US SEC Extends Deadline In Elon Musk Settlement Offer

by

As an analyst with over two decades of experience in the tech and finance sectors, I’ve seen my fair share of high-profile legal battles involving industry titans. In this case, the US SEC’s decision to extend its deadline for Elon Musk’s response to the Twitter inquiry settlement offer is reminiscent of a chess game between two formidable opponents.

In simpler terms, Elon Musk, a well-known business tycoon and entrepreneur, has been given more time by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to respond to their offer regarding the Twitter probe settlement. The SEC moved the deadline to December 16, anticipating that Musk would submit his response during this extended period.

US SEC Compromises on its Deadline to Elon Musk

To provide context, the securities watchdog extended a settlement proposal to Elon Musk on Tuesday. The SEC asked for a response within 48 hours, meaning it was due by December 12th. Instead of his formal response, Musk chose to share a copy of a letter from his lawyer to Gary Gensler, the SEC Chairman. In this letter, Musk’s attorney stated that the SEC staff had given him 48 hours to either agree to pay a fine or risk facing charges.

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has pushed back the deadline for Elon Musk to respond to their settlement offer in the Twitter probe until Monday, according to sources.

If Elon Musk fails to respond within the specified timeframe, we might move forward to a ‘Wells Submission’ and explore the possibility of a fresh settlement negotiation, according to the source.

— *Walter Bloomberg (@DeItaone) December 13, 2024

Moving the deadline to Monday is a concession granted due to a request for additional time. However, it’s not yet clear if Elon Musk’s lawyer, Alex Spiro, will convince the court to meet his client’s demands. Spiro recently characterized the SEC’s actions as an “unending campaign” focused on investigating Tesla’s CEO.

Based on the authorization provided, his non-compliance could lead to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission submitting a “Wells Notice” to Elon Musk.

It appears that the tech tycoon has been entangled in a prolonged legal dispute with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In this current situation, the agency is looking into Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter for $44 billion, which he later renamed X. Specifically, the SEC wants to determine if Musk violated securities laws when he purchased X stock two years ago.

As a researcher, I’m delving into the statements and documents that Elon Musk submitted regarding the deal. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is seeking a court order to compel him to appear and testify about this matter, as they have issued a subpoena for that purpose.

The probe on Neuralink

As an analyst, I’m keeping a close eye on recent developments concerning Neuralink, Elon Musk’s brain-computer interface (BCI) company. The scrutiny of this neurotechnology firm initially emerged in 2023, when lawmakers expressed doubts about the safety of their brain implant technology. Despite Musk’s assertions that it is safe, there remain some lingering concerns.

To date, the securities regulator has not specified the specific details of these charges, instead referring to it as a prolonged investigation spanning multiple years. Under these circumstances, Elon Musk penned down: “Gary, I can’t believe you would involve me in this way.

During that time, the court chose not to impose penalties on Musk related to the $44 billion X acquisition agreement from last month, as requested by the Commission.

Read More

2024-12-13 21:08