notice. Typically, such exchanges would instead choose to file a lawsuit following receipt of the notice.
Initially, ConsenSys took legal action against the regulatory body in a federal court in Texas. Yet, their case was thrown out, ruling in favor of the Commission.
From my perspective as a crypto investor, I’ve been noticing that Cryptocom seems to be repeating similar strategies with the hope of achieving different outcomes.
Sadly, Stark doesn’t foresee a different outcome for ConsenSys’ lawsuit against the SEC. He predicts that the case will likely be thrown out due to it not being “ready” or “mature” enough for a court decision (i.e., lack of “ripeness”).
In the following period, it is expected that the agency will take strong legal action against the exchange. If this occurs, Cryptocom could find itself embroiled in a prolonged legal battle, needing multiple attorneys to navigate through it. Stark is skeptical that these lawyers will manage to secure a win for Cryptocom amidst what he calls a “legal charade.
His final prediction is that these lawyers representing the exchange would buy beach houses from the fees accrued during the trial. The ex-SEC official’s prediction suggest to Cryptocom and other crypto exchanges that suing the SEC is never a great idea.
At the same time, a stronger argument could help Crypto.com overthrow the SEC.
Crypto Firms Pay Millions of Dollars in SEC Settlements
For quite some time now, various cryptocurrency companies have found themselves under scrutiny by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), leading them to negotiate settlements with this regulatory body. More recently, Judge Analisa Torres decided that Ripple, a blockchain-based payment company, must pay a penalty of $125 million in its ongoing legal battle with the SEC.
Just like the Mango Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) was requested to pay $700,000 as part of the settlement between Mango Market and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for unregistered sales of their MNGO tokens, the Mango DAO has now declined this proposal. This decision, along with Cryptocom’s stance against the SEC, underscores the evolving relationship between crypto businesses and regulators.
Read More
- LUNC PREDICTION. LUNC cryptocurrency
- BTC PREDICTION. BTC cryptocurrency
- USD PHP PREDICTION
- USD ZAR PREDICTION
- BICO PREDICTION. BICO cryptocurrency
- SOL PREDICTION. SOL cryptocurrency
- VANRY PREDICTION. VANRY cryptocurrency
- USD COP PREDICTION
- USD CLP PREDICTION
- NAKA PREDICTION. NAKA cryptocurrency
2024-10-09 23:11