As a long-time crypto investor, I’ve grown accustomed to the rollercoaster ride that comes with navigating the ever-evolving regulatory landscape. Yesterday’s Kraken hearing update from Metalawman brought both anticipation and apprehension. The outcome of this case could significantly impact the future of cryptocurrency exchanges and their relationship with securities regulators.
As a crypto investor keeping a close eye on regulatory developments, I’ve been following the latest updates from Metalawman, a well-respected legal expert in the X community. Recently, he shared some insights about the SEC vs. Kraken hearing that unfolded in a federal court in San Francisco.
Yesterday, a hearing took place regarding Kraken’s request to dismiss the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) enforcement action. Kraken’s petition to dismiss is centered around the Howey test and argues that the SEC did not adequately allege any securities transactions occurred on the Kraken platform.
Senator Lummis, the Blockchain Association, DeFi Education Fund, Chamber of Digital Commerce, Investor Choice Advocates Network, Paradigm, and two administrative law scholars submitted supportive briefs in favor of Kraken’s motion.
The recent hearing on Kraken’s attempt to throw out the case in a San Francisco federal court has concluded. Prior to any debates, the Judge expressed his predisposition towards upholding the decisions of Judges Rakoff and Failla – denying Kraken’s motion to dismiss.
— MetaLawMan (@MetaLawMan) June 20, 2024
At the recent court session focusing on Kraken’s attempt to throw out the case, Judge William Orrick made an important statement before the arguments began. He expressed his intention to align with the decisions of Judges Rakoff and Failla, suggesting a probable rejection of Kraken’s motion to dismiss.
Metalawman noted that Judge Orrick appeared unfazed by the points raised during the hearing in the Kraken case. This suggests that the legal battle could potentially drag on for several years and incur significant expenses, much like the protracted Ripple case.
As a researcher delving into the background of this case, I came across an intriguing fact: Judge Orrick has a family connection to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Specifically, his uncle once held a position as a commissioner for the SEC during the 1950s. This familial tie adds a layer of historical context that could potentially influence our understanding of Judge Orrick’s current role in this case.
The refusal to dismiss the motion could indicate a lengthy legal confrontation between Kraken and the SEC, requiring substantial investments and rigorous examination. As this case progresses, it is expected to garner considerable attention from the cryptocurrency sector and juristic community due to its potential ramifications on the regulatory framework for digital currencies.
Read More
- SOL PREDICTION. SOL cryptocurrency
- USD ZAR PREDICTION
- AVAX PREDICTION. AVAX cryptocurrency
- MNT PREDICTION. MNT cryptocurrency
- USD MYR PREDICTION
- Top gainers and losers
- RARE PREDICTION. RARE cryptocurrency
- ARKM PREDICTION. ARKM cryptocurrency
- TAO PREDICTION. TAO cryptocurrency
- Call of Duty: MW3 and Warzone Season 5 Reloaded Update Patch Notes Revealed
2024-06-21 17:01