When Promises Meet Reality: Cardano’s “Completion” Sparks Fiery Quarrels 🍿

by

Upon a most curious declaration on Wednesday last, Mr. Charles Hoskinson, the esteemed founder of Cardano (ADA) and head of Input Output Global (IOG), proclaimed that the Cardano project hath been brought to its completion. Pray, mark well—he avers he hath toiled without so much as a shilling since the year of our Lord 2020, driven solely by affection for the cause.

By “completed,” good sir meant that the network hath fulfilled every original covenant set forth at Cardano’s commencement in 2015 (how quaint!).

The “Completed” Cardano Affair: A Slapstick Debate Among Gentlefolk

The genesis of this unfolding drama lies in the termination of IOG’s initial contract, commenced with the revered Genesis Block Distribution of 2015.

“Cardano is done and dusted. The original agreement expired in 2020. Since then, I have been laboring gratis out of pure devotion to Cardano,” declared Mr. Hoskinson with grand fervor.

Moreover, he contended that the scaling promised by the original roadmap is achieved, though it hath since become a “moving target,” much like the affections of a coquette. The present endeavors include ventures of high ambition, named Leios and Hydra.

Yet, these noble projects dangle precariously upon the thorn of uncertain funding. Should pennies fail to fall, these enterprises may flee to greener pastures elsewhere—an announcement that quickened the pulse of many a venerable community member.

“With all due respect, might one ask: how hath the contract been fulfilled if scaling remains, shall we say, a ‘work in progress’?” voiced a perturbed onlooker.

The roadmap, which Mr. Hoskinson avouches ended in 2020, held aloft the promise of scalability rivaling the giants of blockchain lore. Hydra, that mythical beast, aims to grant Cardano the power to process transactions in parallel, a feat to rival even the most sprightly Solana’s boast of 65,000 transactions per second—a staggering specter given Cardano’s present modest speed.

Nevertheless, many a devotee insist that Cardano is yet far from fulfilling its grand design of third-generation blockchain grandeur, suitable for widespread adoption.

“Basho, Leios, and Hydra were oft spoken of but remain conspicuously absent from the mainnet stage. Pray, then, how is Cardano ‘fully completed’ as per the original blueprint? The proof lies in the pudding, and this pudding hath a few lumps,” quipped another skeptic.

Meanwhile, this kerfuffle echoes far beyond technicalities, touching upon the governance and funding of Cardano itself. Mr. Hoskinson made clear his unwillingness to persist at loss or toil without recompense.

He challenged the notion prevailing among the community—that of embracing decentralized decision-making via “competitive bids” for development. Such a scheme, he warned, might prove naught but a devilish favor to Western developers burdened with exorbitant costs.

His apprehension laid bare: adopting such practices might compel IOG to dismiss innumerable staff or transplant their efforts to more frugal locales such as India or Eastern Europe.

“…I shall not, with a heavy heart, sever hundreds from their positions to replace them with cheaper labor, as the usual mercantile custom commands. We are not a mere ‘time and material’ concern; we labor in the noble craft of cryptocurrencies,” he declared with no small measure of candor.

Not for the first occasion hath Mr. Hoskinson expressed disapproval, having previously taken umbrage at the Cardano Foundation’s governance, accusing it of marginalizing the loyal ADA community and promoting instead a membership-based organization (MBO) scheme.

Previous skirmishes have involved spirited arguments over budget distributions and the recent Cardano constitution, whose reception remains cautious and measured.

At this moment, the ADA token flutters at a modest $0.68, declining nearly two percent within the last day—a figure not altogether surprising amidst such theatrical exchanges.

Read More

2025-04-24 09:06