Facebook Hit With Lawsuit: Judge Says They Can’t Hide Behind Crypto Scams

As a crypto investor with experience in the industry, I’m deeply concerned about the recent developments surrounding the lawsuit against Meta Platforms (Facebook) over cryptocurrency scams using deepfakes of Australian mining magnate Andrew Forrest. This case hits home for me as I have lost money to similar scams in the past.


As a crypto investor and Australian businessman, I’m thrilled to share some exciting news with you. This week, I secured a legal victory against Meta Platforms in the US. The company tried to dismiss my lawsuit, but a judge rejected their attempt. The reason behind this legal battle is that Meta allegedly facilitated a huge crypto scam campaign using my likeness and deepfakes. Unsuspecting victims were tricked into sending millions of dollars to these fraudsters, misled by the false association with me. I’m determined to hold Meta accountable for their role in this deception.

Facebook: On Fake Endorsements And Real Losses

A legal case focuses on misleading Facebook ads featuring Forrest, which falsely presented him as backing cryptocurrency scams and questionable financial ventures. Based on the court records, approximately 1,000 of these ads were shown in Australia from April to November 2023.

The advertisements were crafted to seem authentic, utilizing techniques such as fabricated endorsements and manipulated clips including Forrest. Forrest alleges that certain deepfakes were generated through Meta’s promotional tools, capitalizing on artificial intelligence to improve visual content.

Facebook Hit With Lawsuit: Judge Says They Can’t Hide Behind Crypto Scams

This campaign had widespread consequences. The complaint maintains that misleading advertisements caused victims to sustain substantial financial damages amounting to millions of dollars. According to Forrest, Meta’s lenient advertising policies and focus on generating ad revenue facilitated the fraudulent scheme’s prosperity.

A Landmark Case For Social Media Accountability

As an analyst, I would rephrase it as follows: I believe this legal dispute could set a significant precedent in the ongoing effort to hold social media companies like Meta accountable for the user-generated content on their platforms. Historically, these entities have benefited from robust immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which safeguards them against liability for third-party posts.

Dr. Andrew Forrest took legal action against Meta Platforms due to misleading Facebook advertisements featuring deepfake images of him endorsing cryptocurrency.

He alleged that Meta’s software helped to create some of the scam ads via GenAI tools.

Today, the court ruled that his publicity rights and negligence claims can go forward.

— Rob Freund (@RobertFreundLaw) June 18, 2024

As a crypto investor, I’ve come across cases like Forrest’s where the outcome rests on the allegation that Meta played an active role in crafting and spreading misleading advertisements through their advertising platform and insufficient review mechanisms.

Casey Pitts, the judge, refused Meta’s attempt to dismiss the case, recognizing its potential impact. In his decision, he noted that Forrest alleges Meta earned greater revenues from ads featuring his likeness compared to what they would have made without his image. This assertion, according to the judge, is sufficient to suggest that Meta benefited from the misappropriation.

Facebook Hit With Lawsuit: Judge Says They Can’t Hide Behind Crypto Scams

Total crypto market cap currently at $2.3 trillion. Chart: TradingView

The Challenge Of AI-Generated Deception

Deepfakes and artificial intelligence-generated content introduce a new level of intricacy to the problem at hand. With advanced capabilities to produce lifelike and deceptive fabrications, these technologies pose a significant challenge in distinguishing authentic content from sophisticated hoaxes.

As a researcher studying this developing legal situation, I can’t definitively predict the result of this ongoing lawsuit. Yet, its implications are already igniting debates among scholars and the public. Specifically, it raises important questions about the accountability of social media behemoths such as Facebook and the potential hazards of unchecked artificial intelligence (AI) technology.

Read More

2024-06-20 12:42