Remedy’s FBC: Firebreak Aims To Escape FOMO Infection

by

As a gaming enthusiast, I’m eagerly anticipating Remedy Entertainment’s next big project, FBC: Firebreak – a multiplayer shooter in the intriguing universe of Control. If Mike Kayatta, the game’s director, is to be trusted, this isn’t your typical AAA title. It seems like they’re breaking new ground with its design.

Recently, in an interview with IGN, Kayatta shared some of his thoughts about the current state of the video game industry, particularly within the AAA sector. He expressed concerns over aspects such as the grand scale of projects, the vast marketing expenditures, and more, all contributing to a problem he aims to address through his work at Remedy.

fbc-firebreak-trailer-promo-screenshot-1.jpg

Kayatta mentioned that someone had compared game developers to artists constructing grand cathedrals in a very articulate manner. In essence, he was implying that these developers are engaged in a competition to create increasingly intricate, stunning, and costly structures.

In a realm filled with dazzling attractions, where long-lasting live service games and lifestyle platforms reign for years, it’s natural that certain ones will outperform the rest. While these extraordinary experiences are truly valuable and I am grateful they exist, not everyone can create or sustain them in this competitive niche.

The amount of money involved is staggering.

Kayatta highlights a stark difference in the realm of independent video games. Unlike the larger-scale AAA projects, even smaller endeavors can achieve success. He expresses admiration for these ventures that can launch with minimal marketing efforts, sometimes leading to tremendous success. He points out examples such as Stardew Valley and the recently released Blue Prince.

Kayatta explains that Firebreak is finding its unique place, not exactly like God of War: Ragnarok or Grand Theft Auto 6, but offering more than just Slay the Spire. In simpler terms, he suggests that Firebreak is carving out its own identity, standing somewhere between established big titles and smaller indie games.

Let’s focus on creating a game that is developed responsibly, with a suitable team size, budget, and development time. Our aim is to create a product that values player time and doesn’t try to exploit it or overprice it. I believe there’s room for this approach in the market, and we’re striving to address it with our game.

Kayatta explains that while many contemporary games effectively use the “Fear Of Missing Out” (FOMO) to create excitement, he aims for FBC: Firebreak to avoid such trends typical in the gaming industry. He believes that FOMO has become quite prevalent in modern games and wants to minimize its influence on their design.

FBC: Firebreak Rejects The Principles Of Modern Gaming

In simpler terms, Kayatta’s objectives go beyond merely managing FOMO (Fear of Missing Out). It also influences the game’s pricing structure. Unlike free-to-play games, Kayatta intends for this game to cost around $40, and once paid, there are no additional costs involved.

“We don’t do daily check-ins, timed battle passes, all that other stuff that dictates your time.”

This decision is daring, yet it’s not unprecedented. Over time, there’s been an increasing demand for a product that doesn’t require the tedious live service grind. In fact, even large-scale promotional efforts have been abandoned in some cases, like Bethesda’s remaster of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, which was marketed differently.

It seems as though we’re stepping into an innovative era for the gaming industry, where highlighting the absence of typical AAA game excesses can be a strong marketing advantage. This sentiment aligns well with the recent triumphs experienced within the Indie sector.

If larger game releases indeed shift towards the “AA” structure and manage to shed the obligations associated with AAA games, it’s possible that we could witness a rise in similar titles becoming available for purchase.

Read More

2025-05-14 21:19