Ripple Vs. SEC: Lawyer Predicts Impact Of Biden’s Crypto Softening

As a researcher with experience in the legal and cryptocurrency fields, I find James “MetaLawMan” Murphy’s insights on the potential impact of political changes on the ongoing Ripple Labs vs. SEC case intriguing. The shift in regulatory approaches under the Biden administration, as well as the possibility of a change in leadership at the SEC, could significantly influence the outcome of this legal battle.


As the founder and chairman of Murphy & McGonigle, I, James “MetaLawMan” Murphy, have offered my professional perspective on how the recent policy shifts under President Joe Biden’s administration could potentially influence ongoing legal disputes, such as the one between Ripple Labs and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). During a recent conversation on X, I discussed these insights.

As an analyst, I’ve been observing the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the guidance of Chair Gary Gensler, who has taken a firm stance on cryptocurrency regulation, focusing on investor protection through rigorous enforcement. However, it’s important to note that political circumstances could influence regulatory approaches. With upcoming elections on the horizon, potential changes in SEC leadership might bring about shifts in the commission’s cryptocurrency regulatory stance.

Can Ripple Leverage Biden’s Crypto Softening?

As a crypto investor, I share Murphy’s hesitance regarding reaching a resolution with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in its present state. I wouldn’t advise settling any cryptocurrency case with the current SEC until after the election results are clear. The potential change in leadership could significantly impact the regulatory landscape. For instance, based on Trump and Kennedy’s statements, we might anticipate a more open-minded SEC under Hester Peirce or similar figures.

Peirce, nicknamed “Crypto Mom,” is well-liked in the cryptocurrency sphere for her controversial perspectives advocating a more lenient regulatory attitude. She hypothesized that under new leadership at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), there could be substantial shifts, such as dismissing voluntarily cases initiated by the Gary Gensler administration where no fraudulent activities or victimization occurred.

As a researcher studying the regulatory landscape of cryptocurrencies, I’ve noticed a shift in tone from the Biden administration regarding digital assets. This change comes following former President Trump’s vocal support for Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. For instance, Murphy’s recent statement signaled a more lenient stance towards these emerging technologies. It’s important to note that this development occurred not long after Trump reaffirmed his pro-Bitcoin and crypto stance in clear terms: “I will champion the future of crypto and Bitcoin, ensuring their growth originates from within the United States. I will uphold the right to self-custody for our nation’s 50 million crypto holders, keeping Elizabeth Warren and her regulatory team at bay from your Bitcoin.”

In reaction to his rival’s political moves, Biden demonstrated this through the green light given to a Bitcoin-linked Ethereum Exchange Traded Fund (ETF). This action is noteworthy as it signifies progress, considering past hesitance to approve crypto ETFs due to apprehensions over market instability and safeguarding investors.

As a crypto investor, I would explain it this way: The more lenient approach towards cryptocurrencies by the current administration doesn’t impact Judge Torres’ decision in the Ripple case. The judicial process and administrative shifts are separate entities. The independence of the judiciary ensures that one does not influence the other.

He admitted that this situation could influence the SEC’s approach during possible settlement talks, implying, “Perhaps it may modify the SEC’s bargaining stance—should there be any settlement negotiations.”

In the conversation about X, the topic shifted to potential strategies for Ripple. One participant advocated for a cautious move towards settling legal matters, explaining, “Given the unpredictability of future political landscapes, it seems wise for Ripple to settle any opportunities that come their way. After all, it’s better to deal with a known devil than an unknown one.” Another participant acknowledged this perspective but remained impartial, stating, “I see your point. However, I don’t hold a view on what action Ripple should take.”

At press time, XRP traded at $0.52737.

Ripple Vs. SEC: Lawyer Predicts Impact Of Biden’s Crypto Softening

Read More

2024-05-27 09:41