Peter Brandt, Willy Woo Issue Dire Warning On Tether (USDT)

by

As an experienced financial analyst, I have closely monitored the cryptocurrency market for several years, and I share Peter Brandt’s concerns about Tether (USDT). The allegations raised by Consumers’ Research regarding Tether’s transparency, financial stability, and potential involvement in illicit transactions are not new, but they add to the growing skepticism surrounding this major stablecoin.

Renowned investor and cryptocurrency analyst Peter Brandt voiced serious worries about the future of Tether (USDT), a significant stablecoin in the digital currency sector. This debate was initiated by a post from Consumers’ Research, a non-profit entity, which brought up various accusations against Tether.

Peter Brandt On Tether

Critics, including Consumers’ Research, have accused Tether of deceiving the market regarding its U.S. dollar backing and assigned it a risky rating by S&P. Furthermore, this organization pointed out that Tether has declined to undergo a thorough external financial examination. Brandt, who is known for his skepticism towards Tether, shared Consumers’ Research post and expressed his perspective.

As a long-term crypto investor, I’ve held the belief that Tether’s days are numbered. Brandt’s view aligns with my own – the US Dollar’s downfall may not come before Tether’s.

Brandt’s statement underscores long-standing doubts regarding Tether’s openness and financial security. Tether has been subjected to criticism and legal disputes due to its declaration that every USDT is backed by one U.S. dollar in reserve. Skeptics contend that the company has not presented adequate proof to support this claim, leading to market uncertainty.

As a financial analyst, I’d like to contribute some perspectives to the ongoing discussion. Contrary to Brandt’s pessimistic outlook, Bitcoin maximalist Willy Woo presented an alternative viewpoint. Woo emphasized that Tether has managed to survive against all odds for the past decade, defying numerous predictions of its demise. He further pointed out that both Tether and Bitcoin have reached substantial scale around their respective 10-year milestones.

I analyzed Tether’s resilience and ability to adapt in the face of market volatility, suggesting that its longevity sets it apart from other assets. Moreover, I put forth the perspective that Tether is transitioning towards over-collateralized assets, which could potentially outperform traditional low-yield securities like Treasury Bills. Furthermore, I pointed out the possibility of Tether diversifying into assets such as Bitcoin and gold, a move that could enhance its stability and value retention.

Illicit Transaction Allegations

Recently, Will Hild, the Executive Director at Consumers’ Research, brought up that Russia and other countries have been using stablecoins to bypass sanctions. This comes after accusations against Tether in the wake of Hamas’ attacks on Israel in October, which resulted in approximately 100 Binance accounts being frozen by the Israeli government, while Tether itself froze assets worth around $800,000.

In a recent post on X, Hild expressed that Tether has found widespread use – from Russia to evade monetary penalties, to countries like Venezuela, and even amongst human traffickers. Notably, last year, approximately 20 billion dollars worth of illicit transactions were linked to Tether. Furthermore, this digital currency has been implicated in transactions associated with known terrorist groups such as Hamas, Al Qaeda, ISIS, and others, amounting to millions of dollars.

Hild also alleged that Tether may be engaged in illicit activities, likening it to the collapse of FTX. Moreover, there’s growing concern over crypto assets being linked to unlawful financial transactions. Consequently, regulatory bodies are taking steps to prevent such activities.

Read More

2024-06-20 15:44