Why Assassins Creed Shadows May Be Better Off Playing It Safe With DLC

by

Why Assassins Creed Shadows May Be Better Off Playing It Safe With DLC

Highlights

  • Assassin’s Creed Shadows introduces dual protagonists with unique specialties for specific missions and combat.
  • Yasuke, an African samurai in the game, has faced historical validity challenges, but the franchise prioritizes inspiration over realism.
  • A DLC focused on realism could help ease the backlash and offer a unique take on the franchise.

As a seasoned gamer who’s witnessed the evolution of the Assassin’s Creed franchise from its humble beginnings, I must say that the upcoming release of Shadows has stirred quite a storm. The dual protagonists with their unique skill sets are intriguing, and Yasuke, the African samurai, despite facing historical validity challenges, is a breath of fresh air in this otherwise familiar world.

Before Assassin’s Creed Shadows hits the shelves, it’s already stirring up debates. Although there have been numerous games in the Assassin’s Creed series, what sets Assassin’s Creed Shadows apart is its introduction of dual protagonists – Yasuke and Naoe – each with distinct abilities tailored for specific tasks. Yasuke, a towering samurai, functions as the Tank, while agile Naoe specializes in stealth tactics.

Despite the captivating design and backstories of both characters, there’s been a storm of debate about whether Yasuke, portrayed as an African samurai, is historically accurate. Given that Yasuke is based on a genuine historical figure, some vocal critics have questioned his authenticity in this context. However, since the Assassin’s Creed series draws inspiration from history rather than striving for realism, Yasuke remains an enticing character, regardless of his historical accuracy. The franchise has often pushed the boundaries of imagination, particularly with its DLC, but the inclusion of Yasuke isn’t as far-fetched as some other concepts. Despite ongoing online petitions to cancel Shadows, a well-crafted DLC emphasizing realism might help assuage some of the criticism.

Assassin’s Creed Shadows Grounding the Franchise’s Wild DLC History

A Franchise Steeped in Historical Fiction

Several instances within the Assassin’s Creed series have left gamers puzzled. Notably, some of the most extraordinary additions to the game’s lore include the downloadable content (DLC) for Assassin’s Creed 3 titled “The Tyranny of King Washington” and “Dawn of Ragnarok” from Assassin’s Creed Valhalla. These expansions have generated a range of opinions, and part of this is due to their rather extraordinary nature.

The main plot of The Tyranny of King Washington revolves around a vision that protagonist Ratonhnhaké:ton has of George Washington taking control of the United States of America and becoming a tyrant. Although a fun DLC, thanks to its unique story, it’s not ideal for those who crave more historical accuracy. The other DLC of note is Dawn of Ragnarok, Valhalla‘s DLC centered around the popular Norse myth. Dawn of Ragnarok‘s feedback was more of a mixed bag than The Tyranny of KingWashington, but it’s still a unique take on mythology. However, DLCs like this aren’t everyone’s cup of tea, and Shadows offering a more realistic DLC could be a good change of pace.

Assassin’s Creed Shadows Squashing Criticism With a More Realistic DLC

As a gaming enthusiast, I’ve got to highlight two exceptional expansions that veer away from historical accuracy: “The Tyranny of King Washington” and “Dawn of Ragnarok.” Although the Assassin’s Creed series is known for its blend of history and fiction, some gamers appreciate a more grounded gaming experience. If “Shadows,” like many other games in the franchise, were to venture into another whimsical DLC concept, it might stir up dissatisfaction among those fans who yearn for a more traditional narrative.

Pre-order sales for
Assassin’s Creed Shadows
are strong, despite the game’s divisive nature.

A realistic focus for an upcoming expansion could help address the criticism that arose after the announcement of “AC Shadows.” One reason why the Assassin’s Creed series has remained popular over the years is its blend of historical accuracy and imaginative storytelling. While it’s not essential to create DLC with outlandish ideas like a tyranny-focused George Washington for “Shadows,” going too far with expansion stories might not always be well-received. Given the feedback on “Shadows,” Ubisoft might find it more prudent to avoid creating potential DLC that could stir controversy.

Regardless of any debates, AC Shadows strives to offer a fresh perspective within the established series. While alterations might spark disagreement, Ubisoft’s innovation is intriguing as it may herald a fresh start for the Assassin’s Creed games. The historical figure Yasuke remains enigmatic, but if the character is appealing, that should be enough. A grounded DLC could help assuage some of the criticism.

Read More

2024-08-06 15:04